1 / 47

Dryvit vs. Competitive Wall Claddings “The 80%”

Dryvit vs. Competitive Wall Claddings “The 80%”. Objectives: Be an “influencer”. How to more effectively present the case for Outsulation: Energy Codes Competitive Claddings – The “80%” LEED Case Study Resources. Understanding the Energy Code Changes. Segment Objectives.

mikkel
Download Presentation

Dryvit vs. Competitive Wall Claddings “The 80%”

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Dryvit vs.Competitive Wall Claddings“The 80%”

  2. Objectives: Be an “influencer” How to more effectively present the case for Outsulation: • Energy Codes • Competitive Claddings – The “80%” • LEED • Case Study Resources

  3. Understanding the Energy Code Changes

  4. Segment Objectives • Dryvit OutsulationSystems • Energy Codes and Standards • The “Dryving” forces • IECC / ASHRAE 90.1-2010 • What is in effect and where? • Advantage Dryvit Outsulation Systems

  5. Energy Codes and Standards • International Code Council (ICC) • International Building Code (IBC) • International Residential Code (IRC) • International Energy Conservation Code (IECC) – 2003, 2006, 2009, 2012 • International Green Construction Code (IGCC) – 2012 • ASHRAE Standard 90.1 – 2004, 2007, 2010 • Will pair with IECC 2009 and 2012 respectively • ASHRAE Standard 189.1 – 2010 • Will pair with IGCC 2012

  6. Energy Codes and Standards • The Bottom Line for Dryvit • Building design going forward will require: • Improved energy efficiency • Reduced air infiltration • Require exterior continuous insulation (ci) for most of the United States • Require Air / water-resistive barriers • Leading to building air infiltration testing • Reduced allowable window area • Creating increased wall sf for Dryvit

  7. Energy Code Changes – Why? • Buildings built prior to 1980 have little or no insulation value • 75% of these buildings will still be in use in 2050 • New Government Energy Consumption Mandates • 30-50 % improvements in energy efficiency • New Construction and existing buildings • Net Zero energy buildings are the long term goal (2030) • Energy used = Energy produced (renewable energy)

  8. Energy Code Changes – Why? • Thermal Bridging – energy escape through stud framing in traditional cavity insulated wall assembly Continuous Insulation mitigates Thermal Bridging

  9. Energy Codes and Standards What is the next step in Codes and Standards ??? • IBC 2012 – released April 2012 • IECC 2012 (1) • ASHRAE Standard 90.1 – 2010 • Nearly same as 90.1-2007 (2) • International Green Construction Code (IGCC) – 2012 (3) • ASHRAE Standard 189.1 (4) • Design Standard for High Performance Green Buildings • Substantial changes • Makes much of LEED voluntary elements “mandatory” We are working with 4 or more energy codes

  10. October 18, 2013 “All states shall adopt ASHRAE Standard 90.1-2010 (part of IECC 2012) as their minimum energy code by October 18, 2013” – DOE Mandate • Steel framed – CI required for climate zones 3 – 8 • Maximum Fenestration (window) at 40% of wall • Requires Air Barrier and Penetration Transition Detailing • Sheathing joints and all penetrations shall be, “wrapped, sealed, caulked, gasketed, or taped” • Creates Demand for Dryvit Backstop NT and Aqua Flash

  11. CI Required for Climate Zones 3 – 8 90% of the United States

  12. CI Requirements by Climate Zone California calls for some level of CI throughout the state

  13. Summary / Resources • Within the changes to the Energy Code, Dryvit Outsulation Systems . . . • Provide Continuous Insulation (CI) • Eliminate Thermal Bridging • Incorporate Air Barrier Solutions • Backstop NT / AquaFlash • Resources • Energy / Code White paper

  14. Dryvit vs.Competitive Claddings

  15. Segment Objectives • Dryvit OutsulationSystems • Comparison to other Claddings Options • The other “80%” of commercial wall surfaces • Alternate Cladding Wall Sections / Details • What other claddings require

  16. Understanding the Wall Assembly • “Whole Wall” Assembly • Competitive Claddings (Brick, Limestone, Granite, Metal Panels, Stucco) are assemblies of different manufacturers, installers and warranties • Air / water-resistive barrier / Flashing • Ties and Anchors • Insulation • Brick, granite, limestone, metal panel, stucco • Mortar, grout • Drainage / weep components • Structure – shelf angles / lintels / widened footing – foundation • Requires significant coordination

