E N D
1. Loudoun County Adult Drug Treatment Court
Washington/Baltimore HIDTA Conference
Hyattsville, Maryland
March 11, 2010
Introduction
Introduction
2. What is a “Drug Court?”
Specialized court docket focused on non-violent, substance abusing offenders
Based on a national model and best practices
Coordinated effort among many agencies
Goal: Break the cycle of substance abuse, addiction & associated crime Docket is within existing court docket 8 AM every Wednesday morning
What makes DC different?
Regular judicial intervention, using sanctions & incentives which stresses certainty and immediacy
Team approach—non adversarialDocket is within existing court docket 8 AM every Wednesday morning
What makes DC different?
Regular judicial intervention, using sanctions & incentives which stresses certainty and immediacy
Team approach—non adversarial
3. Why a Drug Court? Began in Miami-Dade County, FL in 1989
Due to dockets overwhelmed with drug offenders
Why in Loudoun
Dockets overwhelmed with repeat drug offenders
Benefits
Public health
Public safety
Cost savings
Saves lives
4. Basic Components of Drug Court The Drug Court program combines intensive
judicial supervision with substance abuse
treatment. The program includes:
Regularly scheduled Drug Court sessions
Intensive Probation supervision
Substance abuse treatment
Random drug testing
Other services as needed Other services:
DC offenders have variety of issues:
Family treatment
Housing
Transportation
Employment/Education
HealthOther services:
DC offenders have variety of issues:
Family treatment
Housing
Transportation
Employment/Education
Health
5. How are Drug Courts Different? Traditional
Individual agency services
Probation or jail
Repeated failures
Drug court
Collaboration
Cooperation
Jail diversion
National model-best practices
6. Drug Court Team Circuit Court
Office of the Commonwealth’s Attorney
Criminal Defense Bar
Community Corrections Program
Sheriff’s Office
Mental Health, Substance Abuse and Developmental Services
Probation and Parole
7. Drug Court Partners Clerk of the Circuit Court
OAR of Fairfax County, Inc.
Loudoun Aftercare Program
Department of Family Services
Virginia Alcohol Monitoring
Residential Treatment Providers
Homeless Shelters
Community members/volunteers
8. The participant must:
Reside in Loudoun County
Be a non-violent offender and may not be on probation for a Felony DUI
Be alcohol or drug dependent
Be on supervised probation with a pending Probation Violation that is due to their alcohol or drug dependency
The Drug Court Team must unanimously approve each participant’s entrance into the program.
Most dispose of all pending charges before entrance into DC.Most dispose of all pending charges before entrance into DC.
9. Who are Drug Court Participants? Eligibility:
Nonviolent
Addicts
Felony PV
Loudoun resident
Participants:
180 screened
76 entered
15 graduated
Underlying offenses:
55% drug
43% property
2% other
Gender
55% male
45% female
Age
Range of 19 to 58
2009:
Male-67%
Female-33%
Race:
73% White
21% Black/African American
3% Black and White
3% Multi-race2009:
Male-67%
Female-33%
Race:
73% White
21% Black/African American
3% Black and White
3% Multi-race
10. Entry Process Probation Officer alleges Probation Violation has occurred
Probation Violation letter is written to the Court
Drug Court Pre-screening form completed
Case is placed on Drug Court docket
1st Appearance in Drug Court
Defense Counsel appointed, if necessary
Assessment for eligibility completed by Mental Health/Substance Abuse Services
Drug Court Team reviews case
If eligible:
Concedes and/or found in violation of probation
Begins Drug Court Program the same day
If ineligible:
Case is continued to standard Probation Violation processing
11. Communication Monday staffing
Team staffing
Court
Daily contacts
Access to Judges
12. Phase 1(90 days) Weekly
Drug Court
3 substance abuse treatment groups
30 AA/NA in the first 30 days, 4 per week thereafter (to include 1 per weekend day)
3 urine screens and random screens
2 meetings with Probation Officer
Full time employment, education or community service
10PM to 5AM curfew
Obtain a sponsor
Obtain stable housing
Submit Participation Fee
60 consecutive days of abstinence from drugs and alcohol
13. Phase 2 (90 days) Drug Court every other week
Weekly
3 substance abuse treatment groups
4 AA/NA meetings per week (to include 1 per weekend day)
2 urine screens and random screens
1 meeting with Probation Officer
Full time employment, education or community service
Maintain weekly contact with sponsor
Maintain stable housing
Progress towards payment of costs, fines, fees and restitution
90 consecutive days of abstinence from drugs and alcohol
14. Phase 3 (90 days) Drug Court every three weeks
Weekly
2 substance abuse treatment groups
4 AA/NA meetings per week (to include 1 per weekend day)
1 urine screen and random screens
Meeting with Probation Officer every other week
Full time employment, education or community service
Maintain weekly contact with sponsor
Maintain stable housing
Progress towards payment of costs, fines, fees and restitution
120 consecutive days of abstinence from drugs and alcohol
15. Phase 4(90 days) Drug Court every three weeks
1 substance abuse treatment group per week
4 AA/NA meetings per week (to include 1 per weekend day)
Random urine screens
1 meeting with Probation Officer
Full time employment, education or community service
Maintain weekly contact with sponsor
Maintain stable housing
Develop an aftercare plan
Progress towards payment of costs, fines, fees and restitution
6 consecutive months of abstinence from drugs and alcohol
Complete all requirements for graduation
16. Graduation Complete all phase requirements
6 months abstinence from drugs and alcohol
Positive treatment summary
No new felony arrests
No new Class 1 or 2 misdemeanor arrests
Agree to participate in follow-up interviews
Recommendation of the Drug Court Team
Upon program graduation, a participant may be continued on supervised probation.
