120 likes | 332 Views
2. NOLSC involvement in:Logistics PlanningForce Deployment Planning
E N D
2. 2 NOLSC involvement in:
Logistics Planning
Force Deployment Planning & Execution (FDP&E) Agenda
3. 3 Logistics Planning -101 Definition…
Coordinate execution of commander’s guidance
Logistics based on requirements and established priorities
Determine sustainment requirements based on operational plans, forces and equipment
Review lessons learned data bases for unique insights and problem areas
Consider IA tasking
Logistics plans should anticipate contingencies
Document, evaluate, train, and exercise the plan
4. 4 NOLSC Log Planners:
Provide SME coordination and support for regional FISC analysis of their capability to support COCOM OPLANs / CONPLANs / FUNCPLANs
Help create supporting plan and develop solutions for shortfalls (Log Support CONOPS / Annex D / TPFDD)
Value Added:
Directly links NAVSUP supporting role to the Warfighter
Tie-in with CTF x3’s
Examples: C2F – Migration Scenarios Support
FISC Yoko Log Support CONPLAN What are we doing…for the Warfighter
5. 5
6. 6 NOLSC Reserves currently aligned by AOR:
NORTHCOM / SOUTHCOM / PACOM
CENTCOM / EUCOM (AFRICOM in the near future)
Directly link NAVSUP supporting role to the Warfighter in Exercise and Real World events
Long range engagement plan with FISC’s to develop Logistics Support Plans (LSP’s)
Understanding of service / Joint processes and IT tools critical for success
Use of JOPES and Force Deployment Planning & Execution (FDP&E) directed in DEPORD’s Reserve Alignment in Logistics Planning
7. 7
8. 8 Situation
OEF/OIF SAAM message request highlighted inconsistencies with execution of joint deployment processes (DEPORDS direct the use of JOPES)
Updated process hinted at additional opportunities
Inconsistent application of standard joint processes
Potential training gap
Validated hypothesis thru “Science Project”
HCS-4 Test Bed
Historical Analysis
What we found
Unit Move processes not standardized
Need for tactical unit load embarkation skills
Lack of published unit movement and service-level FDP&E policies Issues
No Service FDP&E Policies/Procedures
No Service-level process ownership
No TUCHA/LFF update process
TUCHA/LFF Data Largely Outdated or Nonexistent
Navy requirements not reflected in system and process changes
No standardized Unit Movement process and procedures
No automated data flow
Operational Impacts
Cost wise execution… NO
Degraded joint logistics support
Loss of visibility
Delayed/cancelled transportation
Risk of missing RDD (mission impact)
9. 9 Drafting FDP&E policy and guidance manuals
Leading FDP&E Working Group in NECE sponsored Cross Functional Team #3
Establishing Strategic Mobility Office to support Fleet Commander deployment operations
Developing standardized deployment processes
Developing solutions to fix the outdated TUCHA and LFF issues
10. 10 Real World Operations
Pakistan Relief Effort
Lebanon NEO
Katrina / Rita Relief Exercise Participation
Ardent Sentry
JTFEX
UFL / Terminal Fury
11. 11 Joint Planning Orientation Course (JPOC)
JOPES Support Personnel Course (JSPC)
JOPES Action Officer Course (JAOC)
Joint Force Requirements Generator (JFROG II)
Transportation Coordinator’s Automated Information for Movement System (TC-AIMS)
Automated Manifest System Tactical (AMS-TAC)
Info Work Space (IWS)
Global Transportation Network (GTN)
Strategic Mobility System (SMS)
12. 12
13. 13