what is the optimal strategy for a high statistics k g pnn measurement at fermilab n.
Download
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
What is the Optimal Strategy for a High Statistics K + g pnn Measurement at Fermilab? PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
What is the Optimal Strategy for a High Statistics K + g pnn Measurement at Fermilab?

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 13

What is the Optimal Strategy for a High Statistics K + g pnn Measurement at Fermilab? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 79 Views
  • Uploaded on

What is the Optimal Strategy for a High Statistics K + g pnn Measurement at Fermilab?. R. Tschirhart, August 21 st , 2009. What has been Proposed, Accepted, Un-accepted and Studied at Fermilab.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'What is the Optimal Strategy for a High Statistics K + g pnn Measurement at Fermilab?' - nenet


Download Now An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
what is the optimal strategy for a high statistics k g pnn measurement at fermilab

What is the Optimal Strategy for a High Statistics K+gpnn Measurement at Fermilab?

R. Tschirhart,

August 21st , 2009

what has been proposed accepted un accepted and studied at fermilab
What has been Proposed, Accepted, Un-accepted and Studied at Fermilab
  • Conceptual designs has been developed for a 100-event decay-in-flight charged kaon experiment driven with 120 GeV beam. Designs based on separated beams (CKM) and un-separated beams (KPlus) have been explored:

http://www.fnal.gov/projects/ckm/Welcome.html

These can be realized with 120 GeV stretcher operation* of the Tevatron with minimal impact on the coincident Long-Baseline Neutrino Experimental program. CERN is pursing an in-flight technique using the SPS.

  • Concepts have been developed for 1000-event stopped K+ and low-energy KL experiments driven by high duty factor 8 GeV proton beam.

See: http://project-x-kaons.fnal.gov/

*Syphers, AD-DocDB 2222, 2849

August 21st 2009. R. Tschirhart - Fermilab

summary of 8 gev studies
Summary of 8 GeV Studies:
  • Winter/Spring 2008:

Project-X era with 200 kW of 8 GeV beam. Concepts for 1000 event K+ and KL experiments were developed based of stopping K+ techniques and a KOPIO TOF techniques with a pencil beam.

  • Summer 2008:

Developed a concept for a 40-event/year K+ experiment driven with 30 kW of 8 GeV beam before the Project-X era using the Debuncher/Accumulator complex. Discussed with the Fermilab PAC, which encouraged consideration of experiments beyond the reach of the CERN NA62 experiment.

August 21st 2009. R. Tschirhart - Fermilab

bnl e787 e949 stopping k experiment that established the k pnn decay process
BNL E787/E949: Stopping K+ Experiment that established the K+->pnn decay process

August 21st 2009. R. Tschirhart - Fermilab

ckm detector
CKM Detector

August 21st 2009. R. Tschirhart - Fermilab

kplus detector
KPLUS Detector

August 21st 2009. R. Tschirhart - Fermilab

the tevatron stretcher concept
The Tevatron Stretcher Concept
  • Can be readily realized after Run-II.
  • Good use of a SC machine:
  • 1) Match Tevatron energy to Main Injector energy. No ramping.
  • 2) Clean single pulse transfer from MI to the Tevatron at 120 GeV.
  • 3) Slow spill beam out of the Tevatron with very high duty factor.
  • Impact on NuMI operations is similar (~10%) to the current test-beam and E906 impact.
  • SEB extraction of beam is easier than at 8 GeV. Beam-charge/Beam-power is x15 better. Proposed SEB performance is comparable to 1997 TeV FT.
  • Keeping Tevatron “on ice” about ~$6M/year. Tevatron Stretcher power and cryo is $8M/year + staff, estimated total of about $15M/year.

August 21st 2009. R. Tschirhart - Fermilab

how might the ckm design scale with running time duty factor and additional acceptance
How might the CKM design scale with running time, duty factor and additional acceptance?
  • CKM assumed 4680 hours/year of accelerator operations.
  • CKM assumed 5x1012 protons/3-seconds with a 33% duty factor.
  • CKM sensitivity based on just PNN1 acceptance.
  • CKM 100 event sensitivity is based on a 1x10-10 BR.

CKM at the Tevatron Stretcher:

5000 hours/4680 hours = x1.1

(100x1012 protons/26-seconds)/(5x1012 protons/3-seconds)* = x2.2

(5 years of running)/(2 years of running) = x2.5

(PNN2 Acceptance = PNN1 Acceptance) = x2.0

Correction for SM Branching Ratio = x0.8

----------

*(Instantaneous rates 80% of CKM design) x9.7

August 21st 2009. R. Tschirhart - Fermilab

issues with advancing a ckm design
Issues with Advancing a CKM Design
  • At the time of CKM’s cancellation the Total Project Cost (TPC) was estimated to be $100M in FY2001 dollars by an independent review (Temple review). This escalates to about $140M then-year (2015) dollars.
  • We know more now at Fermilab about the cost of SCRF and the associated infrastructure (cryo-modules, etc) The cost of the SCRF beamline was probably underestimated in 2001.
  • In all likelyhood the cost of CKM in then-year TPC dollars would exceed $150M. Cost drivers are: SCRF, Buildings, Instrumented long decay volume.
  • Fermilab is now advancing Nova ($270M TPC, 2010 construction start), and is pushing Mu2e hard ($200M TPC, 2013 construction start).
  • Project-X accelerator construction is being ambitiously pursued after this.
  • A $150M TPC project must get in line behind these planned projects.

August 21st 2009. R. Tschirhart - Fermilab

further issues with advancing another in flight experiment
Further Issues with Advancing Another In-flight Experiment.
  • The Fermilab KPlus/P940 proposal design is quite similar to the CERN NA62 design. Advancing a similar experiment does not offer much insurance to the field and arguably is not the best use of resources now that NA62 is rolling.
  • The CKM design arguably has greater sensitivity and better scaling performance with beam power. Nevertheless it will be hard sell to get started as a $150M TPC before the CERN NA62 experiment runs and demonstrates the viability of the in-flight technique.

August 21st 2009. R. Tschirhart - Fermilab

1000 event sensitivity is not necessarily a 3 measurement
1000-event Sensitivity is not Necessarily a 3% Measurement
  • A 1000 event measurement requires control of systematics and backgrounds at the 1% level. Where are we at here??
  • Backgrounds: e.g., What are the limits of the bifurcation technique employed by E949?
  • Systematics: e.g. Can acceptance and losses be understood to this level?

We need to address this in any proposal that discusses a 1000-event measurement.

August 21st 2009. R. Tschirhart - Fermilab

tactical advantages of mounting a high sensitivity stopped experiment at fermilab
Tactical Advantages of Mounting a High Sensitivity Stopped Experiment at Fermilab
  • Technique established, sensitivity scaling is fairly robust.
  • Different technique than NA62.
  • Detector and beamline is relatively small, which means:
  • Existing primary beam-lines and experiment enclosures can be considered.
  • Existing detector solenoids (CDF/D0) can be re-purposed at relatively low cost.
  • Detector volume is small, which controls costs.
  • A then-year TPC of less than $50M is plausible, which is a conceivable schedule match to the Tevatron running as a collider through FY-2011, followed by a 1-year reconfiguration of the complex and then commissioning in 2013.

August 21st 2009. R. Tschirhart - Fermilab

issues
Issues
  • Sensitivity, Backgrounds, Systematics.
  • Cost, cost, cost.
  • Who “pays” for operation of the Tevatron?
  • Can a small project jump in line ahead of large projects?

August 21st 2009. R. Tschirhart - Fermilab