17. Aftercare Fills the 6-month gap between graduation and termination of probation
Phase IV participants integrated into aftercare by attending monthly
Focuses on reinforcing gains in recovery and Step work.
18. Termination Voluntary by participant
Decision by Drug Court team
Automatic expulsion
Possession of firearm
Absconding for more than 14 consecutive days
Not attending treatment or court for 14 consecutive days
Arrest on new felony offense or arrest for new Class 1 or 2 misdemeanor offenses
Possession of drugs or alcohol on court, probation or treatment property
Moving outside of Loudoun County, VA
Committing an act of physical violence while in the program
Upon termination from the program, the case will be returned to the normal docket for sentencing on the Probation Violation.
19. SANCTIONS & REQUIREMENTS
Reprimand from the Court
Writing assignments
Demotion to an earlier phase
Community service hours
Increased frequency of drug testing and probation meetings
Increased frequency of treatment sessions and AA/NA meetings
Individual treatment sessions
Travel restrictions
Curfew restrictions
SCRAM
GPS Monitoring
Residential/inpatient treatment
Incarceration
Termination
20. INCENTIVES
Promotion to next Phase
Praise from the Court and Team
Certificates of recognition
Medallions
Gift certificates
Movie passes
Program Graduation
Meditation Books, Coffee Mugs, Holiday Celebrations More detailed incentive program funded by grant in development: research says ratio should be 1 sanction to 3 incentivesMore detailed incentive program funded by grant in development: research says ratio should be 1 sanction to 3 incentives
21. Drug Court Fees & Costs to the Participants Program fee
Paid to Drug Court
$100 one-time only
Treatment fee
Paid to Loudoun County Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services on a weekly basis
Based on a sliding scale
Fee amount may change with changing programmatic needs.
Generally to offset costs of urine screens and to help fund incentives.Fee amount may change with changing programmatic needs.
Generally to offset costs of urine screens and to help fund incentives.
22. Mental Health & Substance Abuse Services “Menu” of services
Intake process
Risk/needs assessment
Evidence based clinical models
Integrated system
Treatment outcomes
23. Mental Health & Substance Abuse Services Services
-Therapeutic Case Management
-Individual and Group Therapy
-Psychiatric and Medication Management Services
-On-site and laboratory confirmation Etoh and drug testing
-Supervised Apartment Services (Space limited)
-Contracted detox and residential tx
24. Intake Process Clinical assessment
Based on form used by Henrico Drug Court
Interview with client
Collateral information
Loudoun County Mental Health Comprehensive
Bio-psycho-social
Includes risk/needs assessment
DRS-2
25. Mental Health & Substance Abuse Services Clinical Models
-MRT
-SFT
-CBT
-Gender based groups
-Domestic Violence group (Duluth Model)
-Multi Family/Support group
-Co-occurring services -grounded in the concept that addiction is an illness of the body, mind and spirit
-content of our tx interventions have traditionally been consistent with 12-step programs with a primary focus on steps 1-5.
-SFT allows us to apply the general therapeutic principles in many other ways than those delineated in the manual.
-can be intermixed with other tx strategies
-abstinence based model
-goal to foster clt’s commitment to participate in 12-step recovery.-grounded in the concept that addiction is an illness of the body, mind and spirit
-content of our tx interventions have traditionally been consistent with 12-step programs with a primary focus on steps 1-5.
-SFT allows us to apply the general therapeutic principles in many other ways than those delineated in the manual.
-can be intermixed with other tx strategies
-abstinence based model
-goal to foster clt’s commitment to participate in 12-step recovery.
