1 / 25

Absence of Diffusion in a Nonlinear Schrödinger Equation with a Random Potential

Absence of Diffusion in a Nonlinear Schrödinger Equation with a Random Potential. Shmuel Fishman, Avy Soffer and Yevgeny Krivolapov. The Equation. 1D lattice version. 1D continuum version. Anderson Model. are random. Experimental Relevance. Nonlinear Optics

Download Presentation

Absence of Diffusion in a Nonlinear Schrödinger Equation with a Random Potential

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Absence of Diffusion in a Nonlinear Schrödinger Equation with a Random Potential Shmuel Fishman, Avy Soffer and Yevgeny Krivolapov

  2. The Equation 1D lattice version 1D continuum version Anderson Model are random

  3. Experimental Relevance • Nonlinear Optics • Bose Einstein Condensates, aka Gross-Pitaevskii (GP) equation.

  4. What is known ? • Localization: At high disorder all the eigenstates of almost every realization of the disorder are exponentially localized. • Dynamical Localization: Any transfer or spreading of wavepackets is suppressed.

  5. Does Dynamical localization survive nonlinearity ? • Yes, if there is spreading the magnitude of the nonlinear term decreases and localization takes over. • Depends, assume localization length is then the relevant energy spacing is , the perturbation because of the nonlinear term is and all depends on (Shepelyansky) • No, there will be spreading for every value of (Flach) • Yes, because quasiperiodic localized perturbation does not destroy localization (Soffer, Wang-Bourgain)

  6. Numerical Simulations • In regimes relevant for experiments looks that localization takes place • Scattering results (Paul, Schlagheck, Leboeuf, Pavloff, Pikovsky) • Spreading for long time. Finite time-step integration, no convergence to true solution, due to Chaos effects (Shepelyansky, Pikovsky, Molina, Flach, Aubry).

  7. Pikovsky, Shepelyansky S.Flach, D.Krimer and S.Skokos t

  8. Pikovsky, Shepelyansky

  9. Problem of all numerics Asymptotics problem: It is impossible to decide whether there is a saturation in the expansion of the wavefunction. In any case it looks like the expansion is very slow, at most sub-diffusional. Convergence: All long time numerics are done without convergence to true solution. Time scale: The time scale of the problem is not clear

  10. Our result • For times the wavepacket is exponentially localized, namely, no spreading takes place.

  11. Perturbation Theory The nonlinear Schrödinger Equation on a Lattice in 1D random Anderson Model Eigenstates

  12. Enumeration of eigenstates Anderson model eigenstates where is the localization center and Since it was proven* that there is a finite number of eigenstates for any finite box around we will enumerate the eigenstates using their localization center. * F. Nakano, J. Stat. Phys. 123, 803 (2006)

  13. Overlap of the range of the localization length Perturbation expansion is a remainder of the expansion that start at Iterative calculation of

  14. start at Example: The first order The first problem: Secular terms The second problem: Small denominator problem

  15. Elimination of secular terms For example:

  16. The problem of small denominators example Fractional moments approach (Aizenman - Molchanov)

  17. arbitrary Localized eigenstates Chebychev

  18. where indicates a generic sum of energies. Bounding the remainder: Lowest order

  19. Integrating and taking the absolute value gives Using the assumption and integrating by parts we get the bootstrap equation Setting validates the bootstrap assumption.

  20. Main Result • Starting from a localized state the wave function is exponentially bounded for time of the order of

  21. The logarithmic spreading conjecture • Wei-Min Wang conjectured that the solutions do not spread faster than (possibly logarithmically) in a meeting in June 2008 (Technion). It was based on her paper (with Z. Zhang): "Long time Anderson localization for nonlinear random Schroedinger equation", ArXiv 0805.3520, which she presented during this meeting. She made a similar conjecture earlier in a private communication. • We conjectured that the spreading of solutions is at most like in meetings that took place in December 2007 in talks by S. Fishman (IHP/Paris) and Y. Krivolapov (Weizmann). It was based on work in progress assuming that the remainder term can be bounded.

  22. Questions • How can one understand the numerical results? Are they transient ? • Is there a time-scale for cross-over, and what is its experimental relevance ? • Does localization survive sufficiently strong nonlinearity? • What is the physics of ?

More Related