Loading in 2 Seconds...
Loading in 2 Seconds...
Management, Inappropriate Management or Psychological Harassment: Where do we draw the line?. Professor Angelo Soares Department of Organization and Human Resources UQÀM. Decent Society. "A decent society is one whose institutions do not humiliate people" Avishai Margalit. Decent Work.
Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.
Professor Angelo Soares
Department of Organization and Human Resources
"A decent society is one whose institutions do not humiliate people"
Decent work is work where there is an effort to prevent situations where workers feel humiliated.
Work is decent when management and organizations ensure that their workers have no reason to feel humiliated.
Humiliation is often a factor in psychological harassment in the workplace.
"Harassment is behavior that involves repeated and persistent attempts by one person to torment, wear down, frustrate, or get a reaction from another. It is behavior that persistently provokes, pressures, frightens, intimidates, or otherwise discomforts another person."
For the purposes of this Act, "psychological harassment" means any vexatious behaviour in the form of repeated and hostile or unwanted conduct, verbal comments, actions or gestures, that affects an employee’s dignity or psychological or physical integrity and that results in a harmful work environment for the employee.
A single serious incidence of such behaviour that has a lasting harmful effect on an employee may also constitute psychological harassment.
All employees have the right to a work environment free from psychological harassment.
Employers must take all reasonable action to prevent psychological harassment and, whenever they become aware of such behaviour, to put a stop to it.
An employee who believes he has been the victim of psychological harassment may file a complaint in writing with the Commission des normes du travail.
If the Commission des relations du travail considers that the employee has been the victim of psychological harassment and that the employer has failed to fulfil its obligations, it may render any decision it believes fair and reasonable, taking into account all the circumstances of the matter, including:
(1) ordering the employer to reinstate the employee;
(2) ordering the employer to pay the employee an indemnity up to a maximum equivalent to wages lost;
(3) ordering the employer to take reasonable action to put a stop to the harassment;
(4) ordering the employer to pay punitive and moral damages to the employee;
(5) ordering the employer to pay the employee an indemnity for loss of employment;
(6) ordering the employer to pay for the psychological support needed by the employee for a reasonable period of time determined by the Commission;
(7) ordering the modification of the disciplinary record of the employee.
- 1,030 files being processed (65%)
- 550 files closed (35%)
12 unfounded complaints (2%)
110 agreements (20%)
2 investigation reports sent to the Commission des relations du travail
The persistent nature of the action;
The repetitive nature of the action;
The effects are always negative, devastating and destructive for the targeted persons;
The definition emphasizes the impact on the target person and not the intentions of the person who harasses.
The definition of psychological harassment is not clear.
(Stale Einarsen, Helge Hoel, Dieter Zapf and Cary L. Cooper, 2003)
Moral harassment = psychological harassment
It's not psychological harassment, it's managers exercising their rights.
It's not psychological harassment, it's leaders being tough.
The manager has the prerogative to decide how to manage.
The manager's rights can be explicitly set out in the collective agreement.
Economic aspects: financing, investment, prices, nature of products, etc.
Production: organizing production, determining manufacturing processes, making decisions pertaining to organizational change, sub-contracting, etc.
Human resources management: staffing, staff assignments, discipline, promotions, demotions, dismissals, etc.
Source: Dion, Gérard
Knowledge of the business: finance, marketing, strategy, technology, production, etc.
Knowledge of human resources practices: staffing, communication, performance appraisal, rewards, organizational development, etc.
Knowledge of change management: identifying change-related problems, crafting a leadership style, building trust among the various organizational stakeholders, etc.
Source: Dave Ulrich
In situations of psychological harassment, the problem most often relates to:
- HRM practices
- change management
Thus, the psychological harassment is caused by improper human resources management.
It must be noted that in such cases, no judgment is made as to whether there was an intention to harass someone.
Performance appraisal (feedback)
My representative told him: "We are ready to go to your office." His office is just on the other side. Then, he turned around and said: "No." He said: "I'm going to do this in front of everyone," and then he began yelling all sorts of things in a nasty tone. Three times the union representative told him: "Let's go into your office, it's not appropriate to do this in front of everyone." I just stood there. Another woman, who has worked in the office for years, got up and said: "Mr. X, this is not the place for such behaviour, have some dignity." He paid her no attention. Then, the representative told me: "Let's go back upstairs." We went upstairs but I was shocked, and humiliated too. (Ms. A).
Establish a climate of trust
Give feedback when it is most appropriate for the recipient, and do so one on one
Offer praise along with criticism
Show consideration and respect
Refrain from passing judgment
- do not judge
- do not ascribe intention
- be specific and descriptive
Be clear and specifi
"When + I + Why
n + the specific behaviour
I + the feelings experienced, by the person providing the feedback, at the time of the behaviour
Why + the consequences of the behaviour
"When you arrived late this morning, I was upset because I was counting on your expertise to clarify the budget issue, which was the most important item on the agenda."
