1 / 8

Neutral Current: Ongoing Systematic Studies and loose ends

Neutral Current: Ongoing Systematic Studies and loose ends. Chris Cormack Alexander Kappes Henning Schnurbusch Matthias Moritz Ricardo Gonçalo. SFEW Review Meeting 4 th December 2001. Photoproduction normalisation: Henning

merv
Download Presentation

Neutral Current: Ongoing Systematic Studies and loose ends

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Neutral Current: Ongoing Systematic Studies and loose ends Chris Cormack Alexander Kappes Henning Schnurbusch Matthias Moritz Ricardo Gonçalo SFEW Review Meeting 4th December 2001 • Photoproduction normalisation: Henning • First inner ring and hadronization + Checks of new MEPS sample: Ricardo Review Meeting 4th December 2001

  2. Selection cuts: • DST bit 12 • Q2DA > 120 GeV2 • Elumi- < 2 GeV (avoid bremstrahlung) • 5 GeV < Elumi-e < 15 GeV (acceptance) • ET > 30 GeV • |Z-vertex| < 50 cm • EelectronCAL > 10 GeV Photoproduction normalisation Energy spectrum from Lumi-e detector for loose DIS cuts and Elumi-< 2GeV E-pZ distribution with loose DIS cuts: MC generated with Et>30GeV Review Meeting 4th December 2001

  3. Photoproduction normalisation Herwig Et>30GeV + DJANGOH & Herwig Et>10GeV (direct PhP only) + DJANGOH Herwig Et>10GeV (direct PhP only) & Pythia 96/97 (some visible DIS contribution) Review Meeting 4th December 2001

  4. Hadronization and FCAL Inner Ring From September Review Meeting: Ariadne reproduces the data except in FCAL 1st IR This affects low y / high x / low had Need a good systematic error estimation in IR: Now: Ariadne  |Ariadne - MEPS| will be used as systematic error for several effects FCAL Inner Ring: several studies done  - remove IR energy from DA calculations for had > 0.314rad ?(??????) - vary energy scale in IR ?  - take cells for low had or do W cut à la 96/97 ? (problem with large syst. error)  - Vary remnant parameters in MC? (no noticeable effect on en.flow) To do:  Use all MC for better stats  Redo properly with CureMyCalDoc • Remove IR energy from DA calculations for had > 0.314rad ? • Vary energy scale in IR ? • Take cells for low had or do W cut à la 96/97 ? • Vary remnant parameters in Monte Carlo ? • To do: • Use all MC for better stats • Redo properly with CureMyCalDoc Review Meeting 4th December 2001

  5. Hadronization and FCAL Inner Ring Sources of systematic error (hard to disentagle): Combined systematic error determination: ? For most of the phase space: Ariadne  |Ariadne - MEPS| Hadronisation (parton showers) ? Imprecise dead material map • Systematic for low y region: • Is the had measurement at high y affect by the very forward region ? • Island -> Cells splitting ? • WJB > 20 GeV cut ? • Ariadne  |Ariadne - MEPS| - is this sufficient? Angular non-uniformities of detector response ? ? Modelling of remnant FPC-FCAL leakage & backscattering ? Review Meeting 4th December 2001

  6. (Preliminary from Matthias & Henning) Eff = 50% but Syst Err = 140% (island splitting) Error > 50% Hadronisation at low y : Island -> cell splitting • Do sum over cells for islands in FCAL with radius < 30 cm: • For the reduced cross section, systematic errors around 2% except at low yDA • One good bin shows very large effect Review Meeting 4th December 2001

  7. Old MEPS (e+p) islands New MEPS (e-p) islands Old MEPS (e+p) cells New MEPS (e-p) cells Checks of new MEPS sample Current MEPS sample was generated with Soft colour Interactions card ON New sample being generated for e-p: number of vertex refitted tracks now agrees with data Old and new sample seem to agree well in the hadronic energy flow: BUT Review Meeting 4th December 2001

  8. Checks of new MEPS sample - R.G. Review Meeting 4th December 2001

More Related