1 / 13

Bloom’s Taxonomy & Instructional Objectives

Bloom’s Taxonomy & Instructional Objectives. Bloom’s Taxonomy. In 1956, Benjamin Bloom headed a group of educational psychologists who developed a classification of levels of intellectual behavior important in learning. This became a taxonomy including three overlapping domains;

nash-richards
Download Presentation

Bloom’s Taxonomy & Instructional Objectives

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Bloom’s Taxonomy & Instructional Objectives

  2. Bloom’s Taxonomy • In 1956, Benjamin Bloom headed a group of educational psychologists who developed a classification of levels of intellectual behavior important in learning. • This became a taxonomy including three overlapping domains; • the cognitive, • the psychomotor, and • the affective.

  3. Bloom’s Taxonomy (cognitive aspects)

  4. Bloom’s Taxonomy

  5. Bloom’s Taxonomy

  6. Bloom’s Taxonomy

  7. Bloom’s Taxonomy

  8. Bloom’s Taxonomy

  9. Bloom’s Taxonomy

  10. Bloom’s as a Hierarchy • It is helpful to think of the hierarchy: • “Knowledge” as lower-level task. • “Evaluate” as upper-level task.

  11. Using Bloom’s Framework? • When to use lower-level objectives? • When to use upper-level objectives? • What constraints (cognitive, etc.) may be of consideration?

  12. Using Bloom’s Framework? • [ask students to consider when to plan/use lower vs. higher-level objectives] when planning material. • E.g. new material should emphasize lower-level objectives. • E.g. concrete thinkers may have difficulty with upper-level type objectives. • Etc.

More Related