  17. Typical Cladding DetailingNon-Continuous Insulation • Heavy claddings such as brick require a foundation / structure to set / bear on • Formed bearing ledge • Widened foundation wall • Widened footing • Widened excavation / trench • i.e. – more concrete • Base wall Flashing • Mortar net / weeps

  18. Typical Cladding DetailingNon-Continuous Insulation • Related building envelope components – such as windows / doors, etc. – are not “standardized” for an increase in wall thickness

  19. Typical Cladding DetailingContinuous Insulation • When you push a heavy veneer off the wall, every assocaited component increases in size

  20. Typical Cladding DetailingContinuous Insulated • And in many cases, the heavy veneer / cladding must be “returned” to the wall to close the cavity Window / Door / Louver Jamb Detail

  21. Typical Cladding DetailingContinuous Insulation • Additional structural elements become very complex and expensive • Floorline bearing angle Bearing angle tight to structure is a “thermal bridge”

  22. Typical Cladding DetailingContinuous Insulated • Floorline bearing angle • Thermal bridging ?

  23. Cladding Comparison Matrix Dryvit Outsulation vs. Brick / Masonry Veneer

  24. Cladding Comparison Matrix Dryvit Outsulation vs. Granite & Limestone

  25. Cladding Comparison Matrix Dryvit Outsulation vs. Metal Panel

  26. Cladding Comparison Matrix Dryvit Outsulation vs. Conventional Stucco

  27. Cladding Comparison Matrix • General Summary • Dryvit Outsulation Systems measure up very well against alternative commercial claddings . . . • Continuous Insulation (CI) • Air Barrier • Thermal Bridging Resistance • R-value Contribution • Freedom for Architectural Style • Various Texture Options • Single Source Wall Assembly Warranty • Weight - lbs /sq ft

  28. Summery / Resources • Dryvit Outsulation Systems measure up very well against alternative commercial claddings . . . • Continuous Insulation (CI) • Air / Water-Resistive Barrier • Thermal Bridging Resistance / Added R-value • Freedom for Architectural Style • Color / Texture / Finish options • Single Source Wall Assembly Warranty • Lightweight / Cost Effective • Resources • Cladding Comparison sheets • Specialty Finishes brochures • Specialty Finishes samples • Case studies

  29. Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design(LEED)

  30. Segment Objectives • Dryvit OutsulationSystems • Opportunities to influence LEED Points • What is LEED • Target Categories / Points • Where Architects should really be looking

  31. LEED - Measuring Green • Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) • Implemented in 1998 by the US Green Building council (USGBC) • Comprehensive approach to sustainability • Sustainable / green building rating system • Based on a point / credit measurement system • Not product specific but rather “performance” specific • Third party certification program • LEED v3.0 / 2009 • Adopted April 2009 LEED 2012 on hold till June, 2013

  32. LEED - Measuring Green • LEED for New Construction (NC) includes Major Renovation, Schools and Core & Shell Development • Broken down into 7 Categories • Sustainable Sites (SS) 26 pts. • Water Efficiency (WE) 10 pts. • Energy & Atmosphere (AE) 35 pts. • Materials & Resources (MR) 14 pts. • Indoor Environmental Quality (EQ) 15 pts. Sub-Total 100 pts. • Innovative Design (ID) 6 pts. • Regional Priority (RP) 4 pts. Total 110 pts.

  33. LEED - Measuring Green • Dryvit Outsulation - Potential Contribution to LEED • Materials and Resources (MR) NC SchoolsC&S • Credit 1.1 – Building Reuse 1 – 3 1 – 2 1 – 5 • Credit 2 – Construction Waste Management 1 – 2 1 – 2 1 – 2 • Credit 4 – Recycled Content 1 – 2 1 – 2 1 – 2 • Credit 5 – Regional Materials 1 – 2 1 – 2 1 – 2 • Indoor Environmental Quality (IEQ) • Credit 7.1 – Thermal Comfort: Design 1 1 1 • Innovation In Design (ID) • Credit 1 – Innovation in Design 1 – 5 1 – 4 1 – 5 • Energy and Atmosphere (EA) • Credit 1 - Optimized Energy Performance 1 – 19 1 – 19 3 – 21 Total 7 – 337 – 31 9 – 37 LEED Certified = 40 – 49 pts

