1 / 12

HIGH LEVEL FORUM ON AID EFFECTIVENESS, BUSAN

HIGH LEVEL FORUM ON AID EFFECTIVENESS, BUSAN. How to ensure wide and active participation of different stakeholders?. WHO IS INVOLVED IN ENHANCING AID EFFECTIVENESS?. Paris Declaration addressed partner countries and traditional DAC donors.

orson-gilliam
Download Presentation

HIGH LEVEL FORUM ON AID EFFECTIVENESS, BUSAN

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. HIGH LEVEL FORUM ON AID EFFECTIVENESS, BUSAN How to ensure wide and active participation of different stakeholders?

  2. WHO IS INVOLVED IN ENHANCING AID EFFECTIVENESS? • Paris Declaration addressed partner countries and traditional DAC donors. • AAA recognised wide range of partnerships and actors including South-South cooperation, middle-income countries, CSOs and global funds. • Wide participation is not new: objective in Busan is to deepen the engagement of different actors involved in enhancing development results.

  3. NON-TRADITIONAL DAC DONORS • Particular focus is on deeper engagement of China, India and Brazil. • Increasingly important partners, but critical on labels such as ‘donor’ or ‘aid’. Also recipients of ODA. • Possible contributions in Busan: Champions of South-South cooperation. Pragmatic experience on transition to Middle-Income-Country (MIC) status.

  4. PRIVATE SECTOR • Divided into non-profit and for-profit private sector. • Non-profit (global funds) are addressed in AAA (par 19c) • For-profit private sector has experience on how to work with aid (aid as a catalyst, public-private partnerships). • Possible contribution in Busan: deepened commitment to AE (non-profit) and participation in discussion and consensus-building on development partnerships (for-profit).

  5. HOW TO OPERATIONALISE WIDE PARTICIPATION IN BUSAN OUTCOME? • Challenge in Busan: how to combine inclusiveness and ambition. • Ways to operationalise participation: taking part in preparations, taking part in the event, adherence to Busan outcome and commitments. • One solution is to agree on global principles and differentiated responsibilities expressed in the outcome document. • View of partner countries is important but so far partner countries have not been vocal on the wide participation in Busan.

  6. SESSION III: QUESTIONS FOR DISCUSSION • How to combine ambition and inclusiveness in Busan outcome? • Should Busan outcome differentiate responsibilities and commitments between different stakeholders? • What could be the specific contributions of the non-traditional donors and private sector for Busan?

  7. HIGH LEVEL FORUM ON AID EFFECTIVENESS, BUSAN Themes for wider agenda: climate change finance and countries in fragile situations

  8. ADDRESSING AID EFFECTIVENESS IN WIDER DEVELOPMENT CONTEXT • Consensus on addressing aid effectiveness in wider development context in an operational manner. • We have to selective in the themes to be included. Criteria to be used: • added-value • feasibility • political relevance • linkages with ODA • Views of partner countries important but not yet clear.

  9. CLIMATE CHANGE FINANCE • Climate change finance represents significant and growing development finance with complex aid architecture. • EU Council Conclusions on Climate Change (2009) calls special attention to the application of PD and AAA. • ‘Bangkok Call for Action’ (2010) lists aid effectiveness commitments in climate change finance. • Follow-up to Copenhagen/Cancun takes place at the same time as Busan. Cooperation with UNFCCC is important.

  10. COUNTRIES IN FRAGILE SITUATIONS • Countries in fragile situations showcase differentiated country contexts. • Several international inputs: • OECD Principles for Good International Engagement (2007) and their monitoring. • Dili Declaration (2010) • International Dialogue on peacebuilding and statebuilding • EU Council Conclusions on situations of fragility (2007) emphasises division of labour.

  11. CLIMATE CHANGE FINANCE AND SITUATIONS OF FRAGILITY IN BUSAN OUTCOME • Climate Change Finance • Aid Effectiveness principles and commitments for climate change • Agreement on monitoring framework • Providing input to Durban negotiations and beyond • Countries in fragile situations • International objectives on peacebuilding and statebuilding • Agreement on commitments • Agreement on monitoring framework

  12. SESSION III: QUESTIONS FOR DISCUSSION • Should specific principles and commitments on climate change finance and countries in fragile situations be included in the Busan outcome? • How to organise the monitoring of differentiated commitments on climate change finance and countries in fragility? • What else should be included in Busan outcome on the wider development agenda? How could it be addressed in an operational manner?

More Related