1 / 6

Feedback on the NIWG meeting held on 2 nd October 2014

Review of issues in FSNMS meeting, including confidence intervals, measurement problems, and lack of supervision. Proposed solutions and objectives for future surveys. Updates on FAO and OCHA meetings, surveys validation, and nutrition situation analysis.

natalie-mcmillan
Download Presentation

Feedback on the NIWG meeting held on 2 nd October 2014

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Feedback on the NIWG meeting held on 2nd October 2014

  2. FSNMS Key concerns in the last FSNMS • Wide confidence intervals • High plausibility • Measurement problems- Weight (salter scale was used) and height • High digit preference • High Oedema cases (47 edema) Possible causes • Sample did not meet the mandatory 25 clusters per state – (ranged from 4-16) • Poor team supervision- lack of commitment/ involvement of many actors • Lack of routine data quality check Way forward • Increase clusters to 25 in each state • Partners commit to supervision of field work • Revise budget and re-allocate including partners • Full proposal presented in the next week NIWG meeting

  3. Seasonality Vs survey timing Objectives of Nutrition surveys • Monitor and evaluate project/program progress • Feed information of severity of food insecurity into IPC analysis • Understand trends/severity of food insecurity • Informing program planning Way-Forward • Feedback on the meeting with FAO and OCHA Food security teams will be presented to the NIWG next week. • Template for 2015 planned surveys to be circulated to the partners for input • Date of planned survey • Area –county • Funding source etc • Required technical support if any

  4. Reviews and validation of surveys • Validated • Renk POC anthropometry and mortality • Renk host community anthropometry • Renk Host community mortality- clarifications sort • CWW and ACF- Torit proposal validated with amendments

  5. Discussion on the Nutrition situation update –Document • All counties with GAM rate above 15% are considered to be vulnerable in terms of nutrition • Areas of GAM above 15% and with access constrains that might hinder response are identified as the most vulnerable counties.

  6. Nutrition information • The survey matrix is on the cluster website https://southsudan.humanitarianresponse.info/document/nutrition-cluster-assessment-database • Program reporting has been very poor –agreed the reporting trend of partners to be presented to the NIWG for further advice

More Related