1 / 17

An Evaluation of the R3 Reading Program at Success Elementary School

This study evaluates the effectiveness of the R3 Reading Program at Success Elementary School in improving reading skills of children. It explores the background, purpose, research questions, study design, strengths, weaknesses, data collection, credibility, and dependability. Findings, program familiarity, coach support, and recommendations are also discussed.

nita
Download Presentation

An Evaluation of the R3 Reading Program at Success Elementary School

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. An Evaluation of the R3 Reading Program at Success Elementary School April 10, 2013

  2. Why Evaluate R3? • Children who lack necessary reading skills are at risk of underperforming in other subjects areas and places them at greater risk for failure in school (Lyon, 2009).

  3. Background

  4. Purpose of Study

  5. Research Questions

  6. Study Design

  7. Strengths & Weaknesses

  8. Data Collection

  9. Strengths & Weaknesses

  10. Credibility & Dependability

  11. Findings

  12. R3 Program Familiarity 3 Very Familiar Relatively Familiar Somewhat Familiar 0.88 Not Familiar 0

  13. R3 Coach

  14. Grades K-2

  15. Teacher Rating of R3 Coach Support 4 4 4 Outstandingly effective Highly effective Satisfactory 1.3 Minimally effective 0.7 0.5 0 0 Ineffective 0 Forming Learning Communities Support Teacher Change Student Monitoring

  16. Recommendations

  17. Communicate Results

More Related