"At the end of a week, he came directly to the department. It took a week and he came to tell me I was incompetent. I said, listen, could we meet to discuss what's wrong? And he said 'no, I don't need you to come to my office, I can say in front of everyone that you aren't doing a good job.' He was cursing too. He yelled at me in front of all my co‑workers." (Ms. B)
Written disciplinary notice
Short-term suspension without pay
Long-term suspension without pay
Disciplinary action is taken when an employee knowingly violates the rules.
Prepare a file.
Louis, 44 years of age, has worked for the company for 23 years and is responsible for maintaining the production equipment. He has been the victim of psychological harassment. He has been falsely accused of making mistakes. He has been denied promotions for no justifiable reason. His salary has been decreased. His employer is putting together a file to dismiss him. It is really about his seniority, because he is starting to cost the company a lot of money ($18.31 an hour).
Laura, 45 years of age, has been a waitress in a restaurant for six years. "It has been going on for six months and I've already lost 5 kg." She is the target of verbal harassment and veiled threats. She can't quit and the employer can't dismiss her because he has no grounds, so he is doing all he can to make her leave.
The psychological harassment endured by an employee and the employer's expectations concerning that employee's performance are two separate elements and they should not be confused, especially when dismissal is involved.
The complainant challenged his dismissal, which occurred one year after he was hired as a tax recovery officer with the Department of Revenue. He alleged that he had been dismissed solely because his immediate supervisor, the section chief, did not like him. He also alleged that he had been the target of psychological harassment since the first day of his employment.
The arbitrator found that his poor performance had led to his dismissal, although he acknowledged that the employee's supervisor did carry out psychological harassment. Therefore, the arbitrator allowed the employee's grievance in part:
- he ordered the employer to pay the employee an indemnity for the harassment he endured
- he rejected the employee's request for reinstatement
Leadership: a type of interpersonal influence through which one individual leads another individual or group to properly carry out a task.
A number of theories:
- Leadership based on consideration for others
- Leadership based on task structuring
- Situational leadership
However, leadership can be poor or non-existent
- Laissez-faire: Leader shirks responsibilities and avoids making decisions. Group members are left to their own devices. Results are all negative.
- Results: Poor performance, wasted time, inefficiency, dissatisfaction, group ineffectiveness, aggressive behaviour, divisions within the group.
Incompetent leadership: Leader lacks the will and/or ability to maintain effective action. With respect to at least one important leadership challenge, does not manage to produce positive change.
Rigid leadership: Leader is rigid and inflexible. Although may be competent, is incapable of or unwilling to adapt to new ideas, new information or changing times.
Overbearing leadership: Leader lacks self control and is encouraged and backed up by supporters who refuse or are unable to intervene effectively.
Insensitive leadership: Leader is insensitive and disagreeable. Needs, complaints and wishes of most members of the group or organization, particularly subordinates, are ignored or overlooked.
Corrupt leadership: Leader lies, cheats or steals. To an abnormal extent, puts own interests ahead of the public interest.
Narrow-minded leadership: Leader minimizes or does not take into account health and well-being of “others,” i.e. those outside the group or organization for which the leader is directly responsible.
Malicious leadership: Leader commits atrocities. Uses suffering as an instrument of power. Harm done to men, women and children is quite serious. Harm may be physical, psychological or both.
Helen has been working as a server for a year and a half. She is being harassed by a co‑worker because she was given the shift where servers make the best money. This co‑worker has struck her, issued death threats and subjected her to verbal abuse. The labour standards board told her to call the police but she is reluctant to react, since she doesn’t want to lose her job. She has talked to the owner about it, but the owner doesn’t want to get involved in conflicts between her employees.
Conflict: A process that begins when one individual sees that another individual has had an adverse effect on or is about to have an adverse effect on something the first individual considers important.
The goal is conflict resolution—eliminating the underlying causes of the conflict
Unresolved conflicts pave the way for other conflicts
Substantive conflict: Related to differences in views and opinions
- concerns goals to be pursued or means of achieving them
- usually functional conflict
Emotional conflict: Related more to a person than to a problem. Manifests through feelings of anger, mistrust, animosity, fear and bitterness
- dysfunctional conflict
Indirect management: Does not attack problems face on or try to resolve them by bringing together the people involved
Direct management: Tries to resolve the conflict. It takes time and energy to find a solution
Decrease in interdependence:
- involves eliminating or restricting contact between the parties in conflict
Appeal to shared objectives:
- refocuses the parties’ attention on the objectives to be achieved
Recourse to higher authorities
Problems are sent up the line for superiors to solve.
ATTENTION! Managers may be inclined to reduce conflicts to personalities.
- Too much stress
- Incompetence in managing conflicts
- Fundamental bias in assigning responsibility
9 - Total destruction and suicide
8 - Fragmentation of the enemy
7 - Campaigns of destruction
6 – Threat strategies
5 - Loss of face, moral excesses
4 - Reputations, images and coalitions
3 – Documents, not discussions
2 - Polarization: debates and polemics
1 - Attempts at cooperation, tensions and crystallization
It’s not harassment, it’s a personality conflict.
