flow control impact on members residents and businesses of the region l.
Download
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Flow Control Impact on Members, Residents and Businesses of the Region PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Flow Control Impact on Members, Residents and Businesses of the Region

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 15

Flow Control Impact on Members, Residents and Businesses of the Region - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 612 Views
  • Uploaded on

Flow Control Impact on Members, Residents and Businesses of the Region Isle of Wight Board of Supervisors Meeting August 16, 2007 John S. Hadfield, P.E., B.C.E.E. Executive Director, SPSA Flow Control Defined

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

Flow Control Impact on Members, Residents and Businesses of the Region


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
flow control impact on members residents and businesses of the region

Flow ControlImpact on Members, Residents and Businesses of the Region

Isle of Wight Board of Supervisors Meeting

August 16, 2007

John S. Hadfield, P.E., B.C.E.E.

Executive Director, SPSA

flow control defined
Flow Control Defined
  • Flow control refers to the legal right of localities to control where waste generated within their jurisdictions is taken for disposal
legal context authorizations
Legal Context & Authorizations
  • Federal
    • April 30, 2007 U.S. Supreme Court United Haulers decision
  • Virginia & Local
    • Authorized by Virginia Code
key groups affected
Key Groups Affected
  • SPSA Member Communities
    • Chesapeake, Franklin, Norfolk, Portsmouth, Suffolk and Virginia Beach and the Counties of Southampton and Isle of Wight
  • Residents
    • Homeowners, condominium owners, and renters
  • Businesses that use the private sector for waste disposal
    • Owners, tenants, and property managers
  • Businesses that use the public sector for waste disposal
  • Private Haulers
  • Environmental Community
impact on spsa member communities
Pros

Fairness in rates

Cost of disposal is the same whether the waste is generated by a homeowner, condominium owner, apartment renter, or business owner

Eliminates the current financial need to contract for out-of-state solid waste (excluding proprietary waste documents and products)----a policy opposed by a significant number of citizens

Reduces costs for member localities (from $100/ton to the mid-$50s per ton)

Restores original SPSA business model

Cons

Administrative and enforcement responsibilities

Potential litigation (costs covered by SPSA)

Increase in costs of disposal for waste collected from public facilities under contract with private haulers (i.e. – schools and municipal buildings)

Impact on SPSA Member Communities
impact on spsa member communities cont
Pros

May reduce need to raise the real estate tax

Provides members with more disposal options post 2018

Ensures stable revenue and waste stream for SPSA, providing system predictability and adequate fuel supplies to Waste-to-Energy

Ensures that SPSA continues to provide an array of environmental and reuse services

Cons

Impact on SPSA Member Communities (cont.)
estimated member community financial impact
Estimated Member Community Financial Impact

Notes: 1These figures are estimates only; they are based on a combination of previous tonnages and a $52/ton tipping fee •2The total estimated savings are in constant dollars, through January 2018 •3If SPSA ceases using the Regional Landfill, Suffolk will pay the prevailing municipal tipping fee • 4Savings for Virginia Beach are compared to the City’s capped rate of $53.88 in FY2009; the cap expires July 2015.

impact on residents
Pros

Fairness in rates

Cost of disposal is the same whether the waste is generated by a homeowner, condominium owner, apartment renter, or business owner

Cons

Equalizing rates may cause some increases to residents who live in apartments and condominiums served by private waste disposal companies

Impact on Residents
impact on residents9
Pros

Eliminates the current financial need to contract for out-of-state solid waste---a policy opposed by a significant number of citizens

May reduce need to raise the real estate tax

Cons

Impact on Residents
impact on area businesses
Pros

May bring about additional competition for waste collection

Will reduce charges in some communities for small businesses that receive solid waste services from their local governments

Cons

Will cause some increases to businesses who contract out waste disposal to the private sector

Impact on Area Businesses
impact on area businesses cont
Pros

May reduce need to raise the real estate tax

Cons

Impact on Area Businesses (cont.)
impact on private haulers
Pros

Ensures same rates for all haulers

No discernible impact on hauling operations

Cons

May receive complaints from customers for price increases

Eliminates option of disposing of out-of-state waste at SPSA facilities

Haulers who own landfills will no longer be able to dispose of the region’s solid waste at their facilities

Impact on Private Haulers*

*Note: Construction demolition debris and recyclables are not covered under flow control.

environmental community
Environmental Community
  • A broad section of the local environmental community has opposed SPSA’s acceptance of out-of-state solid waste. The financial need to accept this waste would be eliminated through the adoption of flow control.
other issues
Other Issues
  • Ensures that all disposal occurs with a public agency that is sensitive to public health and safety concerns, with governance and decision processes that are open to public scrutiny