Over 100 hundred submissions received 52 proposals (some multiple options) 3 gaps identified

1. Phase 1 Long Term Options in numbers • Over 100 hundred submissions received • 52 proposals (some multiple options) • 3 gaps identified • 58 Templates for first sift • 10 surface transport proposals compressed into 3 options • 1 “no new runways / airport operations max” option • 1 do nothing / assessment of need Result = 3 credible options shortlisted, 1 option subjected to further work to assess credibility

2. How the AC’s assessments differed from Promoters Cost Noise Promoter used different models to assess noise if at all INM v. ANCON No noise measurements • There were many differences in methodology and level of detail between proposals • Comparison required equalisation of methods • Each promoter had different assumptions • Risk amount • Surface transport • Unknown quantity

3. Phase 2 Appraisal Framework in numbers • Over 80 submissions received • 25 objectives • 16 modules • 5 design elements • 3 options to appraise (possibly 4) • 1 business case and appraisal of sustainability per option • 1 consultation Result = Government receives a recommendation of how to ensure the UK maintains its aviation hub status and materials to support preparation of a National Policy Statement

4. Phase 2 Appraisal Framework Operations Economy People Delivery Quality of Life Cost and Commercial Viability Operational RIsk Economy Impacts Community Local Economy Delivery Operational Efficiency Strategic Fit Surface Access Noise Biodiversity Water and Flood Risk Environment Cost Business case Air Quality Carbon Place

5. What’s in a module: Noise Qualitative assessments Tranquility Operations Health Land area Location Measurement Metrics N70, LAeq, LDEN Amenities Technology Households Monetisation Population

6. Noise Scorecards 1

7. Noise Scorecards 2