1 / 31

Guiding Motif Discovery by Iterative Pattern Refinement

Guiding Motif Discovery by Iterative Pattern Refinement. Zhiping Wang, Mehmet Dalkilic, Sun Kim School of Informatics, Indiana University. Outline. Introduction and motivation Our framework for motif discovery Initial pattern discovery Build seed motif Extract subsequences

olive
Download Presentation

Guiding Motif Discovery by Iterative Pattern Refinement

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Guiding Motif Discovery by Iterative Pattern Refinement Zhiping Wang, Mehmet Dalkilic, Sun Kim School of Informatics, Indiana University

  2. Outline • Introduction and motivation • Our framework for motif discovery • Initial pattern discovery • Build seed motif • Extract subsequences • Motifs discovery • Iterative refinement • Experiment and Result • Discussion and Future work

  3. Introduction– motifs & their applications • Protein motifs are short patterns conserved in proteins. • They are generally important for the function of a protein or the maintenance of protein structures. • Enzyme catalytic sites • Regions involved in binding a molecule (ADP/ATP, DNA…) or another protein. • A fold important for general 3D structure. • Distinguish protein groups based on such patterns. • Classify a sequenced protein to a specific family of proteins.

  4. Introduction - motif discovery • PROSITE: find patterns manually • Deterministic algorithm, expectation maximization based: MEME (time consuming) • Stochastic algorithm (Gibbs sampling algorithm), random jumps in the search space: Gibbs Sampler; AlignACE • The performance varies with the input sequences’ characteristics. (For example, all known motifs in disease resistance genes in Arabidopsis thaliana were successfully found usingMEME after splitting the sequences into two distinct categories of resistance genes, but no motifs were found by inputting all disease resistance genes as a single input file to MEME.)

  5. Motivation • Motif discover is, in a sense, to compare two models: a model for the pattern (signal model) and a model for negative examples (noise model). • Input sequences determine the background noise model. The performance of motif discovery algorithms can be significantly improved by clustering input sequences into smaller groups. • Thus Motivation for our research is to use subsequences, instead of using whole sequences, for motif discovery. • However, it is quite difficult to select correct subsequence regions without prior knowledge, e.g., genes of the same type. We use an iterative algorithm to solve this problem.

  6. Motivation – an example PS00343 (L-P-x-T-G-[STGAVDE]) Figure 1, Motif logo for the multiple sequence alignment of a family Figure 2, Motif logo for conserved subsequences of the protein family.

  7. Outline • Introduction and motivation • Our framework for motif discovery • Initial pattern discovery • Build seed motif • Extract subsequences • Motifs discovery • Iterative refinement • Experiment and Result • Discussion and Future work

  8. Test Data Preparation 1. Download PROSITE pattern and sequence databases. 2. Parse all true positive sequences for each PROSITE ID and store them as a PROSITE family. 3. All sequences of one family contain the same PROSITE pattern. 4. We used PROSITE families to discovery motifs and test the performance of our framework.

  9. Framework Overview 1 • STEP1. Extract a set S of subsequences around a set of motifs M. • STEP2. Input S to a motif discovery algorithm, producing a new set of motifs M’. • STEP3. Search entire sequences for more occurrences of M’, producing M’. Set M’ to M and go to step 1.

  10. Framework Overview 2

  11. Outline • Introduction and motivation • Our framework for motif discovery • Initial pattern discovery • Build seed motif • Extract subsequences • Motifs discovery • Iterative refinement • Experiment and Result • Discussion and Future work

  12. Initial Pattern Discovery - thresholds • Three thresholds for pattern discovery: 1. length of patterns (L=3, exact patterns longer than 3 do not occur frequently even in the conserved motif regions). 2. log-odd value of 1st Markov model to random model (statistically significant patterns occur more frequently than random patterns ). 3. support value (patterns should be present in a certain number of sequences ).

  13. Initial Pattern Discovery - algorithm • Use thresholds to scan the sequences in one set of sequences, find out qualified patterns in each sequence. • Rank the sequences according to how many qualified patterns each sequence has. • Save the qualified patterns in the top half sequences and eliminate these sequences. • Repeat this algorithm on the rest half set of sequences (go to step 1) until no more patterns can be found. The saved patterns will be used later.

  14. Initial Pattern Discovery - example • Qualified Patterns (p1, p2, p3)

  15. Outline • Introduction and motivation • Our framework for motif discovery • Initial pattern discovery • Build seed motif • Extract subsequences • Motifs discovery • Iterative refinement • Experiment and Result • Discussion and Future work

  16. Build Seed Motif • Start from the pattern with maximal support, use it as the seed motif. • Calculate the scores of the candidate patterns (in sequences not covered by the seed motif) to the seed motif. Si = ΣSi-jWj (j = 1… n) Si: score of candidate pattern i to seed motif Si-j: score of candidate pattern to jth pattern in the seed motif Wj: the weight (support ratio) of jth pattern in the seed motif • Add the pattern which has the highest score (also larger than a score threshold) to the seed motif. • Go to step 2, until no more patterns can be added to the seed motif.

  17. Build Seed Motif - example • Calculate pattern scores (threshold = 5) P1 C L G 9 4 0 P2 C L N S2-1 = 9+4+0 = 13; S2 = S2-1W1 = 13

  18. Build Seed Motif - example • Calculate pattern scores (threshold = 5) S3-1= 10, S3-2 = 4 S3 = S3-1W1 + S3-2W2 = 8 > 5 S4-1 = 4, S4-2 = 10 S4 = S4-1W1 + S4-2W2 = 6 > 5

  19. Build Seed Motif - example • Calculate pattern scores (threshold = 5) S4-1 = 4, S4-2 = 10, S4-3 = 8 S4 = S4-1W1 + S4-2W2 + S4-3W3 = 9 > 5

  20. Build Seed Motif

  21. Outline • Introduction and motivation • Our framework for motif discovery • Initial pattern discovery • Build seed motif • Extract subsequences • Motifs discovery • Iterative refinement • Experiment and Result • Discussion and Future work

  22. Extract Subsequences

  23. Motifs Discovery MEME

  24. Iterative refinement sub-sequences MEME motif MAST entire protein family sub-sequences no Stable? yes motif discovery

  25. Iterative refinement

  26. Outline • Introduction and motivation • Our framework for motif discovery • Initial pattern discovery • Build seed motif • Extract subsequences • Motifs discovery • Iterative refinement • Experiment and Result • Discussion and Future work

  27. Experiment • We used 108 PROSITE families as test data. • Ran MEME directly on these families and got the best motif for each of them. • Ran our framework and got the best motif (Because of time constraints, our motif framework performed only single iteration. ) • Compared the results.

  28. Performance • The result of the comparison. http://biokdd.informatics.indiana.edu/zhipwang/paper/appendix

  29. Performance • The result of the comparison.

  30. Discussion • To make our experiment more rigorous, we choose only the top motif reported by both MEME and our framework. • Among the 22 failed cases, our framework did discover 21 of them, though their rank was not top. • One flaw: Local optima • This framework is general enough to include any motif discovery and search algorithms that report multiple motifs with a statistical score.

  31. Future Work • On the theoretical side, we are interested in formalizing and understanding the role of noise. • How likely subsequences induced by our initial pattern discovery algorithm can include true motifs? • Is convergence to true motif regions guaranteed once the initial set of subsequences contain true motifs? • For empirical study, we plan to perform multiple iterations using the whole PROSITE pattern set; embed different motif discovery and search programs into our framework.

More Related