People who are harassed have done something to deserve it.
It takes two to play that game.
People who have not experienced harassment think the victim must have done something to cause the psychological harassment; the victim must have behaved in such a way as to make the perpetrator act in this awful manner.
People who have not experienced psychological harassment can continue to consider themselves safe or invulnerable if they can convince themselves that they are protected by being the kind of people they are.
By blaming the victims, people not only maintain their own illusion of invulnerability and safety but also minimize their feeling of responsibility for supporting the victims.
Victims are stigmatized because they are going to break through the defence mechanisms that people have been erected to protect themselves from suffering.
People who have experienced harassment are powerful reminders of what can happen to anyone.
Harassment only happens to people who are weak.
Harassment happens to people who are atypical.
People who complain of harassment are too sensitive.
Thus far, no specific personality traits have ever been associated with people who have experienced psychological harassment.
The causes lie in the social context and the power structures of organizations (Leymann, 1993; Vartia, 1996; Salin, 2003; Soares, 2002 and 2004)
Women are usually the victims of psychological harassment.
Women are more often the perpetrators of harassment, because they are more psychologically twisted, more spiteful
Men are more hesitant to file a complaint, since it doesn’t fit with the macho image.
Women seek psychological help more often than men do.
In a traditionally female environment, attacks focused on people’s private lives are more often directed against men.
In a traditionally male environment, attacks focused on people’s private lives are more often directed against women
The hostile strategies used against women are associated with verbal violence. The aim is to prevent the victim from expressing herself.
The hostile strategies used against men are designed more to discredit them in their work.
Men are more often told that they are mentally ill. Here, the intention is to discredit the victim in the workplace.
Study 1 – Traditionally Female Environment
Male and Female
Study 2 – Traditionally Male Environment
Male and Female
People who say they are being harassed don’t want to work.
You can’t develop post-traumatic stress as a result of harassment.
Post-traumatic stress disorder is a state of intense fear, terror and powerlessness caused by an unusual event that poses a real threat to a person’s life or physical integrity. Its main symptoms are:
Memory problems, nightmares, difficulty concentrating, apathy, irritability, feelings of insecurity, difficulty falling asleep, early awakening, etc.
A change in personality can occur when post-traumatic stress reaches a chronic phase.
If you are being harassed, it is because you are not capable of confronting your harasser.
I confronted the person(s) harassing me (51.5%)
I ignored the person(s) harassing me (33.1%)
I reported the harassment to a union representative (27.8%)
I ignored the harassment (24.3%)
I asked for the harassment to stop (17.2%)
I reported the harassment to Human Resources (9.5%)
I asked for a job transfer (7.1%)
I couldn’t do anything (6.5%)
I filed a grievance (5.9%)
I threatened to tell everyone about the harassment (1.8%)
I ignored the person(s) harassing me (34.1%)
I confronted the person(s) harassing me (32.9%)
I ignored the harassment (26.3%)
I reported the harassment to a union representative (21.0%)
I couldn’t do anything (12.6%)
I asked for a job transfer (12.0%)
I asked for the harassment to stop (11.4%)
I filed a grievance (5.4%)
I reported the harassment to Human Resources (5.4%)
If I tell someone, no one will believe me.
We will never be able to prove that it’s psychological harassment.
You should not pursue it further because it will just prolong your suffering. It is better to leave and let it go.
Change in work organization
Change in management model
Take note of all actions
- Dates, schedules, nature of remarks, criticisms, accusations, emotions and feelings
- Answers given.
Confrontation is not a good solution.
Try to stay calm and always be polite.
Keep copies of your annual appraisals, letters and memos about your ability to perform the work.
Be aware of the problem
-Many people think that psychological harassment is inevitable, that it is just part of the workplace, that it happens only to “weak” people.
Training materials, posters, brochures, etc. If your organization has a newsletter or news bulletin, you can include an article about psychological harassment.
In addition to providing psychological support, it is crucial to show solidarity with the victim of PH and the witnesses.
This show of solidarity will bring the group together and provide the support required to deal with the consequences of PH.
This solidarity will also show that it is not just one person but the whole organization that has been affected and that must react.
The importance of the return-to-work program.
The Balashev syndrome describes resistance by an organizational structure and/or organizational culture to the implementation of certain organizational policies.
Because of this syndrome, the existence of an organizational policy against psychological harassment is not in itself sufficient to prevent psychological harassment.
Many organizational policies exist in theory only, in a binder on a shelf. People are not very familiar with them or applying them is very complex, costly and disheartening. Therefore, in reality, there is no organizational policy capable of protecting the organization.
Make sure people are familiar with your policy on psychological harassment in the workplace.
Make sure it is a dynamic policy.
Stress the positive and preventive aspects of your policy.