1 / 19

Perspectives and Challenges in Training Personnel to Serve Low Incidence Populations: Blindness & Visual Impairment

Perspectives and Challenges in Training Personnel to Serve Low Incidence Populations: Blindness & Visual Impairment. 2006 OSEP Project Directors' Conference Washington, DC Kathleen Mary Huebner, Ph. D. Professor & Associate Dean Pennsylvania College of Optometry

orrick
Download Presentation

Perspectives and Challenges in Training Personnel to Serve Low Incidence Populations: Blindness & Visual Impairment

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Perspectives and Challenges in Training Personnel to Serve Low Incidence Populations: Blindness & Visual Impairment 2006 OSEP Project Directors' ConferenceWashington, DC Kathleen Mary Huebner, Ph. D. Professor & Associate Dean Pennsylvania College of Optometry Director, National Center for Leadership in Visual Impairment

  2. Outline of Presentation • Incidence – “The Count” • Personnel Crisis – Teachers-O&M-Leadership • Complexity & Personnel Preparation Shortage • Teacher & O&M Preparation & Job Requirements • Additional Challenges • Personnel Production • PCO & Other Master’s Degree & Certificate Program Strategies • Leadership Preparation Challenges and NCLVI

  3. Incidence of Visual Impairment • 1 in 500 children has a visual impairment serious enough to be classified as partially sighted • 1 in 1000 can be classified as legally blind • IDEA - .05% of school-age population served as visually impaired

  4. Magnitude of the Inaccurate Count (NCLID)

  5. Based on a recommended 8::1 student-teacher ratio 11,700 teachers + 11,700 O&M specialists needed by 2010 (Mason, Davidson & McNerney, 2000) Annually producing approximately 200 teachers and 90 O&M specialists (http://nclid.unco.edu/newnclid/multiYrSum.php?itemid=613&blogid=131) 14 Active VI Doctoral Programs in US (Ferrell, 2004) Annually producing on average 4 doctorates (http://nclid.unco.edu/newnclid/multiYrSum.php?itemid=613&blogid=131) 72 Leaders with Doctorates needed in next 5 years (Huebner & Wormsley, 2005) The Problem-Personnel Shortage Crisis

  6. New Specialists Per State, 2003-04 • 4.0 Teachers • 2.6 O&M Instructors • .4 Dual-certified Teachers/O&M • .8 Deafblind Teachers (http://nclid.unco.edu/newnclid/state200304.php?itemid=616&blogid=132)

  7. Compensatory Skills, braille, communication modes, etc., Orientation & Mobility Social Interaction Skills Independent Living Skills Recreation and Leisure Skills Career Education Use of Assistive Technology Visual Efficiency Skills Self-Determination (Huebner, Merk-Adam, Stryker, & Wolffe, 2004) Teacher preparation involves: Expanded Core Curriculum (ECC)

  8. Teacher +O&M preparation & work involves: • CEC or ACVREP Competencies • More credit hours • Fieldwork/Practicum & Internships • Addressing needs of 0-21 year old diverse & heterogeneous population of students including those with multiple disabilities • No two alike • Teaching in all types of settings from inclusion public schools, agencies, organizations, private schools, special schools, resource rooms, homebound, itinerant, teacher consultant, private contract, & most often supervised by non-blindness professionals

  9. Some Additional Challenges • Increased demands on teachers, O&M Specialists, & Leadership personnel • Multi-competency programs take more knowledge, skill & time • Research based practices are hard to come by and document • Funding is not keeping up with increased tuition & other costs • Blind & VI children are “devalued” by society & ed. systems • Online programs still a “new teaching and learning” experience • Fewer full-time students (or more full-time employed & often already employed in jobs for which they are being trained) • Implications of “highly qualified” • Recruitment & retention into personnelpreparation & jobs

  10. University Programs in Blindness States in the Northeast Regional Center for Vision Education (n = 6) States with university programsin both TSVI and O&M (n = 11) States with University programs in TSVI (n = 15)

  11. All Personnel Types

  12. New Completers (NCLID)

  13. PCO Strategies – Master and Certificate Programs • Collaboration • Partnerships [OR, OK, WV, OH, MN, TN, GA, MD, IN, PA] • Quality-Programs & Staff • Adherence & beyond to required competencies • Flexibility • Multiple funding sources • Development & production of CDs • On-campus & on-line programs; all on-line programs require some face-to-face classes • Full complement of VI Programs, TVI, O&M, VRT, & LVR promotes degree with multiple certificates

  14. Other Strategies Being Used • New England Regional Approach- • The Northeast Regional Center for Vision Education (NERVE) http://www.nercve.umb.edu/index.php?page=home • Distant education using various strategies; on-line, satellite programs; weekend classes; video; CD ROM; video conferencing, teleconferencing, etc. • National Center for Low-Incidence Disabilities (NCLID)- Data collection and sharing; repository for course materials that can be shared by IHE’s; Information exchange, knowledge advancement, etc. http://nclid.unco.edu/newnclid/index.php

  15. 5 Objectives • Develop theCollaborative Model • Facilitate Preparation of Leadership Personnel • Enrich the Preparation of Leadership Personnel • Evaluate NCLVI-Program and Mode • Disseminate Information about NCLVI Model

  16. NCLVI Collaborating Components

  17. All 14 University Consortium Members with VI Doctoral ProgramsNCLVI 2006-07 Cohort Group of 21

  18. Collaboration at Graduate and Post- Graduate Levels Promotes • Healthy competition vs. cannibalism • Sharing of resources—human, financial, & other • Building a community of practice within & beyond the IHEs • Better use of federal dollars • Greater opportunity for state participation in needs assessment, recruitment, program content, & financial support • One person programs become multi-site, multi-delivery programs increasing learning opportunities for students • Decrease competition – increase professional partnerships • Stronger programs, easy access to variety of human resources with wide range of expertise • Increased likelihood of joint research/national research efforts • Possibly more teachers with higher quality outcomes

  19. For further information: Kathleen Mary Huebner, Ph. D. Professor & Associate Dean Graduate Studies in Vision Impairment PA College of Optometry 8360 Old York Road Elkins Park, PA. 19027National Center for Leadership in Visual Impairmentwww.pco.edu/nclvi.htmorkathyh@pco.edu

More Related