slide1 n.
Download
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
LibQUAL+ ® 2007: An Introduction PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
LibQUAL+ ® 2007: An Introduction

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 60

LibQUAL+ ® 2007: An Introduction - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 71 Views
  • Uploaded on

LibQUAL+ ® 2007: An Introduction. Presented by: Bruce Thompson. LibQUAL+® Canada Ottawa October, 2007. old.libqual.org. LibQUAL+ ® Background and Overview. Reference Transactions. Assessment.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'LibQUAL+ ® 2007: An Introduction' - paul2


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
slide1

LibQUAL+® 2007: An Introduction

Presented by:

Bruce Thompson

LibQUAL+® Canada

Ottawa

October, 2007

old.libqual.org

reference transactions
Reference Transactions

old.libqual.org

assessment
Assessment

“The difficulty lies in trying to find a single model or set of simple indicators that can be used by different institutions, and that will compare something across large groups that is by definition only locally applicable—i.e., how well a library meets the needs of its institution. Librarians have either made do with oversimplified national data or have undertaken customized local evaluations of effectiveness, but there has not been devised an effective way to link the two.”

Sarah Pritchard, Library Trends, 1996

old.libqual.org

multiple methods of listening to customers
Multiple Methodsof Listening to Customers
  • Transactional surveys*
  • Mystery shopping
  • New, declining, and lost-customer surveys
  • Focus group interviews
  • Customer advisory panels
  • Service reviews
  • Customer complaint, comment, and inquiry capture
  • Total market surveys*
  • Employee field reporting
  • Employee surveys
  • Service operating data capture

*A SERVQUAL-type instrument is most suitable for these methods

Note. A. Parasuraman. The SERVQUAL Model: Its Evolution And Current Status. (2000).

Paper presented at ARL Symposium on Measuring Service Quality, Washington, D.C.

old.libqual.org

premises
Premises

Three Seminal Quotations

old.libqual.org

libqual premise 1
LibQUAL+™ Premise #1

“….only customers judge quality;

all other judgments are essentially

irrelevant”

PERCEPTIONS SERVICE

Note. Zeithaml, Parasuraman, Berry. (1999).

Delivering quality service. NY: The Free Press.

old.libqual.org

libqual premise 2
LibQUAL+™ Premise #2

“Il est plus nécessaire d'étudier

les hommes que les livres”

—FRANÇOIS DE LA ROCHEFOUCAULD

old.libqual.org

libqual premise 3
LibQUAL+™ Premise #3

“We only care about the things we measure.”

--Bruce Thompson, CASLIN, 2006

old.libqual.org

dimensions
Dimensions

old.libqual.org

interpreting service quality data
Interpreting Service Quality Data

Three Interpretation Frameworks

old.libqual.org

interpretation framework 1
Interpretation Framework #1

Benchmarking Against Peer Institutions

--1,000,000 Users; 1,000 Institutions!

NORMS! NORMS! NORMS!

old.libqual.org

score norms
Score Norms
  • Norm Conversion Tables facilitate the interpretation of observed scores using norms created for a large and representative sample.
  • LibQUAL+™ norms have been created at both the individual and institutional level

old.libqual.org

institutional norms for perceived means on 25 core questions
Institutional Norms for PerceivedMeans on 25 Core Questions

Note: Thompson, B. LibQUAL+ Spring 2002 Selected Norms, (2002).

old.libqual.org

interpretation framework 2
Interpretation Framework #2

Benchmarking Against Self, Longitudinally

“Nobodyis more like me than me!”

