1 / 5

Authors: Scott Poretsky, Quarry Technologies Brent Imhoff, LightCore

IGP Data Plane Convergence Benchmarking draft -ietf-bmwg-igp-dataplane-conv-app-05.txt draft-ietf-bmwg-igp-dataplane-conv-term-05.txt draft -ietf-bmwg-igp-dataplane-conv-meth-05.txt. Authors: Scott Poretsky, Quarry Technologies Brent Imhoff, LightCore. 62nd IETF Meeting – Minneapolis.

oke
Download Presentation

Authors: Scott Poretsky, Quarry Technologies Brent Imhoff, LightCore

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. IGP Data Plane Convergence Benchmarking draft-ietf-bmwg-igp-dataplane-conv-app-05.txtdraft-ietf-bmwg-igp-dataplane-conv-term-05.txt draft -ietf-bmwg-igp-dataplane-conv-meth-05.txt Authors: Scott Poretsky, Quarry Technologies Brent Imhoff, LightCore 62nd IETF Meeting – Minneapolis

  2. Version History • 3 documents for work item = methodology, terminology, and considerations • Had a WG Last Call for –03 revisions of all 3 docs prior to IETF 60 BMWG meeting where additional comments received. • -04 revisions posted to incorporate comments made during IETF 60. • Additional comments to –04 were received at IETF 61 BMWG meeting and electronically. These necessitated a –05. • -05 posted for all 3 docs to incorporate (final?) comments prior to IETF 62.

  3. Summary of Terminology -05 Changes • Updated to preferred Existing Definitions Statement • Changed equation 3 and added comment in Discussion for Sustained Convergence Time “(eq 3) Sustained Forwarding Convergence Time = 5 x (# routes in FIB) / (Offered Load) for which at least one packet per destination MUST be received at the DUT.” • Added note that the “Next-Best Egress Interface” must be the same link speed and media type as the “Preferred Egress Interface”. • Added definition for “Nested Convergence Events” “The occurrence of Convergence Event while the route table is converging from a prior Convergence Event.”

  4. Summary of Methodology -05 Changes • Updated to preferred Existing Definitions Statement • Added note in Introduction that Methodologies apply to IPv4 and IPv6 traffic and IGPs. • Paragraph 3.2.7 Interface Types was written so that any interface type can be used (previously recommended SONET) • Added note to paragraph 3.2.5 Convergence Time Metrics that “The Packet Sampling Interval value is the smallest measurable convergence time.”

  5. Next Steps • Any other comments? • Ready for another WG Last Call? • Ready for IESG Review?

More Related