  34. Recycled Content • Dryvit Outsulation Plus MD – example • Recycled Content – Based on % weight per total weight of packaging • Backstop NT Air / Water-Resistive Barrier 0.0 lbs. • Primus DM (Dry Mix) Adhesive / Base Coat 1.5 lbs / 50 lb bag • EPS Insulation – thickness as specified 0.0 lbs • Reinforcing Mesh 0.0 lbs • Color Prime 0.025 lbs / 50 lb pail • Sandpebble Fine Textured Finish 0.035 lbs / 70 lb pail • Mojave E Finish as an alternate3.2 lbs / 40 lb pail (8%)

  35. Regional Materials500 Mile Radius Allowance Area Within 500 miles of Manufacturing

  36. LEED - Measuring Green • Innovation and Design • Credit 1 – Innovation In Design • Opportunity to achieve exceptional performance above the LEED requirements – For Example: • Outsulation Solutions are lightweight • This translates to • “Lower resources” demand • Reduced carbon footprint • Reduced embodied energy 25,000 sf = 1 million pounds

  37. LEED - Measuring Green • Energy and Atmosphere (EA) • Credit 1 – Optimize Energy Performance • Option 1 – Whole Building Energy Simulation • Demonstrate % improvement in the proposed building performance rating compared with the baseline building performance rating • Using computer simulation modeling • Modeling predicts the energy consumption of a specific building design • Accounts for the positive effects of continuous insulation • Accounts for the positive benefits of air barriers • Accounts for the negative aspects of thermal bridging • A tight and well insulated building envelope is the key to cost-effective reduction in energy consumption 1-19 Points (NC / Schools) – 3-21 Points (CS)

  38. LEED - Measuring Green • Energy and Atmosphere (EA) • Credit 1 – Whole Building Energy Simulation New BuildingExisting BuildingPoints (NC & Schools)Points (CS) 12% 8% 1 3 14% 10% 2 4 18% 14% 4 6 22% 18% 6 8 26% 22% 8 10 30% 26% 10 12 46% 42% 18 20 48% 44% 1921

  39. Summary / Resources • When targeting LEED Categories / Points, Dryvit Outsulation Systems . . . • Have substantial impact for Energy and Atmosphere, Credit 1 – Optimized Energy Performance • Provide Continuous Insulation (CI) • Eliminate air infiltration • Dramatically improve energy efficiency • Supports Point achievement in EA Credit 1 • Up to 19 points for new construction (NC) • Up to 21 points for core & shell construction Be an Influencer – Get your LEED GA Credential

  40. Metro Career AcademyCase Study Pulling it all together

  41. Segment Objectives • Dryvit OutsulationSystems • Lowest Initial Cost and Value Engineering • MCA case study – PULLING IT ALL TOGETHER • Bringing “Value” to Value Engineering • Maintaining “Aesthetics” • Engaging early in the Design Process

  42. Construction Cost Case Study • Oklahoma City, OK – “Brick Town USA”

  43. MCA Savings – Installed SF Cost Original Costs: 37,000 sf of Wall • Brick & Limestone – original design • $ 25.99/sq.ft. = $961,594.00 • 4” Outsulation Plus MD – value engineered • $ 13.54/sq.ft. = $ 501,000.00 • Outsulation Plus MD Savings = $ 460,594.00 Associated Costs: • 17.57 fewer cubic yards of concrete: • $6,149.50 • 13.45 fewer tons of structural steel: • $ 44,385.00 • Additional Savings = $ 50,534.50 Total Direct Savings = $ 561,128.50

  44. MCA Savings – Time Trimmed 10 weeks off Construction Schedule

  45. MCA – LEED Gold Certification USGBC LEED 2.2 Checklist Earned all 10 Points in Energy & Atmosphere

  46. Savings – ROI Energy Conservation: • Energy Code Wall Design (IBC 06 / IECC 03) Required: MCA As Built: R-8 / U-0.125 R-22 / U-0.045 • Estimated Energy Cost: Per Standard: MCA As Built: $ 78,440.00 $ 44,388.00 • A Savings of $ 34,052.00 per year! • 50 Year Life Cycle Savings of: $ 1,702.600.00 !! $ 3,700 a month less than a comparable facility.

  47. Thank you for your time! Questions?

More Related