--Anonymous

old.libqual.org

interpretation framework 3
Interpretation Framework #3

Interpreting Perceived Scores Against Minimally-Acceptable and Desired Service Levels (i.e., “Zones of Tolerance”)

old.libqual.org

libqual resources
LibQUAL+® Resources
  • LibQUAL+® Web site:

http://old.libqual.org

  • Publications:

http://old.libqual.org/publications

  • Events and Training:

http://old.libqual.org/events

  • Gap Theory/Radar Graph Introduction:

http://old.libqual.org/Information/Tools/libqualpresentation.cfm

  • LibQUAL+® Procedures Manual:

http://old.libqual.org/Publications/index.cfm

old.libqual.org

libqual surveys by type
LibQUAL+® Surveys by Type

old.libqual.org

* 2007 data reflects Session I data only

libqual languages
LibQUAL+® Languages

old.libqual.org

libqual surveys by language
LibQUAL+® Surveys by Language

old.libqual.org

* 2007 data reflects Session I data only

libqual surveys by consortia
LibQUAL+® Surveys by Consortia

old.libqual.org

* 2007 data reflects Session I data only

libqual surveys by consortia cont d
LibQUAL+® Surveys by Consortia(cont’d)

old.libqual.org

* 2007 data reflects Session I data only

participating libraries by country
Participating Libraries by Country

old.libqual.org

* 2007 data reflects Session I data only

why is your library participating in libqual
Why is Your Library Participating in LibQUAL+® ?
  • Institutional goals:
    • what do you want to get out of the survey?
  • Survey requirements:
    • people, supplies, technology

old.libqual.org

get permission from your institutional review board
Get Permission from your Institutional Review Board
  • Local group that approves human subject research
  • May also be called
    • Committee for Human Subject Research
    • Committee for the Protection of Human Subjects
  • Not all institutions need to obtain permission

old.libqual.org

get permission from your institutional review board1
Get Permission from yourInstitutional Review Board
  • If permission is required:
    • Seek well in advance of survey
    • Supply a copy of the survey, if requested
    • Inform them that results will be shared among participants
  • No need to inform LibQUAL+® of decision

old.libqual.org

determine whom to survey
Determine Whom to Survey
  • Random sample

or

  • Entire population

old.libqual.org

if you sample
If You Sample…
  • Recommendations:
    • At least 1,200 random email addresses for each user group
    • Separate sample groups for undergraduates, graduates, faculty, and staff
    • Think about survey fatigue if you want to repeat the survey regularly
  • Keep notes on your methodology as you will be asked to describe it in the Post Hoc Questionnaire

old.libqual.org

if you survey the entire population
If You Survey the Entire Population….
  • Recommendations:
    • Think about survey fatigue if you want to repeat the survey regularly
  • Keep notes on your methodology as you will be asked to describe it in the Post Hoc Questionnaire

old.libqual.org

obtain email addresses
Obtain Email Addresses
  • Typical sources include:
    • Campus computing office
    • Campus administrative records office
    • Library patron database

old.libqual.org

marketing your survey
Marketing Your Survey
  • Place ads in campus newspaper
  • Write article for library newsletter
  • Post flyers around campus
  • Present at faculty meetings & student orientations
  • Create a survey Web site and feature on library’s home page
  • Take the survey to where users are: dining halls, study rooms, dorms

old.libqual.org

become familiar with libqual resources
Become Familiar with LibQUAL+® Resources
  • Management Center

http://www.libqual.org/Manage/index.cfm

  • LibQUAL+® Procedures Manual

http://www.libqual.org/Manual/index.cfm

    • Updated Version – September 2006
    • Much more detail
  • Discussion list

LIBQUAL-L@listserv.tamu.edu

old.libqual.org

survey process manage your survey
Survey Process: Manage Your Survey

Eight Sections:

  • Preferences
  • Customization
  • Preview
  • Representativeness
  • Monitor Survey Progress
  • Incentive Winners
  • Post Hoc
  • Evaluation

