200 likes | 310 Views
Capacity Building for Quality Assurance, Accreditation and the Recognition of Qualifications in Syria: Windows of Opportunities. Second Global Forum on “International Quality assurance, Accreditation and the Recognition of Qualifications in Higher Education”
E N D
Capacity Building for Quality Assurance, Accreditation and the Recognition of Qualifications in Syria:Windows of Opportunities Second Global Forum on “International Quality assurance, Accreditation and the Recognition of Qualifications in Higher Education” (Widening Access to Quality Higher Education) June 28-29, 2004 UNESCO, Paris Mohamed Najib Abdul Wahed Ministry of Higher Education, Syria
Outline • Introduction • Syria: the Educational Scene: - the Pattern - the Challenges • The Reform: Strategic Guidelines • The Reform for Quality Assurance: Actions • The Reform for Capacity Building in Quality: Windows of Opportunities
Introduction • Higher education back into the forefront of attention: • Globalization of economies and professional services • Rapid growth and in-depth transformation of Information and Communication Technologies • Explosion in Knowledge • Spiralling Demand for schooling • Increased demand for specialized professionals
Syria: Demographic Information • Population: 17,585,540 (July 2002 est.) • Population growth rate: 2.45% (2003 est.) • High urbaniztion rate: 56% (2002 est.)
Syria: The Educational Scene Number of H.E. Demanders in K Students 132,125 114,298 104,426 96,524
Educational Scene: the Challenges • Intense pressure of numbers of students seeking admission to the university • The female segment of this pressure is significantly high • Vertical expansion has taken place; it originally started in the humanities (literatures and law) but has now expanded into all fields including the sciences and engineering
Educational Scene: the Challenges Driving Forces for the Vertical Expansion : • Bigger age cohorts • Migration to the cities • Larger portion of students who pass the secondary school exams and • Fewer chances to study abroad (however, more than 4000 students go abroad each year)
Educational Scene: the Challenges • Secondary school examination is of a general nature or is not much differentiated into concentrations or pre-specialisation fields of study • Factors working to the detriment of quality and relevance of university education: • Universities stress rote learning and memorisation of facts and do not encourage creative thinking • Poor mechanisms to evaluate student learning outcomes
Educational Scene: the Challenges • Factors working to the detriment of quality and relevance of university education: • Employment and staffing policies in the sector mirror those of the public sector at large: overstaffing and poor remuneration • Centralized decision-making: Education-related decisions are highly centralized • Quality standards are poorely defined: structure, curriculum, teaching material, faculty, research effort, … • Quality control mechanisms are not adequately formalized
The Reform: Strategic Guidelines • Expansion of higher education coverage (widening access) in a sustainable way: • The criteria used for admission • Diversification of programs • Improvement of educational quality, competency and relevance • Introduction of effective governance structures and management practices
The Reform: Strategic Guidelines • Enhancing the quantity, quality and relevance of scientific, basic and applied research • Promotion of entrepreneurship and innovation skills within graduates to stimulate their capabilities in self-job creation • Strengthening university-industry linkages and supporting joint actions between universities/research institutes and the private sector
The Reform: Actions Related to Quality • Establishment of a National Quality Assurance and Accreditation Committee • Individual Initiatives by some Universities • Regional Initiatives: • Recommendations of Arab Ministries of Higher Education • Union for Arab Universities Action • International-Cooperation Initiatives: • Tempus Program • UNDP Initiative
Actions Related to Quality Establishment of a National Quality Assurance and Accreditation Committee: • In a very early stage of development • Affiliated to the Council of Higher Education • Objectives: • Developing Quality Assurance Plans and Strategies • Setting up quality standards • Establishing Quality Assurance and Accreditation units in Universities • Organizing workshops and awareness campaigns
Actions Related to Quality Individual Initiatives by some universities: • Damascus University: • An evaluation process covering: • Staff self evaluation. • Peer Evaluation. • Faculty member evaluation by student.
Actions Related to Quality • Regional Initiatives: • Recommendations of Arab Ministries of Higher • Education: • Establishing National QAA Board in each Arab Country • Establishing the Arab QAA Board • Actions undertaken by ALECSO and a special follow-up committee • Union for Arab Universities Action
Actions Related to Quality • International-Cooperation Initiatives: • Tempus Program:QUALITY EVALUATION, REGION MEDA (EVQUA-MEDA) OBJECTIVES: Creating or Reinforcing National Systems and/or Regional Quality Evaluation Networks in Higher Education, Based on Pilot Evaluation of Engineering Education Methodology and inventory - Methodology for the assessment of engineering education - Description of the national HE systems - Presentation of Engineering education in the partner countries
Actions Related to Quality • International-Cooperation Initiatives: • UNDP Initiative: « Enhancement of the quality of academic programs in Arab Universities and the planning efficiency of Higher Education Systems » • A Regional Network of University Database • Assessing the Quality of Programs in Computer Science and Business Administration with Reference to Internationally Established Criteria, Procedures and Benchmarks in 20 Universities
Actions Related to Quality: Main Constraints to Capacity Building • Lack of Qualified Human Resources: The knowledge Gap • Lack of Assessment Culture: The Culture Gap • Reluctance to “Imported” or “Ready made” programs. It has been shown that any Quality Assessment and/or Assurance program should: • Preserve the National Culture and Identity • Be on a Bottom-up Approach Basis • Lack of Sustainability. How to preserve the capacity once built?
Capacity Building for Quality Assurance: Windows of opportunities • Networking • Harnessing Technology • Leapfrogging (Islands of Excellence) • Promoting Mobility • Disseminating the Culture of Assessment • Producing knowledge (joint research programs)
Integrated Quality Model in Higher Education Input Output Process Realized Mission Mission Statement Management Study Programs Graduates Achieved Goals Policy Goals & Aims Staff Research Projects Scientific Production Achieved Outcomes Students Expected Outcomes Funding Satisfaction Stakeholders Community Services Services Facilities