360 likes | 478 Views
In June 2011, Ben Levin from the OISE - University of Toronto presented insights into the significant changes made in the Ontario education system from 2003 to 2009. Addressing challenges like public dissatisfaction and stagnant results, the focus shifted to ambitious public goals, strong leadership, and building sector capacity. Key improvements included rising literacy and numeracy standards, increased high school graduation rates, and reduced teacher attrition. This presentation emphasizes the importance of systemic change, stakeholder communication, and political alignment in driving educational success.
E N D
System Improvement PARCC Washington DC June, 2011 Ben Levin, OISE- University of Toronto
Daunting Task • Big undertaking • It’s reasonable to feel apprehensive • Ontario – Fall 2004 • Key is sustained, thoughtful effort
Ontario Education System • 13 M people • 415,000 sq ms – much larger than Texas • 2 M students in 4900 schools, many are small • 72 districts in 4 different public systems (Catholic, French) widely varied in size • 100% provincial funding; $10,400/student/year • Qualified, skilled teachers • Unionized teachers and support staff
Ontario 2003–2009 • From high conflict, stagnant results, public dissatisfaction, and poor morale • To improving student results, low conflict, improved educator morale, and increased public satisfaction
Examples • Literacy/numeracy at standard (a high standard) up from 54% to 69% • 95% of students at ‘competence’ • High school graduation up from 68% to 81% • Low performing schools down by +75% • Teacher attrition down sharply
How to Do This • The right changes • No simple solutions • The right implementation • ‘Deliverology’ • A positive approach • Managing the politics and distractions • As important as the technical side • Persistence
Context Matters • Political culture • Level of autonomy • Public views of acceptable policy • Political supports (or opposition) • System capacity • Leader expertise • Teacher expertise
Main Elements – 1 • Public goals and targets • Simple, clear, with high consensus
Ontario example - goals • Better outcomes • 75% at standard in literacy and numeracy, age 12 • 85% high school graduation rate • Reduced gaps in outcomes • Ethnicity, SES, gender, disability… • Increased public confidence
Main Elements – 1 • Public goals and targets • Clear strategy, strong leadership • At all levels • Beyond projects to system change • Sector support • Positive two-way communication • Adjustment as you proceed • Policy is supportive rather than central • Curriculum, assessment, etc.
Main Elements – 2 • Sector capacity • Helping people do better • Support well-grounded practices • Build on what already works • Minimize “mandates” but work towards standard practice • Stay focused over years • Adjust as needed • Coherence and alignment
The Right Changes • Change teaching and learning practices in all schools • Best evidence • Student engagement • Reach out to parents and community • Build sector capacity and commitment • Improve leadership skills • Approach curriculum and assessment as servants, not masters
Where to Focus • Think ‘system’ more than ‘school’ • All schools need to improve • Specific attention to: • Low-performing schools • “Coasting” schools • Priority groups • Minorities, ESL, special education, disability
Implementation/ Delivery • Focus on system and whole school changes • Avoid “projects” • Create infrastructure to deliver • Relevant to the size of the challenge • Support people as well as resources • Ontario examples – LNS, L18 • Be relentless about reminders, events, and supports • Build research, evaluation, and data
Capacity to Deliver • Fullan’s ‘tri-level solution’ • State departments/ministries need lots of change • Never designed to support improvement • Alignment of policy and approach across units • This is very hard to do • Same at district level
Stronger State Departments • Checklist of 26 characteristics • Under main headings of goals, senior management, structure, culture, resources, plans, stakeholders, staffing, research • Ontario example – realigning (NOT reorganizing) the Ministry • Goal achievement, not compliance
Improving Practices • Use what we know • Avoid ‘mandating’ in favor of learning • Ontario example – Lighthouse schools • Start with easier steps • Work collectively • In teams more than as individuals • Ontario example – Leading Student Achievement • Root practices in school settings • Use data effectively
Importance of Systems • Make the priorities, the priorities! • Regular events to review data and progress Ontario example – major events • Processes to ensure every student is considered Ontario example – student progress indicators • Prevention rather than remediation
Working with Districts • Creating networks and shared learning • Building leadership at district as well as school level • Elected boards as well as managers • Ontario example – legislation • Ontario example – back office • Lots of communication – but aligned • Simplifying reporting
Elementary and Secondary • Different strategies • Elementary more focus on teaching/learning • Secondary more focus on knowing students and tracking progress • Also different delivery strategies • More program issues in secondary • Influence of PSE and subject areas
Building Sector Support • Strong political leadership • “Guiding coalition” • Align with local leaders • Respect all partners • Ontario example – Partnership Table • Appeal to educators’ ideals • Stay focused and aligned • Develop public confidence and support
Public Confidence • Talking positively about schools • But also open about challenges • Working with media and intermediaries on understanding • Must be simple, clear messages backed by action
Communication and Support • Endless communication to sector • Enlisting support from leaders and teachers • Constant positive reinforcement • Respectful but with expectations • Regular public communication • Successes and challenges • Learn and adapt as you go • Feedback, critical friends • Labor peace a key element
Recap • It takes ongoing effort, on a consistent agenda, with strong support, sufficient infrastructure, and a positive message.
For States • Do you have the capacity to deliver at scale? • Do you have the systems and processes to make this your priority? • Do you have the alignment across your whole organization? • Can you manage the politics?