26. Moral Reconation Therapy Dr. Gregory L. Little
Dr. Kenneth D. Robinson
120 + outcome studies
Reconation
27. Twelve Step Facilitation Therapy Stanford University study
50 yr. longitudinal study by George Vaillant (1983)
NIAAA’s Project MATCH (1997)
-(Stanford U) found that a 12-Step oriented tx program boosted two year sobriety rates by 30 percent over other modalities.
-(Vaillant) the # of AA meetings attended in the first year of sobriety correlates with abstinence.
-although CBT, MET and SFT all produced equivalent main effects on post tx drinking outcomes, the SFT by low ASI psychiatric severity interaction proved to be the only statistically significant predicted outcome of Project MATCH.
-grounded in concept that addiction is an illness of body, mind and spirit.
-content of our tx interventions have traditionally been consistent with 12-step programs.
-primary focus on steps 1-5.
-allows us to apply the general therapeutic principles in many other ways than those delineated in the manual.
-can be intermixed with other tx strategies.
-abstinence model.
-goal to foster clt’s commitment to participate in 12-step recovery.
-(Stanford U) found that a 12-Step oriented tx program boosted two year sobriety rates by 30 percent over other modalities.
-(Vaillant) the # of AA meetings attended in the first year of sobriety correlates with abstinence.
-although CBT, MET and SFT all produced equivalent main effects on post tx drinking outcomes, the SFT by low ASI psychiatric severity interaction proved to be the only statistically significant predicted outcome of Project MATCH.
-grounded in concept that addiction is an illness of body, mind and spirit.
-content of our tx interventions have traditionally been consistent with 12-step programs.
-primary focus on steps 1-5.
-allows us to apply the general therapeutic principles in many other ways than those delineated in the manual.
-can be intermixed with other tx strategies.
-abstinence model.
-goal to foster clt’s commitment to participate in 12-step recovery.
28. Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Based on principles of social learning theory
Goals:
Overcome skills deficits
Increase client’s ability to cope with high relapse risk situations in relationships and with mood states
-views etoh and drug use as functionally related to major problems in the person’s life.
-views etoh and drug use as functionally related to major problems in the person’s life.
29. Gender Based Groups CSAT Treatment Improvement Protocol
(TIP 44) For Adults in the Criminal Justice System
CSAT Technical Assistance Publication
(TAP 23) Substance Abuse Treatment for Women Offenders: Guide to Promising Practices
-literature reviewed (p. 96) reports that among incarcerated women, the longer the clt stayed in women’s tx program the less likely she was to re-offend
-sites that evidence shows (p. 3) that effective tx programming does empower addicted women offenders to overcome their substance abuse, to lead a crime-free life, and to become productive citizens.
-a review of current knowledge in a report by Brady and Ashley (2005) Women in Substance Abuse tx: results from the Etoh and drug services study suggests that programming with wraparound services, women-only tx and workshops addressing women-focused topics can be beneficial.
-positive tx outucomes included decreased use, increased tx retention, improved perinatal/birht outcomes and prenatal care, improements in self-esteem and depression-literature reviewed (p. 96) reports that among incarcerated women, the longer the clt stayed in women’s tx program the less likely she was to re-offend
-sites that evidence shows (p. 3) that effective tx programming does empower addicted women offenders to overcome their substance abuse, to lead a crime-free life, and to become productive citizens.
-a review of current knowledge in a report by Brady and Ashley (2005) Women in Substance Abuse tx: results from the Etoh and drug services study suggests that programming with wraparound services, women-only tx and workshops addressing women-focused topics can be beneficial.
-positive tx outucomes included decreased use, increased tx retention, improved perinatal/birht outcomes and prenatal care, improements in self-esteem and depression
30. Multi Family/Support Groups CSAT Treatment Improvement Protocol (TIP 39) Substance Abuse Treatment and Family Therapy
Increases engagement and retention in treatment
Reduces client’s drug/etoh use
Improves family and social functioning
Discourages relapse
-evidence indicates (Stanton et al.1982) that SA tx that includes family therapy works better than SA tx that does not.
-selected research outcomes of family work in SA tx pg 10-11
-evidence indicates (Stanton et al.1982) that SA tx that includes family therapy works better than SA tx that does not.
