200 likes | 354 Views
This presentation from the Technion Electrical Engineering Department explores the integration challenges of System-on-Chip (SoC) designs, emphasizing the effectiveness of Quality of Service (QoS) Network-on-Chip (QNoC) architecture. As chip density grows, traditional interfaces pose significant design complexities and performance unpredictability. We propose a scalable and modular solution using QNoC that enhances communication while simplifying integration and verification processes. Automation tools facilitate the design, placement, and verification of QNoC systems. For more details, visit www.ee.technion.ac.il/qnoc.
E N D
Electrical Engineering Department, Technion, Haifa, Israel Automatic Hardware-Efficient SoC Integrationby QoS Network on Chip Evgeny Bolotin, Arkadiy Morgenshtein, Israel Cidon, Ran Ginosar, Avinoam Kolodny QNoC Research Group, Electrical Engineering Department Technion – Israel Institute of Technology Haifa, Israel
Outline • Introduction: SoC Integration Challenge • NoC Concept and QNoC Architecture • SoC Automatic Integration by QNoC • Summary
The Integration Challenge: Growing Chip Density • Design complexity - High IP reuse • Scalable and Efficient, High Performance Interconnect • Integration Challenge 1998 Asic - 0.35 mm 2004 SoC – 90 nm Memory, I/O P
The Growing Gap: Computation vs. Communication From ITRS, 2001
Traditional SoC Nightmare • Variety of dedicated interfaces • Poor separation between computation and communication. • Design and Verification Complexity • Unpredictable performance
Solution – Network on Chip (NoC) • Scalability • Concurrency, effective spatial reuse of resources • Higher bandwidth • Higher levels of abstraction • Modularity – Productivity Improvement Easier SoC Integration!
NoC vs. “Off-Chip” Networks What is Different? • Routers on Planar Grid Topology • Short PTP Links between routers • Unique VLSI Cost Sensitivity: • Area-Routers and Links • Power
Example1: Replace modules Replace NoC vs. “Off-Chip Networks” • No legacy protocols to be compliant with … • No software simple and hardware efficient protocols • Different operating env. (no dynamic changes and failures) • Custom Network Design – You design what you need!
Adapt Links NoC vs. “Off-Chip Networks” Example2: Adapt Links Example3: Trim Unnecessary (ports, buffers, routers, links)
QNoC: QoS NoC Define Service Levels (SLs): • Signaling • Real-Time • Read/Write (RD/WR) • Block-Transfer • Different QoS for each SL
QNoC Architecture • Mesh Topology • Fixed shortest path routing (X-Y) • Simple Router (no tables, simple logic) • No deadlock scenario • Power efficient communication • Wormhole Routing • For reduced buffering
QNoC Wormhole Router Output Port Input Port
System Integration and Verification SoC development with QNoC System Architecture Definition
Integration Automation Tools QNoC Placement and Topology Generation • Analyzes System Modules and Traffic • Derives NoC Topology and Module Placement • Minimizes Spatial Traffic Density For Lower Area and Power
Integration Automation Tools QNoC Customization • Maze-Router – for efficient packet routing • Link Load Calculator – for capacity allocation • QNoC Network Simulator – for QoS assuring Simulated QoS Placed Modules Relative Link Load
Integration Automation Tools Automatic Hardware Generation • Use calculated QNoC parameters and QNoC VHDL templates library • Create Synthesizable VHDL description of QNoC • Including • Module wrappers • Synchronization and SER/DES circuitry • Routing logic and tables System Verification • QNoC verification models • For hardware and system simulations
Summary • SoC Integration Challenge • NoC Concept • QNoC Architecture • SoC Integration by QNoC • Automatic Integration Tools
More Info: www.ee.technion.ac.il/qnoc