1 / 8

A Tool Vendor View on ITU-T Language Standardization

A Tool Vendor View on ITU-T Language Standardization. Anders Ek. Why Standards?. Money!!! Following a standard is a sales argument. Sometimes even a requirement. Customer’s view. More than one tool Cheaper Safer (can switch tools) Training costs

pape
Download Presentation

A Tool Vendor View on ITU-T Language Standardization

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. A Tool Vendor View on ITU-T Language Standardization Anders Ek

  2. Why Standards? • Money!!! • Following a standard is a sales argument. • Sometimes even a requirement

  3. Customer’s view • More than one tool • Cheaper • Safer (can switch tools) • Training costs • Wide-spread standard better than proprietory solution • Same notation in many teams • Subcontractors / joint development • Import / export • Standardized protocols / APIs / applications • Cheaper development

  4. Telelogic and Language Standards • SDL since 1984 • MSC since 1992 • TTCN-2 since 1990 • TTCN-3 since 2002 • UML since 1999 • UML-2 since 2002

  5. Language Wars 1 • Early 90s: SDL vs LOTUS • SDL winner • Graphics • Easier to understand • Industrial strength tools

  6. Language Wars 2 • Late 90s: • SDL vs UML • UML winner • Marketing: UML better known (in particular in US) • More books, more tools, more conferences, more ads ... • Broader application area • Applicable to early phases • But if we lost, how come we’re still here?

  7. Telelogic Solution • Basics: SDL & SDL tools are good! • ...but not enough. • 2000 • Co-existance SDL / UML • SDL-2000: UML harmonization • 2002 • One integrated language • UML-2 ongoing • 2004 • SDL profile? • ITU / ETSI acceptance?

  8. Telelogic Standardization Priorites • SDL profile (”SDL part of UML”) • MSC profile • Application standards using the SDL profile • Outside ITU • UML-2 finished (”UML compatible with SDL”) • SysML (systems engineering profile)

More Related