1 / 35

Dr. Martin S. Shapiro California State University, Fresno Dr. Spencer Behmer Oxford University

Learning in an insect herbivore: How rewards affect color and odor discrimination in a hungry locust. Dr. Martin S. Shapiro California State University, Fresno Dr. Spencer Behmer Oxford University Corlisa Belt Oxford University. Animals in Psychology. Mollusks. Honeybees.

Download Presentation

Dr. Martin S. Shapiro California State University, Fresno Dr. Spencer Behmer Oxford University

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Learning in an insect herbivore: How rewards affect color and odor discrimination in a hungry locust. • Dr. Martin S. Shapiro • California State University, Fresno • Dr. Spencer Behmer • Oxford University • Corlisa Belt • Oxford University

  2. Animals in Psychology

  3. Mollusks

  4. Honeybees

  5. Schistocerca gregaria

  6. Two-Sided Y-Maze Two-sided Y-maze

  7. Enclosure

  8. Experiment 1 • Color discrimination: Yellow and Green. • Amount of reward: 3 mg vs. 12 mg wheat grass. • Nine choices: Equated experience with both options. • Measured: Choice and response Latency. • n = 12

  9. Enter Time Choice of Green

  10. Approach Time

  11. Exit Time

  12. Forced Exposure

  13. Choice of Yellow

  14. CHOICE

  15. CHOICE

  16. Enter Time

  17. Approach Time

  18. Exit Time

  19. Experiment 2 • Odor Discrimination: Peppermint and Lemon. • Amount of reward: 3 mg vs. 12 mg. • Nine choices: Equated experience with both options. • Reversed: Rewards reversed for each option for an additional 9 choice runs (18 choices in total). • n = 12

  20. Odor Arm

  21. CHOICE

  22. CHOICE

  23. Enter Time

  24. Approach Time

  25. Exit Time

  26. Experiment 3 • Odor Discrimination: Peppermint and Lemon. • Artificial Diet: • 21% protein : 21% carbohydrate • 7% protein : 7% carbohydrate • Nine choices: Equated Experience with both options. • n = 12

  27. CHOICE

  28. Enter Time

  29. Approach Time P = 0.038

  30. Exit Time

  31. Summary • Good choice results. • Good discrimination of color and odor. (odor showed less bias.) • Approach time was significant in all three experiments. by latency

  32. Continuing work at Cal State Fresnowith Schistocerca americana

  33. Future Experiments • Delay to Reinforcement. • Self Control. • Risk Sensitivity. • Energy Expenditures. • Effects of Carbohydrates and Proteins on Learning. • Nutrient-Specific Deprivation. • Risk Sensitivity with variability in specific nutrients.

  34. THANK YOU!!!

More Related