-selected research outcomes of family work in SA tx pg 10-11
31. Co-Occurring Services CSAT Treatment Improvement Protocol
(TIP 42) For Persons with Co-Occurring Disorders
-identifies research that clearly demonstrates that SA tx of clt’s with co-occurring mental illness and substance use disorders can be beneficial
-identifies research that clearly demonstrates that SA tx of clt’s with co-occurring mental illness and substance use disorders can be beneficial
32. Treatment Outcomes General Population vs. Drug Court Population
Length of Stay
Abstinence
Deeper engagement in 12-step recovery
DRS-2 Results
33. Supervision: Community Corrections & Sheriff’s Office Team Supervision Model
Field (Deputy) vs. Office (Probation Officer)
Intake
Advised of rules and review handbook
Drug screen
Client provides self-report of personal, criminal, and drug history
Photographed
Criminal and driving records reviewed
34. Supervision: Community Corrections Regular probation appointments in the office
Verify employment and community service hours, as well as income
Set up and monitor payment plans for court costs, fines, and restitution
Verify completion of sanctions
Complete weekly reports and submit to Drug Court Team and Judges
Referrals for service: Family services, SCRAM, VASAP, etc.
35. Supervision: Sheriff’s Office Pre-Entry Home Inspection
Home and Employment Checks
Curfew Enforcement
Alcohol Breath Test
Warrant Service
36. Supervision: Community Corrections & Sheriff’s Office Drug testing protocols:
Redi-Test Dip Strips
Breath test
Test observed by same sex
2 test to confirm positive results
Over-The-Counter and Prescription Drug Policy
12 Drugs Tested
Cocaine
Opiates
THC
Amphetamine
Methamphetamine
Benzodiazepines
PCP
Oxycodone
Barbituates
Ecstasy
Methadone
Buprenorphine
37. OAR of Fairfax County, Inc. OAR of Fairfax: Opportunities, Alternatives, and Resources
Provide employment focused case management services including assisting clients with obtaining identification, employment applications, resume and cover letter development, interview preparation, and job search and retention skills.
Make client referrals for service to community based organizations for needs such as food, clothing, housing, and healthcare.
Facilitate a 12 week life skills class on topics including employment development, budgeting, nutrition, and stress management.
Utilize community resources to build relationships with potential employers.
38. Benefits and Outcomes Employed-live & most work in Loudoun
Pay taxes-including back taxes
Pay court costs/restitution
Pay treatment fees
Pay program fee
Pay child support-garnishments/payments
Pay off debts-become self-supporting/sustaining Complete community service: over 3,000 hrs
Drug free babies: 4
Education: GED & college
Public health: deal w/health issues
Diversion from incarceration: DOC issues
Recidivism
39. Evaluations HIDTA
CSAT- Westat (Cross-site evaluation)
SAMHSA-GPRA
Virginia: Supreme Court of Virginia
Local: Process, outcome and cost benefit evaluations underway by Transformation Systems Incorporated
JLARC—Joint Legislative Audit & Review Commission (2008) “the adverse effects of substance abuse impose significant costs on the State and localities, totaling at least $613 million in 2006.”
Substance use disorder treatment programming appears to “frequently reduce costs to the state & locality as well as improve public safey & economic benefits”
“drug court completers experienced significantly better outcomes in the criminal justice system after treatment ended than 3 comparison groups” particularly in recidivism & employment categories
3 groups: drug court non-completers, State probation treatment completers, and Jail treatment completers
Non-drug court completers demonstrated better recidivism rates than did state probation treatment completers
JLARC—Joint Legislative Audit & Review Commission (2008) “the adverse effects of substance abuse impose significant costs on the State and localities, totaling at least $613 million in 2006.”
Substance use disorder treatment programming appears to “frequently reduce costs to the state & locality as well as improve public safey & economic benefits”
“drug court completers experienced significantly better outcomes in the criminal justice system after treatment ended than 3 comparison groups” particularly in recidivism & employment categories
3 groups: drug court non-completers, State probation treatment completers, and Jail treatment completers
Non-drug court completers demonstrated better recidivism rates than did state probation treatment completers
40. Program Barriers Housing
Transportation
Employment
Child care
Healthcare
Referrals
41. Funding Local:
Four positions are funded by the Board of Supervisors
State:
Drug courts were recognized in VA Code § 18.2-254.1 as of July 1, 2004
Currently there are no state funds for new drug courts in Virginia
Federal:
Drug Court grants are provided by several Federal agencies
Diversifying:
Future plans for a non-profit to support the program Advocacy is needed at all levels to ensure the program is continued and potentially expanded in the future.
Local, state & federal legislators need to hear support.Advocacy is needed at all levels to ensure the program is continued and potentially expanded in the future.
Local, state & federal legislators need to hear support.
42. Contact Information
Michelle White
Program Coordinator
703-737-8212
Michelle.White@loudoun.gov
Or visit:
http://www.loudoun.gov/
Invite to both regular & graduation to see feel good and internal struggle, growth & change of participants’ lives
Invite to both regular & graduation to see feel good and internal struggle, growth & change of participants’ lives