1 / 20

WRITING A PUBLISHABLE EMPIRICAL PAPER

WRITING A PUBLISHABLE EMPIRICAL PAPER. Biodun Ogunyemi Dept . of Curriculum Studies & Instructional Technology , Olabisi Onabanjo University , Ago-Iwoye Email: ogunyemi_biodun@yahoo.co.uk

peta
Download Presentation

WRITING A PUBLISHABLE EMPIRICAL PAPER

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. WRITING A PUBLISHABLE EMPIRICAL PAPER BiodunOgunyemi Dept. of CurriculumStudies & InstructionalTechnology, OlabisiOnabanjoUniversity, Ago-Iwoye Email: ogunyemi_biodun@yahoo.co.uk Being a presentation at the«WorkshoponWritingforPublication» organisedby Social StudiesAssociation of Nigeria (SOSAN) held at theObafemiAwolowoUniversity, Ile-Ife, onTuesday, 27th November, 2012

  2. INTRODUCTION • Challenge for academics: “Publish or Perish” – to underscore our role as academics i.e. “to assist in advancing the disciple through research and writing” (Parasuraman, 2003: 314). • Ill-equipped academics - rat-race, game of number, poorly conceptualized and badly written journal articles. • Reports: About 80% of articles submitted to reputable academic journals are not publishable (Summers, 2001), “with up to 9 of every 10 manuscripts being rejected by leading journals” (McKercher, Law, Weber, Song & Hsu, 2007). • Consequences: Frustration, decline productivity, “a lower perception towards research and publishing by younger lecturers compared to the older academics” (Migosi, Muola & Maithya, 2012: 115). • Why are papers rejected?

  3. WHY DO EDITORS REJECT EMPIRICAL PAPERS? • Theresearchquestions - notveryinteresting, no theoreticalimplications. • Contributiontoliterature – lowor non-existent, merereplication of familiar reports. • Conceptual framework – poorconceptualisation of constructs, no compellingrationaleforhypotheses/questions. • Methodology – highlyflaweddesign, validity of measuressuspect. • Write-up – confusing, unclear, unsystematizedmaking a goodrevisionalmostimpossible. (Summers, 2001)

  4. POSERS FOR THIS PRESENTATION • What is an empirical paper? • What preparations go into a publishable empirical paper? • How does one see the paper through into an academic journal?

  5. DEFINING EMPIRICAL PAPER • Empiricalpapersassignnumericalvaluestothe variables understudy. • Three (3) researchdesignsgenerally define quantitativepapers: • Descriptivequantitativestudies - observations, tests, surveys. • Mixedmethod – qualitative plus quantitative, data analysed in verbal-transcribedform (qualitative) combinedwithsurvey data, tests, etc. e.g. actionresearch, phenomenologicalresearch, case studyresearch, ethnography, comparativehistoricalinquiry. • Experimental research – involvingthemanipulation of independent variables toanswerthequestion of causationi.e. measuringtheeffect of theindependent (orinfluencing) variables onthedependent (theactedupon) variables.

  6. PREPARING FOR EMPIRICAL PAPER • 12 Guidelinesforaspiringto do scholarlyresearch (Summers, 2001): • Develop a broad set of methodologicalskills • Learnto be a criticalreader of theLiterature • Focusondevelopinghypothesesto be tested • Use theliteraturetostimulateyourthinking • Putitonpaper • Don’twork in isolation • Develop precise conceptual definitionsfortheconstructs • Evaluatethehypotheses • Identifytheintendedcontributions • Designtheempiricalstudy • Pretestquestionnaires • Pretestexperiments

  7. WRITING THE MANUSCRIPT Table 1: TypicalStructure of anAcademicArticle • Title8 -15 words • Abstract200 -250 words • Keywords6 – 8 words • Literaturereview (Alternatively: Background, • conceptual developmentor conceptual framework) 1,000-2000 words • Methods(Alternatively, Methodology) 500–1000 words Sampling - Target population and researchcontext - Sampling - Respondentprofile • Data collection • - Data collectionmethods • Measures (Alternatively: Measurement

  8. WRITING THE MANUSCRIPT-contd • Results (Alternatively: Findings) 1000-1500 words Descriptivestatistics (Alternatively: Preliminaryanalysis) Hypothesistesting (Alternatively: Inferentialstatistics) • Discussion 1000-1500 words • Summary of findings • Managerialimplications • Limitations • Recommendationsforfutureresearch • Total 4000 – 7000 words

  9. TITLE • Attractthereader’sattention • Short, specificbasedrestrictedlengthby target journal (usually 10-15 words) • Researchdesign+ population + geographicalarea (e.g. Valuesprofiles and susceptibilityto interpersonal influence: A survey of studentsmokers at theUniversity of Pretoria) (Grober, 2003) • Bringsouttherelationshipbetweentheindependent and dependent variables of thestudy(Effects of twoproblem-solvingmethodsonlearningoutcomes of junior secondaryschool social studiesstudents) • AddressesthequestionsWhat, How, WithWhomand where of thestudy • N.B: Itisbettertowritetitle, keywords and abstractonthecompletion of thearticle.

