1 / 16

MDT Performance with 2012 Collision Data Content of the CONF-NOTE

MDT Performance with 2012 Collision Data Content of the CONF-NOTE. Mauro Iodice Muon Week – Muon Performance Meeting, May 15 th , 2013. Introduction. Writing/Finalizing THREE CONF-NOTES is one of the short term objectives of the Muon Analysis Task Force (MATF) Working group:

papina
Download Presentation

MDT Performance with 2012 Collision Data Content of the CONF-NOTE

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. MDT Performance with 2012 Collision Data Content of the CONF-NOTE Mauro Iodice Muon Week – Muon Performance Meeting, May15th, 2013

  2. Introduction • Writing/Finalizing THREE CONF-NOTES is one of the short term objectives of the Muon Analysis Task Force (MATF) Working group: • -- Alignment CONF-NOTE (main results presented in several talks by Pierre-Francoise) • -- MDT Calibrations CONF-NOTE (previous talk by Mike/Ed) • -- MDT Performance with collision data CONF-NOTE, mainly focusing on: • Resolution • Efficiencies • Dependence with background hit rates In the following: -- list of content and main results for the MDT Performance CONF-Note Most of the material from recent analyses by Xin Fang MANY THANKS ! Mauro Iodice – Muon Week – Performance Meeting, May15th, 2013

  3. MDT Performance Conf Note – Proposed List of Content • MDT tube hit rate Vs Luminosity • -- Tube average hit rates per chamberVs Luminosity • -- Saturationeffectsat high rates??? (seeP.FleischmannMuon Week March 26th) • MDT Resolution Vs DriftRadius • -- Tube hit Residuals: Establishfitting procedure • -- Resolution: Definition and methods • -- Resolutionmeasurement for differenttypes of chambers • -- Comparisonamongdifferentmethods • -- Comparison of results with differenttrackpTselection: checkresults with curvedsegmentsfitsatlowpT • -- Dependence with tube hit rates • Efficiencies • -- Definition (Hardware efficiency / segmentreconstructionefficiency) • -- EfficienciesVs radius for differenttypes of chambers • -- Dependence with tube hit rate • Comparison with simulation (ifavailable/feasible) • startingproject on possibleagingeffects of MDT tubes Vs Integratedluminosity from MDT chargeresponse (ADC) of the tubes Vs time (and Vs position, i.e. occupancy Mauro Iodice – Muon Week – Performance Meeting, May15th, 2013

  4. For <L> ~ 3.8 1033 cm-2s-1 MDT Hit Rates (Hz/tube) Highest rates on EIL1 chambers 37.5 KHz/tube TDC BarrelA TDC EndcapA Compute average tube hit rate per chamber counting “out of time” hits in TDC spectra per chamber (and divide by num. tubes) Hz/tube • <LUMINOSITY> ~ 3.8 1033 cm-2s-1 Mauro Iodice – Muon Week – Performance Meeting, May15th, 2013

  5. MDT Hit RatesNormalized to Unit area (Hz/cm2) Average rate per tube per chamber normalized to average tube length x 3cm Hz/cm2 Highest rates on EIL/S chambers ~ 44 Hz/cm2 • <LUMINOSITY> ~ 3.8 1033 cm-2s-1 Mauro Iodice – Muon Week – Performance Meeting, May15th, 2013

  6. MDT Resolution Vs DriftRadius MDT Resolution can be obtained by straighttrackfitting (segment) from “residualwidths” s(r) and extrapolationerrors: Can also be obtained by the geometricmean of biased and unbiasedhit “residualwidths” ( NIM A538 (2005) 372-383 ) • Residualdistribution  establishfittingfunction • Define “residualwidth” Mauro Iodice – Muon Week – Performance Meeting, May15th, 2013

  7. MDT Resolution – Fitting of Residuals • Non gaussian shape close to the wire • Fit at different radii with Double Gaussian • (small contribution from non-core gaussian for r>2mm) • Residual Width = weighted average of large and narrow gaussians widths: Resolution estimate insensitive to Systematic offset Mauro Iodice – Muon Week – Performance Meeting, May15th, 2013

  8. MDT Resolution – Results Barrel A Barrel C Endcap A Endcap C Mauro Iodice – Muon Week – Performance Meeting, May15th, 2013

  9. MDT Resolution – Results Providedweaccept the fitting procedure and methods, thisisnow an establishedresults. Many cross-checksperformed(can be reported in the CONF-NOTE) Allresults are consitent • Comparison with H8 Test-Beam data – CAVEAT: • Test Beam data takenatfixedangles – betterknowledge of extrapolationerror • Test-Beamresultsobtained with differentresidualfitting procedure • ATLAS Collision data include slewingcorrections (notincluded in TB) Mauro Iodice – Muon Week – Performance Meeting, May15th, 2013

  10. MDT Resolution– Dependence on Hit Rate • The data-sample was analysed in separate “regions” with increasing luminosities • Resolutions for the EIL1 chambers have been estimated (next slides) Mauro Iodice – Muon Week – Performance Meeting, May15th, 2013

  11. EIL1Resolution – Results @ differentLuminosities • Region A • <L> ~ 51033 cm-2s-1 • Region B • <L> ~ 4 1033 cm-2s-1 REGION A • Region C • <L> ~ 3 1033 cm-2s-1 • Region D • <L> ~ 21033 cm-2s-1 NO EVIDENCE OF RESOLUTION DEGRADATION UP TO 5 1033cm-2s-1 (~55 Hz/cm2) Mauro Iodice – Muon Week – Performance Meeting, May15th, 2013

  12. ResolutionDegradation for High Rates …asexpected from Test-Beam under high background rates By S.ZIMMERMANN March 2004 (GIF) Mauro Iodice – Muon Week – Performance Meeting, May15th, 2013

  13. MDT TUBE EFFICIENCY • Definition, method, results in “low background rate” • reported many times (see e.g. Xin at Muon Week March 26th ) An example for Barrel A chambers • In the following, the dependence with background hit rate is reported •  next slide Mauro Iodice – Muon Week – Performance Meeting, May15th, 2013

  14. EIL1Efficiency – Results @ differentLuminosities A DROP IN EFFICIENCY of about 3% isobserved from 2 1033 to 5 1033 From 20 to 50 kHz/tube • Region B • <L> ~ 4 1033 cm-2s-1 • Region A • <L> ~ 51033 cm-2s-1 • Region C • <L> ~ 3 1033 cm-2s-1 • Region D • <L> ~ 21033 cm-2s-1

  15. Efficiencydrop with Tube Hit Rate • Good agreement with extrapolated efficiency from tube hit rates and a ~750 ns dead-time after each hit Measured Extrapolation with tube hit rate Mauro Iodice – Muon Week – Performance Meeting, May15th, 2013

  16. Summary • Results on MDT performance studies with 2012 data mature for a CONF-Note • Background hit rates: need re-analyses on different runs/Lumi (easy) • Resolution studies: • -- Procedure established • -- Resolution measured with two methods agree • -- No degradation of resolution observed up to a tube hit rate of ~55 Hz/cm2 (as expected) • Efficiency studies: • -- Procedure established • -- Drop in efficiency observed in the Endcap Inner chambers (mainly EIL1 – following the expectations) • -- Map of efficiencies per chambers to be done • Comparison with simulations: • -- Not started yet. Need to check available data sample quality/feasibility/reliability

More Related