1 / 32

TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY (TKA) Total Knee Replacement (TKR)

TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY (TKA) Total Knee Replacement (TKR). Introduction. TKA is one of the most successful and commonly performed orthopedic surgery. The best results for TKA at 10 – 15 yrs. compare to or surpass the best result of THA. History of TKR.

nash
Download Presentation

TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY (TKA) Total Knee Replacement (TKR)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY (TKA) Total Knee Replacement(TKR)

  2. Introduction • TKA is one of the most successful and commonly performed orthopedic surgery. • The best results for TKA at 10 – 15 yrs. compare to or surpass the best result of THA.

  3. History of TKR • Gunston, a Canadian surgeon, designed the first polycentric knee in 1968 and published his report in 1971 (Gunston 1971). • Subsequently, Jones, Bryan, and Peterson of the Mayo Clinic detailed their extensive experience with Gunston’s polycentric knee design (Jones 1981).

  4. Indications for Knee Arthroplasty

  5. Indications for TKA • Relieve pain caused by osteoarthritis of the knee (the most common). • Deformity in patients with variable levels of pain: • Flexion contracture > 20 degrees. • Severe varus or valgus laxity.

  6. 项目研究意义 • OA、RA、AS

  7. Osteoarthritis • American College of Rheumatology classification criteria: Knee pain and radiographic osteophytes and at least 1 of the following 3 items: • Age >50 years. • Morning stiffness <=30 minutes in duration. • Crepitus on motion.

  8. Femur • Medial and lateral condyles • Convex, asymmetric • Medial larger than lateral

  9. Tibia L M 1 • Tibial plateau • Medial tibial condyle: concave • Lateral tibial condyle: flat or convex • Medial 50% larger than lateral • Articular cartilage thicker on medial plateau

  10. Menisci • Two fibrocartilaginous discs on tibial plateaus • Attached to each other and surrounding soft tissue • Lateral more mobile • Knee kinematics

  11. Function of menisci • Stability • Increases congruency by deepening the tibial plateau • Distribute loading and act as “shock absorbers” • Mobility • Decreases friction • Must be mobile to avoid injury

  12. Ligaments 1 • Patellar ligament and patellar tendon • Transmit force of quadriceps • Collateral ligaments • Medial-lateral stability • Cruciate ligaments • A-P stability • M-L stability • Knee rotation • Many muscles

  13. Function of the patellofemoral joint 1 • Reduces friction between the quadriceps mechanism and the femur • Mechanical advantage • Increases the quadriceps moment arm

  14. Knee Movement • Three rotations • Sagittal plane: Flexion / Extension • Frontal plane: Abduction / Adduction OR Varus / Valgus • Transverse plane: Internal Rotation / External Rotation • Flexion / extension is coupled with internal / external rotation • Three translations • Anterior / Posterior • Compression / Distraction • Medial / Lateral

  15. Range of motion • 0° to 140° flexion • Range will be dependent on body type • Depends on hip position • A few degrees in abduction/adduction • 45° external to 30° internal rotation • Highly activity and subject-dependent • Motion is more complex than in the hip • Designs that duplicate natural knee motion are more difficult to achieve • Longevity of knees is lower than hips

  16. Total knee arthroplasty • Treatment for joint disease • Osteoarthritis • Degenerative joint disease that causes deterioration of cartilage between bones

  17. Components • Femoral component • Tibial component (tibial base plate) • Bearing surface • Mobile bearing: polyethylene can move relative to the base plate • Fixed bearing: polyethylene is locked to the base plate • Patellar component

  18. TKA design considerations • Movement (kinematics) • Determines range that the implant should be designed for • Femoral rollback and screw home mechanism • Kinetics (joint contact forces) • TKA design (computer models, material selection, dimensions) • TKA standards (how much force must an implant withstand, and at what positions) • TKA testing (real joint simulation)

  19. Classification 1 3 1- Cruciate retaining 2- Cruciate substituting 3- Mobile bearing 4- Unicondylar 4 2

  20. Biomechanics of Knee Arthroplasty

  21. Wear in Hips (THA) versus Knees (TKA) THA TKA • Larger contact area than knee • Surface wear mechanisms: • Abrasion and adhesion • Smaller wear particles • Contact stresses are an order of magnitude higher than hips • Alternating tensile and compressive stresses • Fatigue wear mechanisms: • Delamination, pitting • Larger wear particles

  22. Trade-offs in TKA design geometry • Highly conforming implants • Large contact area  Low contact stress • Prevents translation  Transmits shear stress to fixation interface  Implant loosening • Non-conforming implants • Small contact area  High contact stress  Polyethylene wear  Osteolysis  Implant loosening

  23. A compromise • Mobile bearing TKA • High conformity (good fit), allows translation (low interface stress) • Concerns • Backside wear • Dislocation

  24. To retain the cruciates or not? • Cruciate retaining (PCL intact) • Less conformity • Allows natural femoral rollback • Requires good ligament balancing • Proprioception • Cruciate substituting (posterior stabilized) • More reliable stability (predictable kinematics) • Eliminates possibility of over-tensioning PCL (and the potential for subsequent rupture) • More constrained • Potential for wear on the tibial spine • Possible dislocation

  25. Constraint Cruciate-retaining Varus-valgus Constrained Hinged Cruciate-substituting Least to Most Constrained The goal is to use the least-constrained design that will provide a satisfactory result.

  26. Other designs High flexion knees Revision knees Hemi-arthroplasties Gender specific

  27. Computer-Assisted Orthopaedic Surgery (CAOS) in Arthroplasty • Some form of image or model is produced to represent bones • The bones are tracked throughout surgery. • The surgical tools are also tracked relative to the bone geometry • Software: • Guides the surgeon for bone cuts and implant alignment/insertion • Allows the surgeon to take verification measurements to check that the previous step was correct before moving to the next step.

  28. Hardware • Infrared markers • Active: emit an infrared signal • Passive: reflect infrared radiation from a separate source • Some are fixed to the bone • Others are attached to tools (drills, jigs, probes,…) • Electromagnetic systems are also an option

  29. Types of CAOS • Pre-operatively imaged • Anatomy is imaged using MRI or CT. Models are made from sequential slices for use in the software • Requires a separate imaging session, additional time and cost. Results in patient-specific bone models • Peroperatively imaged • Fluoroscopy (low-dose x-ray) used to obtain images at the time of surgery • Requires extra time, space, and personnel in the OR. Results in patient-specific bone models • Imageless • A generic model is updated with patient measurements during the surgery • Less time and cost associated with imaging. Works well with patients who have typical bone structures. Difficulties arise for patients with significal abnormalities/deformities.

  30. Registration No matter what type of bone model is used (generic or patient-specific), registration is required. Surgeon uses a probe to indicate points or surfaces on the bone that the software will recognize. Accuracy of this step is extremely important.

  31. Advantages/Disadvantages of CAOS • Increased accuracy of implant placement • Many complications/revisions are associated with improper implant placement. • More feedback and verification for the surgeon. Early error detection allows for correction during the surgery. • Documentation: steps are well-documented with quantitative observations that can be used during follow-up or in research studies. • Learning curve for surgeons • Different software may be required for different procedures, sometimes even different implants • Significant costs: • Hardware, software • Additional personnel in the OR • Additional space in the OR • Operations take longer

  32. Thanks for your attention!

More Related