  10. ABSTRACT Seven (7) elementsrecommended (Perry et al., 2003) • A briefthemesentenceontheoverallissueaddressed • Mainaimorpurpose of thestudy • Academic and/orpracticalimportance • Themethodologyused • Themainfindings of thestudy • Thecontributionmade • Implications of findingsforfutureresearch

  11. KEYWORDS • Central concepts and termsthatarousetheinterest of thereader • Provide links toyourarticle in theelectronicdatabase • Should «reflectthe discipline, sub-discipline, theme, researchdesign and context» (Kotze, 2007) • Usuallybetween 5 and 8 words • Present in sentence case and in italics

  12. INTRODUCTION • Likeanexecutivesummarywithfour (4) goals: • Toestablishtheimportance of the general area of interest. • Toindicate in general termswhat has been done in this groad area. • Toidentifyimpartant gaps, inconsistencies, and/orcontroversies in therelevantliterature. • Toprovide a concisestatement of themanuscript’spurpose(s), thecontributionsthemanuscriptmakestotheliterature.

  13. LIT. REV/CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK • Anessential guide-post tomeaningfulresearch. • Done withsix (6) goals in mind (Leedy & Ormrod, 2005): • Tofindtherelationshipsamongthevariousreportsthatyouread (e.g. definition of constructs and variables). • Tofindoutdifferences in existingreports. • Toidentify gaps to be filled. • To examine therelevance of themethodologywhichothershaveused. • Tohighlightthefindings and limitations of previousstudy. • Todraw a link betweenwas done and yours (ANOTHER BLOCK ON THE WALL?)

  14. RESEARCH QUESTIONS/HYPOTHESES • Questionsthatserve as posersbasedonthepurposeof thestudy. • Formulatemajor and minorRQs. • Descriptive and mixed-methods can make do withRQs • Experimental studiesaim at testinghypotheses. • Hypothesis – tentativeexplanationfortherelationshipbetweenthe variables of underinvestigation. • Nullhypotheses – Stating no «effect» or «relationship»; Rejectordo notreject. • Formulatemajor (e.g. maineffect) and minor (effect of moderator variables) in empiricalresearch.

  15. METHODOLOGY • Describe in detailhowtheresearchwasconducted • Theresearchdesign - theparadigmforconductingthestudy – descriptive, mixedmethod, experimental? • Sampling – describe the target population, researchcontext and unitsof analysis; sample and samplingtechnique; and profiles of therespondents. • Instrumentation – surveyquestionnaire, achievement test, attitudescale, IDI protocol, FGD guide, etc. • Data Collection – Whatprocedure– personal, fieldassistants, etc. • Procedurefor data analysis – Chi-square, t-test, ANOVA, ANCOVA, etc.

  16. RESULTS • General guidelines (Kotze, 2007): • Be concise, yetprovideenoughdetailtojustifyconclusions. • Explainadvancedmultivariatestatisticalmethods (e.g. repeatedmeasures ANOVA, twoorone-way ANOVA, multipleregressionanalysis and factor analysis) in non-technicalterms. • Use figures and tablestosummariseinformation. Golden rule:Ifyou can sayit in a sentenceorparagraph, do so. Reserve figures forthereallyimportantstuffthat has to be portrayedvisually. • Interprete allresearchfindingsforthereader. • Use acceptablestatisticalabbreviationse.g. ANOVA, df, f, Ho, etc

  17. DISCUSSION/conclusion • This can have a largeimpactontheimpressionsthereaderhave of yourmanuscript. • Should be done with a viewto(Summers, 2001): • BuildingontheIntroductionsection. • Reaffirmingtheimportance of thestudybyshowinghowthestudyreportedfitsintotheliterature. • Communicatingthestudyimplicationsfortheory and practice. • Supportingconclusionswith data-evidence. • Identifying new issuesraisedbythestudyfindings and orprovidinginsightful (nonobvious) directionsforfutureresearch.

  18. REFERENCING/DOCUMENTATION • Generate a list of allmaterials – published, unpublished, electronic, archival, etc. – consulted in thecourse of theresearch. • Don’tincludematerialsnotusedwithinthebodyunder Reference List. • Followstipulatedguidelinesoncitingreports/writings and otherforms of documentationbythe target journal e. g. APA, Chicago Manual of Style. • Trackallmaterialsfrombodytothelisttoavoidanyomission

  19. FROM CONCEPTION TO PUBLISHING • Hintsforsuccess: • Research can be learned, it can also be unlearned – to be a goodwriter, keepwriting! • Master therequirementsforyour target journalto reduce tension and frustration. • Thegoodwriteris a goodreader; so continuetoreadwhatothershave done. • Toimproveskill, do notwork in isolation – embrace dyadic, triadicinteractionsfor critique. • Do personal criticism of yourresearchreports. • Learnto be mentored

  20. PUBLISH AND FLOURISHThankyouforyourattention!!!

More Related