*Sections must be completed in order

old.libqual.org

preferences
Preferences

Fields marked with * are required

old.libqual.org

customization disciplines
Customization: Disciplines
  • Results notebooks summarize findings by user group and provide a chart for, both, standard and custom disciplines
  • Standard disciplines (based on your institution type, i.e., College/University)
  • Customized disciplines
    • Recommend no more than 16 disciplines, if possible

old.libqual.org

the standard disciplines college university
Agriculture/Environmental Studies

Architecture

Business

Communications/ Journalism

Education

Engineering/Computer Science

General Studies

Health Sciences

Humanities

Law

Military/Naval Science

Other

Performing & Fine Arts

Science/Math

Social Sciences/ Psychology

Undecided

The Standard Disciplines – College/University

old.libqual.org

customized disciplines
Customized Disciplines
  • Use your local terminology to map to the standard disciplines
  • Cautions:
    • Need to provide representativeness data for each discipline
    • Too many choices present challenges to users

old.libqual.org

customization branch libraries
Customization: Branch Libraries

The library you use most often.

old.libqual.org

previewing and approving your survey
Preview

Complete at least one full run of your preview survey

Test in different settings, using different platforms and Web browsers

Get library staff involved in testing

Approved

Can no longer make changes

Live survey URL will appear at the top of the “Manage Your Survey” page marked as Survey URL

Previewing and ApprovingYour Survey

old.libqual.org

reviewing comments
Reviewing Comments
  • About one-half of users include comments on their survey
  • Download via the Monitor Survey Progress page (Excel file or text file)

http://old.libqual.org/Manage/Results/Comments/index.cfm

old.libqual.org

sending reminders
Sending Reminders
  • 3-5 reminders to sample populations
  • Thank respondents who have completed the survey
  • Boost up marketing efforts around campus
    • More fliers, table tents, ads in campus newspaper
    • Get professors and other staff involved
    • Increase number or types of incentives

* More examples of marketing efforts featured at the Share Fair

old.libqual.org

completing your representativeness questionnaire
Completing Your Representativeness Questionnaire
  • Determines how your institutional profile compares to your survey data
  • Requires the following information:
    • # of individuals per user group
    • # of individuals within each discipline
    • # of males and females
    • Library Statistics
      • Volumes added during the year – Gross/Total (including e-books)
      • Total number of current serials received (including electronic serials)
      • Total library expenditures (U.S. dollars)
      • Personnel – professional staff, full-time equivalent (FTE)
      • Personnel – support staff, full-time equivalent (FTE)
  • Must be complete BEFORE closing survey

old.libqual.org

completing your representativeness questionnaire1
Completing Your Representativeness Questionnaire

Representativeness Completed

Representativeness NOT Completed

old.libqual.org

closing your survey
Closing Your Survey
  • We recommend a survey run of at three weeks
  • Once you close your survey:
    • Retrieve list of incentive winners
    • Fill out Post Hoc and Evaluation Questionnaires

old.libqual.org

completing post hoc and evaluation questionnaires
Post Hoc Questionnaire

Information about your survey

Sample size

# of e-mails sent

#of invalid e-mail addresses

Incentives offered

Marketing techniques

Etc.

Evaluation Questionnaire

Feedback about your LibQUAL+® experience

All survey liaisons and assistants are encouraged to complete this questionnaire

Completing Post Hoc and Evaluation Questionnaires

old.libqual.org

summary and closure

Summary and Closure

old.libqual.org

libqual resources1
LibQUAL+® Resources
  • LibQUAL+® Web site:

http://old.libqual.org

  • Publications:

http://old.libqual.org/publications

  • Events and Training:

http://old.libqual.org/events

  • Gap Theory/Radar Graph Introduction:

http://old.libqual.org/Information/Tools/libqualpresentation.cfm

  • LibQUAL+® Procedures Manual:

http://old.libqual.org/Publications/index.cfm

old.libqual.org

the libqual team
The LibQUAL+® Team
  • MaShana Davis

Technical Communications Liaison

mashana@arl.org

  • Yolanda Glass

Administrative Assistant

yolanda@arl.org

  • Kristina Justh

Customer Relations Coordinator

kristina@arl.org

  • Martha Kyrillidou

Director, Statistics and Service Quality Programs

martha@arl.org

  • Khyati Nayak

Senior Applications Developer

khyati@arl.org

  • Gary Roebuck

Technical Operations Manager

gary@arl.org

old.libqual.org