1 / 4

Checking the Sub-structure of Your Literature Review

Checking the Sub-structure of Your Literature Review. Please post your assignment to the course blog by Saturday, November 14. The Sub-structure of Academic Writing. Repetition Emphasis Approach from a different angle Clarification Linking Forecasting Overview. Signaling

pepin
Download Presentation

Checking the Sub-structure of Your Literature Review

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Checking the Sub-structure of Your Literature Review Please post your assignment to the course blog by Saturday, November 14

  2. The Sub-structure of Academic Writing • Repetition • Emphasis • Approach from a different angle • Clarification • Linking • Forecasting • Overview • Signaling • Revealing the plan • Showing links • Directing attention • Give notice of a connection about to be made • Signposting • Tells the reader where they are • Headings, sub-headings • Topic sentences • Summary paragraphs

  3. The Sub-structure of Your Lit Review • Make a new copy of your lit review • Go through it page by page, marking up (using the comment function in Word) where you have: • Forecasted (overarching ideas or structures) • Signaled (what is coming) • Signposted (where you are) • In the blog post itself, use the checklist on the next slide to analyze which of these have you done well and which need more work.

  4. Checklist for Sub-structure • Forecasting: • Have you referred to all the sections, and/or the overall structure, in all your chapter introduction? • Is it clear, direct and concrete? • Signalling • Are there sufficient explicit signals for the development of your argument as you go along ? • Is each transition noted, and the direction you are moving made explicit? • Signposting • Is it impossible for your readers to lose their way while reading your text? • Is your heading structure unambiguous? (Could the reader understand the structure just by looking at the headings and does it match what you are doing?) • Do you have summary paragraphs either at the end of each section or the beginning of the following section?

More Related