1 / 26

Toward option values of near machine precision using Gaussian Quadrature

Toward option values of near machine precision using Gaussian Quadrature. San–Lin Chung Department of Finance National Taiwan University Taipei 106. Taiwan, R.O.C. Mark B. Shackleton Department of Accounting and Finance Lancaster University, LA1 4YX, UK. Abstract.

mattox
Download Presentation

Toward option values of near machine precision using Gaussian Quadrature

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Toward option values of near machine precision using Gaussian Quadrature San–Lin Chung Department of Finance National Taiwan University Taipei 106. Taiwan, R.O.C. Mark B. Shackleton Department of Accounting and Finance Lancaster University, LA1 4YX, UK.

  2. Abstract In this paper, we combine the best features of two highly successful Quadrature option pricing papers. Adopting the recombining abscissa or node approach used in Andricopoulos, Widdicks, Duck, and Newton (2003) (AWDN) with the Gauss Legendre method of Sullivan (2000) yields highly accurate and efficient option prices for a range of standard and exotic specifications including barrier, compound, reset and spread options.

  3. Introduction • Numerical integration is at the heart of almost all option pricing. • Numerical integration involves evaluation and summation of an integrand (typically the maximum of a payoff or a continuation value) with probability weights over a number of particular stock price points.

  4. Introduction • Tree or finite difference techniques perform the valuation and interim storage activity by “integrating” over a regular series of locations (triangular or rectangular). • Most efficient exotic options algorithms require storage structures that can be adapted to the payoff in question on the exotic; e.g. it is usually easier to price a barrier option if a node is located on the barrier at each barrier monitoring time. See Boyle and Lau (1994) and Ritchken (1995) etc.

  5. Introduction • Against node positioning flexibility we also need to avoid the so called curse of dimensionality where (unless self similar structures are employed) the number of required calculations increases geometrically with the number of time slices considered.  i.e. avoid using non-recombining trees! See Amin (1991) and Ho, Stapleton, and Subrahmanyam (1995) etc.

  6. Literature Review Omberg (1988) – Gauss-Hermite method -- Introduce the idea of Gauss Hermite method into the lattice approach. Sullivan (2000) – Gassian Legendre method -- First apply Gassian Legendre method to option pricing. Andricopoulos, Widdicks, Duck, Newton (2003) – Simpson’s Rule

  7. Numerical option valuation A typical option valuation problem is like: It essentially involves numerical integration in the above problem.

  8. Numerical option valuation The disadvantage in Sullivan (2000) method is that the abscissasin next period depends on the previous period. Therefore it is path dependent in the sense that number of nodes will increase exponentially.

  9. Numerical option valuation The advantage in AWDN (2003) method is that the abscissasin next period can chosen arbitrarily.Therefore it is path independent in the sense that number ofnodes will increase linearly.

  10. Numerical option valuation Simple and Gauss Legendre Quadrature

  11. Numerical option valuation

  12. Numerical option valuation In Sullivan (2000), approximation errors will dominate the other numerical errors in the integration procedure.

  13. Option types and benchmark prices • European call • Discrete and moving barrier options • Compound/installment call and Bermudan put • American call with variable strike/dividends • Reset calls and puts • Spread options • Options under GARCH processes

  14. Numerical results(1/2) Table 1: European call options under constant volatility Table 2: Comparing with AWDN (2003) Table 3: Daily reset option Table 4: European exchange and spread option

  15. Numerical results(2/2) Table 5: European put option under GARCH process (Duan and Simonato (2001)) Figure 1: Accuracy/Speed test with existing methods for pricing Bermudan put options Figure 2: Accuracy/Speed test with existing methods for pricing barrier options

  16. Conclusion • High convergence order is not necessary the high accuracy method unless the integrand is a smooth function of the variables. • Most option values are smooth functions of state variables. Some exotic options need special treatment. For these options, we divide the integration range into subsets and the option value in each subset is a smooth function of the underlying variable(s).

  17. Conclusion • We try to claim that most numerical option valuation problems in the Black-Scholes economy is ending!! • Our method provides benchmark values for testing other numerical techniques. • Our method is potentially useful for empirical research using American and exotic option data.

  18. Table 1 : European call options under constant volatility

  19. Figure 1 : Accuracy/Speed test with existing methods for pricing American options

  20. Figure 2 : Accuracy/Speed test with existing methods for pricing barrier options

More Related