1 / 13

Roger Boisjoly and the Challenger Disaster

Roger Boisjoly and the Challenger Disaster. Ethical lacking at NASA Jeremy Neill March 2, 2000. Outline. Background of Challenger Background of Roger Boisjoly Events from 1977 – 1/28/86 Different ethical choices Events after the disaster. History of Challenger. Second shuttle built

paul2
Download Presentation

Roger Boisjoly and the Challenger Disaster

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Roger Boisjoly and the Challenger Disaster Ethical lacking at NASA Jeremy Neill March 2, 2000

  2. Outline • Background of Challenger • Background of Roger Boisjoly • Events from 1977 – 1/28/86 • Different ethical choices • Events after the disaster

  3. History of Challenger • Second shuttle built • Designed for testing only • Later converted for actual missions • Nine successful launches • First (and last) mission in Teacher In Space Program

  4. Roger Boisjoly • 25+ years of experience before Challenger • Joined Morton Thiokol’s Solid Rocket Booster program in 1985 • Assigned as a Technical Troubleshooter • Member of various engineering and ethics societies

  5. First signs of trouble • 1977: Morton Thiokol first discovers joint rotation problem • Nov 1981: O-ring erosion discovered after second shuttle launch • Jan 1985: Worst case of O-ring erosion yet, on coldest launch yet

  6. Boisjoly’s role • Analyzed O-ring erosion on Jan 1985 flight • Presented findings to superiors and Marshall Space Flight Center • Presented findings to Flight Readiness Review Board for subsequent flight • Originally indicated erosion and blow by caused by low temperatures, but NASA asked for a softened position for Board

  7. Additional concerns • Analysis of April 1985 flight shows primary O-ring never sealed • Additional tests indicate a launch of 50 degrees or lower could result in failure • NASA asks Morton-Thiokol for booster seal problem presentation • Boisjoly presents similar info to SAE to get help. NASA orders it tuned down

  8. Pre-flight Teleconference • Meeting with KSC/MSFC on Jan 27 • Engineering team indicates launches below 53 degrees may have O-ring failure. “Prove it.” • Managers ask for offline discussion. “Take off your engineering hat.” Decide to launch anyway, temp predicted 18, actually hit 8 • NASA asks for further comments. Engineers stay silent

  9. Day of launch • Right O-ring at 28 degrees, ice on shuttle • Puffs of smoke at launch pad • Good luck: Blow-by causes oxidation glaze to fill gaps in O-ring seal • Bad luck: Worst wind sheer hits shuttle. Flex breaks glaze apart • Flames escape SRB and hit External Tank

  10. Ethical Implications • Supervisors clearly ignored problems • NASA downplayed problem 9 years • Could Boisjoly have done more? • Spoken up at end of teleconference? • Separately notified upper NASA management? • Leaked issue to press? • Still has to keep his job.

  11. Events since launch • O-ring design revised • Launch decision now made by astronaut • Boisjoly won Prize for Scientific Freedom and Responsibility from AAAS • Teachers In Space Program canceled

  12. Sources of more information • http://www.onlineethics.org/moral/boisjoly/RB-intro.html • http://www.fas.org/spp/51L.html • http://www.uoguelph.ca/~mgravell/ • http://ethics.tamu.edu/ethics/ethics/shuttle/shuttle1.htm • http://www.bowdoin.edu/dept/physics/astro.1998/astro15/ • http://www.ksc.nasa.gov/shuttle/resources/orbiters/challenger.html • http://catless.ncl.ac.uk/Risks/5.78.html

  13. Summary • NASA knew about O-ring issue • Boisjoly repeatedly urged the issue • Management ignored the advice of professional engineers • Space program set back several years • Some good changes at NASA resulted

More Related