1 / 25

KSU Cattle Value Optimization Seminar What Feedyards Are Looking For in Cattle They Buy

KSU Cattle Value Optimization Seminar What Feedyards Are Looking For in Cattle They Buy By Tom Brink. Five Rivers Ranch Cattle Feeding, LLC. Formerly 50-50 owned by ContiGroup & Smithfield Now owned entirely by JBS USA Thirteen feedyards in Eight States 890,000 head of feeding capacity

oona
Download Presentation

KSU Cattle Value Optimization Seminar What Feedyards Are Looking For in Cattle They Buy

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. KSU Cattle Value Optimization Seminar What Feedyards Are Looking For in Cattle They Buy By Tom Brink

  2. Five Rivers Ranch Cattle Feeding, LLC • Formerly 50-50 owned by ContiGroup & Smithfield • Now owned entirely by JBS USA • Thirteen feedyards in Eight States • 890,000 head of feeding capacity • Have sold cattle to 4 of the 5 major packers • Majority sold on grids (formulas)

  3. (1) Economics of Cattle Size and Finish Weight

  4. Economics of Size & Weight Is BIGGER better? Or is SMALLERbetter in a high feed cost environment?

  5. “The industry wants a steer that can produce a 700- to 800-lb. Choice carcass with a Yield Grade less than 3.” True statement?

  6. “The industry wants a steer that can produce a 700- to 800-lb. Choice carcass with a Yield Grade less than 3.” Choice YG 3 or less 700-800 lbs. ?

  7. Compare feeyard performance in steers that produce 700 to 800 pound carcasses with those with carcass weights of 850 pounds or more.

  8. Need cattle with the same placement weight and same health status and death loss. Also need to de-trend the performance data for out month.

  9. Steer Performance Comparison • 700-800 lb. carcasses • 784 lb. carcass wt. • 782 lb. placement wt. • 1.05% death loss • DMI = 19.29 lbs. • ADG = 2.93 lbs. • Dry F/G = 6.63 lbs. • 158 days on feed • >850 lb. carcasses • 866 lb. carcass wt. • 787 lb. placement wt. • 0.98% death loss • DMI = 20.34 lbs. • ADG = 3.30 lbs. • Dry F/G = 6.20 lbs. • 169 days on feed Multi-year closeouts on more than 470,000 head.

  10. Steer Performance Comparison • 700-800 lb. carcasses • 784 lb. carcass wt. • 782 lb. placement wt. • 1.05% death loss • DMI = 19.29 lbs. • ADG = 2.93 lbs. • Dry F/G = 6.63 lbs. • 158 days on feed • >850 lb. carcasses • 866 lb. carcass wt. • 787 lb. placement wt. • 0.98% death loss • DMI = 20.34 lbs. • ADG = 3.30 lbs. • Dry F/G = 6.20 lbs. • 169 days on feed

  11. Steer Performance Comparison • 700-800 lb. carcasses • 784 lb. carcass wt. • 782 lb. placement wt. • 1.05% death loss • DMI = 19.29 lbs. • ADG = 2.93 lbs. • Dry F/G = 6.63 lbs. • 158 days on feed • >850 lb. carcasses • 866 lb. carcass wt. • 787 lb. placement wt. • 0.98% death loss • DMI = 20.34 lbs. • ADG = 3.30 lbs. • Dry F/G = 6.20 lbs. • 169 days on feed

  12. Steer Performance Comparison • 700-800 lb. carcasses • 784 lb. carcass wt. • 782 lb. placement wt. • 1.05% death loss • DMI = 19.29 lbs. • ADG = 2.93 lbs. • Dry F/G = 6.63 lbs. • 158 days on feed • >850 lb. carcasses • 866 lb. carcass wt. • 787 lb. placement wt. • 0.98% death loss • DMI = 20.34 lbs. • ADG = 3.30 lbs. • Dry F/G = 6.20 lbs. • 169 days on feed

  13. Steer Performance Comparison • 700-800 lb. carcasses • 784 lb. carcass wt. • 782 lb. placement wt. • 1.05% death loss • DMI = 19.29 lbs. • ADG = 2.93 lbs. • Dry F/G = 6.63 lbs. • 158 days on feed • 1,225 lb. live weight • >850 lb. carcasses • 866 lb. carcass wt. • 787 lb. placement wt. • 0.98% death loss • DMI = 20.34 lbs. • ADG = 3.30 lbs. • Dry F/G = 6.20 lbs. • 169 days on feed • 1,353 lb. live weight

  14. $4.25 1,353 lbs. 1,225 lbs. The heavier-finishing steer creates more value in the feedyard… +$52.05 per head advantage

  15. “The industry wants a steer that can produce a 700- to 800-lb. Choice carcass with a Yield Grade less than 3.” Choice YG 3 or less 700-800 lbs.

  16. “The industry wants a steer that can produce a 700- to 800-lb. Choice carcass with a Yield Grade less than 3.” Choice YG 3 or less 700-800 lbs. 850 lbs. plus

  17. (2) Health in Feedyards

  18. Cattle health in the Feedyard • “Old problem” but still identified as the #1 production problem feedyards face • Impact on performance and carcass quality is well documented • We have the technology and know how to get cattle better prepared to leave the farm or ranch…implementation is lacking Many cattle still need stronger immunity when they leave home.

  19. Impact of Health & Death Loss* Death Loss ADG DMC Profit per head 0% - 0.5% 3.13 6.69 +$14.30 0.5% - 1.5% 2.99 6.89 +$2.25 1.5% + 2.86 7.03 -$19.49 *775 to 850-lb. yearling-fed steers sold January thru March 2010 2.4% difference between best and worst groups (0.48% vs. 2.88%).

  20. (3) Traits correlated with Grid Premiums

  21. South (KS-TX) Correlation Prime/Choice 0.60 Dress Percent 0.37 YG 4 & 5 0.00 YG 1 & 2 -0.24 Heavies -0.29 Darks -0.32 Standards -0.49 222,557 steers & heifers Traits correlated with grid premiums • North (CO-NE) Correlation • YG 1 & 2 0.39 • Prime/Choice 0.35 • Dress Percent 0.22 • Darks -0.08 • Standards -0.21 • YG 4 & 5 -0.46 • Heavies -0.46 • 113,858 steers & heifers

  22. First choice in feeders: AN x Continental • 50% to 75% Angus and 25% to 50% Continental • Good feeding, Good grading, Good yielding animal that is usually the right size • Higher percentage British cattle lack often muscle, yield and produce too many YG 4s. • Higher percentage Continental cattle lack quality grade, and often get too big before they finish. Balanced combination of Angus and Continental breeding is tough to beat.

  23. Creating more valuable feeder calves $$$$ • QSA-PVP (Age & Source) • Load-lot groups • Post-weaning management • Health protection • Right genetics within breeds • Right combination of breeds $$$ $$ $

  24. The End

More Related