1 / 76

Solar System Astronomy ASTR 111 – Summer 2010

Solar System Astronomy ASTR 111 – Summer 2010. Welcome to Astronomy. Professor Jack Brockway Reed 121 250-6941 brockway@radford.edu www.radford.edu/brockway Office Hours: MWF 10-12. Welcome to Astronomy. ASTR 111 – Solar System Astronomy Lecture McGuffey 203 2:00 – 2:50 MWF

oro
Download Presentation

Solar System Astronomy ASTR 111 – Summer 2010

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Solar System AstronomyASTR 111 – Summer 2010

  2. Welcome to Astronomy • Professor Jack Brockway • Reed 121 • 250-6941 • brockway@radford.edu • www.radford.edu/brockway • Office Hours: • MWF 10-12

  3. Welcome to Astronomy • ASTR 111 – Solar System Astronomy • Lecture • McGuffey 203 • 2:00 – 2:50 MWF • Laboratory • Curie 145 • 7:00 – 9:00 Monday • 9:00 – 11:00 Monday • 8:00 – 10:00 Wednesday

  4. Welcome to Astronomy ALWAYS ASK QUESTIONS!

  5. Welcome to Astronomy There are problems to whose solution I would attach an infinitely greater importance than to those of mathematics, for example touching ethics, or our relation to God, or concerning our destiny and our future; but their solution lies wholly beyond us and completely outside the province of science. — Carl Friedrich Gauss (1777-1855)

  6. Why Science? • I have a theory… • Water causes cancer • Only water causes cancer • Not cigarettes… • Not UV radiation… • Not nothing else… • Who/how it affects cannot be predicted • Now or ever

  7. Why Science? • I have a theory… • Water causes cancer • Only water causes cancer • Who/how it affects cannot be predicted • Evidence: • Every single cancer victim has been exposed to water • Rebutting evidence to the contrary: • Not every lung cancer victim smokes • Not every smoker gets lung cancer

  8. Why Science?

  9. Why Science?

  10. What is Science? • Science is a system of knowledge that is based on empirical evidence and testable explanations • Empirical – we can observe and measure • Testable – we can support or disprove • A theory must be falsifiable • A theory – of any sort – that cannot conceivably fail any test is not science

  11. What is Science? • In science we do not teach… • What might be true • What we believe to be true • Perhaps not even things that are true • We search for, find, and teach the best explanations for nature we can find

  12. What is Science? Science is NOT any conjecture chosen to justify belief – not even popular or widely-held belief

  13. What is Science? • Science is an exploration • Guided by natural law • Explanatory by reference to natural law • Testable against the empirical world • Conclusions are tentative • It is falsifiable

  14. Science vs Authority • Authority often works by suppressing inquiry • favors (or even depends upon) the status quo • Science is subversive • Old ideas can be falsified and rejected • New ideas must be supported by evidence • Scientific authority can be overthrown by new or better evidence • Nature is the arbiter of science. It decides what ideas are good or bad

  15. Science vs Authority • Science provides tools • For separating truth from fiction • Science can only suffer under ideological requirements • Galileo vs Church • Scopes trial • AIDS research • Global Warming • USSR/China – Lysenko

  16. Accepting Science • Many reject science • Astrology • crystal healing • Hostility to Modern Medicine • Vaccines cause autism… or kill • Smoking • Rejection of climate change findings

  17. Accepting Science • Science is not “natural” • The brain is an ever-turning “belief engine” • Full moons are dangerous • 13 is unlucky • Health insurance providers are our friends

  18. Accepting Science • Science is not “natural” • Science requires doubt and skepticism • Society holds unshakeable faith to be a virtue • People seek security and certainty • Faith delivers • Science doesn’t • Science enables us to recognize (and turn away from) incorrect beliefs • To be fair, let’s not assume that scientists are without bias, nor are they always right…

  19. Scientific World View • Which of the following would be a scientific way of viewing nature? • All ideas are equally valuable and should be equally respected • Well established ideas should never be checked or tested • Nature informs us about the usefulness of our ideas

  20. Scientific Method • Knowedge from Science • We think we understand empirical phenomena when a satisfactory theory • explains how the phenomena work, what regular patterns they follow, or why they appear to us as they do • Scientific explanations are in terms of natural phenomena rather than supernatural phenomena • science itself requires neither the acceptance nor the rejection of the supernatural

  21. Scientific Method • Scientific “facts” and theories • many scientific theories, initially, are often little more than guesses based on limited information • mature and well-developed scientific theories systematically organize knowledge and allow us to explain and predict wide ranges of empirical events

  22. Scientific Method • Science • Conclusions are a posteriori • Theory follows observation • Theories are conclusions • a position, opinion, or judgment reached after consideration • Measurable predictions • Key to falsifiability • Falsifiable • We can distinguish between accurate and inaccurate predictions (Precambrian rabbits) • Reproducible

  23. Scientific Pretenders • Pseudoscience • Set of ideas based on theories put forth as scientific when they are not scientific • They are missing one or more of the characteristics of scientific disciplines/theories

  24. Scientific Pretenders • Pseudoscience • Conclusions are a priori • Observations made (often chosen) to confirm theory • Theories are assumptions • Reached without consideration • Conclusions are not conclusions! • Not Falsifiable • Not reproducible • No measurable predictions • Predictions allow competing theories to be compared

  25. Scientific Method • Science makes conclusions • Based on weight of evidence • All the data must be considered • Pseudoscience makes assertions • Not supported by most of the data • Though it might be supported by some of it • I’m being tendentious – look it up 

  26. Our Criteria • A priori or a posteriori? • Did you conclude or did you assume? • Falsifiability • Is it possible to collect contradicting evidence? • Is contradicting evidence considered when available? • Reproducibility • Observable predictions • Science is a tool, not a rationalization

  27. Benefits of Science • What benefit has science provided? • Vaccines • Computers • Anesthetics • Spacecraft • Hydrogen bombs • Women surviving childbirth • Greatly Increased life expectancy • Social/economic prosperity…

  28. Benefits of Science • What benefit has science provided? • Cell Phones • Toilets • Books

  29. Benefits of Rejecting Science • Ignorance • Gullibility

  30. Benefits of Rejecting Science • Astrology • “You’re not going to marry him because she’s a Taurus??” • “You’re quitting your job because Mercury is in Cancer??” • Intelligent Design • ID is an attack against science • Gardisil Debate

  31. Gardisil Debate • Gardisil is a vaccine against HPV virus • HPV is believed to be a necessary factor in the development of nearly all cervical cancer cases • Fifth most deadly cancer in women • Nearly 4000 will die from it this year in the US

  32. Gardisil Debate • Critics say it’s unnecessary or dangerous: • They say the body’s immune system is sufficient 90% of the time, • that it only protects against 4 of over 100 strains of HPV, • that there are serious side effects, • that Gardisil has killed people, • that HPV hasn’t been proven to cause cervical cancer

  33. Gardisil Debate • Facts suggest otherwise: • the body’s immune system is sufficient 90% of the time • ..and fails 10% of the time • It protects against 4 (of over 100 strains) of HPV • there are side effects • People have died that were taking Gardisil • HPV hasn’t been proven to cause cervical cancer

  34. Gardisil Debate • Facts suggest otherwise: • the body’s immune system is sufficient 90% of the time • It only protects against 4 (of over 100 strains) of HPV • But 2 of those 4 are responsible for over 70% of cases • 38% effective against 10 other strains (>2/3 remaining cases) • there are side effects • People have died that were taking Gardisil • HPV hasn’t been proven to cause cervical cancer

  35. Gardisil Debate • Facts suggest otherwise: • the body’s immune system is sufficient 90% of the time • it protects against 4 (of over 100 strains) of HPV • there are side effects • About half of the adverse effects that most drugs have • People have died that were taking Gardisil • HPV hasn’t been proven to cause cervical cancer

  36. Gardisil Debate • Facts suggest otherwise: • the body’s immune system is sufficient 90% of the time • it protects against 4 (of over 100 strains) of HPV • there are side effects • People have died that were taking Gardisil • People have also died that were taking Tylenol, were sleeping, or were sitting in chairs • No evidence has shown a link between the drug and the deaths (at least not yet) • About 40 people out of 40 million recipients have died • HPV hasn’t been proven to cause cervical cancer

  37. Gardisil Debate • Facts suggest otherwise: • the body’s immune system is sufficient 90% of the time • it protects against 4 (of over 100 strains) of HPV • there are side effects • People have died that were taking Gardisil • HPV hasn’t been proven to cause cervical cancer • But the link is far stronger than for smoking and lung cancer… • Each year in the US • Nearly 4000 die from cervical cancer • Gardisil can prevent over 3000 of those deaths

  38. Benefits of Rejecting Science • Astrology • Intelligent Design • Gardisil Debate • Population control

  39. Fact vs theory This textbook contains material on evolution. Evolution is a theory, not a fact, regarding the origin of living things. This material should be approached with an open mind, studied carefully, and critically considered. – sticker in Cobb County GA

  40. Fact vs Theory • No real difference… • Theories are typically considered to be less developed/established In science, “fact” can only mean “confirmed to such a degree that it would be perverse to withhold provisional assent.” – Stephen Gould

  41. Scientific “fact” This textbook contains material on evolution. Evolution is a theory, not a fact, regarding the origin of living things. This material should be approached with an open mind, studied carefully, and critically considered. – sticker in Cobb County GA

  42. Scientific “fact” This textbook contains material that states smoking can lead to cancer. That is a theory, not a fact, regarding the dangers of smoking. This material should be approached with an open mind, studied carefully, and critically considered. – my sticker for Cobb County

  43. Evolution & Natural Selection • Scientific “facts” and theories • mature and well-developed scientific theories systematically organize knowledge and allow us to explain and predict wide ranges of empirical events

  44. Science vs Ideology • Trofim Lysenko • Director of Soviet biology under Stalin • Rejected Mendelian genetics • Inheritability of acquired characteristics • Plucking a plant’s leaves can reduce leaves on offspring… • Genetics stigmatized • ‘bourgeois science’ or ‘fascist science’ • Stalin disliked fascist Germany’s embrace of genetics • Gregor Mendel himself was a priest • Religion considered backward and evil

  45. Science vs Ideology • Trofim Lysenko • Stalin insisted on applying Lysenkoismto human genetics • Geneticists were fired, sent to labor camps, or executed • ‘Scientific’ arguments were made based on conformity to Marxist ideology • Serious, long-term harm to Soviet biology • Massive crop failures, famine, millions of deaths • Economic disintegration • Crippled advances in biology and biochemistry

  46. Science vs Ideology • Soviet Sciences • While USSR invested heavily in science • Strictly persecuted deviations from communist ideology • Introduced party control over sciences • In general, ideologically-offensive disciplines and scientists were suppressed • Notable exception was nuclear physics • “Stalin was crazy, but he wasn’t stupid”

  47. Science vs Ideology • Where is science subordinated to ideology? • Nazi Germany • USSR • China • American schools

  48. What’s my point? • Science is profoundly important in our society • Only effective tool for understanding nature • Biology • Medicine • Physics • Fossil Fuel alternatives • Chemistry • Geology • Engineering • Informed decisions are impossible without some understanding of science

  49. What’s my point? • Science is a way of evaluating propositions • It provides mechanisms for distinguishing between true and false

  50. Science and Mathematics

More Related