1 / 23

New WebLearn Service – Feb 2008

New WebLearn Service – Feb 2008. Adam Marshall, Learning Technologies Group, OUCS, Oxford University. Objectives of Talk. Sakai vs Bodington Toolset Content migration Timeline / Plan Pilots How to follow progress. Current Situation.

Download Presentation

New WebLearn Service – Feb 2008

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. New WebLearn Service – Feb 2008 Adam Marshall, Learning Technologies Group, OUCS, Oxford University.

  2. Objectives of Talk • Sakai vs Bodington • Toolset • Content migration • Timeline / Plan • Pilots • How to follow progress

  3. Current Situation • Based on Bodington OSS (http://tinyurl.com/2ldmny) • Campus metaphor: buildings, floors, rooms • OUCS introduced in 2003-2004 • Production service from 2004 • 2004: 3411 users, 19464 resources, 614109 hits/week • 2005: 4781 users, 33040 resources, 1020362 hits/week • 2006: 6790 users, 41317 resources, 1831079 hits/week • Med Sci (32%), Life Sci (22%), Humanities (18%) • 50% registered Oxford users have logged in • most departments and 1/3 colleges on board • Same team for both systems: less Bodington development now. Thinner upgrades.

  4. Why Change? • Bodington community too small: 3 HEIs • Leeds & UHI replacing Bodington anyway • Out of date software: poor architecture • Lack of tools • Current situation is unsustainable

  5. WebLearn Future • Strategic decision to shift delivery framework to Sakai (sakaiproject.org) • Called ‘WebLearn Beta’ • Will run in parallel with Bodington for 2 years. Dual service: ‘WebLearn’ • Addresses many user requests • Will maintain most Bodington tools / services

  6. Why Sakai? • Sakai satisfies all original requirements: • Flexibility, devolved administration, group management, news, calendars, tracking, assessment, personal space, timed-release, syllabus info, …. http://tinyurl.com/yvf3mj • Enterprise application • Better OSS model & community (Affiliates: Oracle, IBM, Sun; Support: rSmart, Unicon) • Large user-base • Good UK community (Cambridge, Hull, CCLRC, Lancaster)

  7. Sakai USPs • Cleaner interface • Better usability and accessibility • Simpler access control!!! • Extensive documentation incl. videos • More tools (see later) • File management vastly improved • Easy bulk upload: webDAV • ‘Proper’ search (indexes Word docs, PDF, PPT) • Site statistics • Facebook iGoogle integration • Oodles more…….

  8. Tool Comparison • Most Bodington tools are bettered • Maybe not: logbook and peer marking. • Survey & stats tells us importance (WL wiki) • See: http://tinyurl.com/3ckxg8 (in progress) • No Buildings / Floors! • We are writing • Hierarchy / devolved admin • Translate to UK English • Webauth • Groups Service interface • Bring tools in line with Bodington, new EasyWriter • Content migration code

  9. New Tools • Announcements • More question types • Site membership / user profile • User poll (vote) • Wiki (based on SnipSnap) • Mail list / archive • Tutorial sign-up sheet (2009) • Chat • Diary / course ‘blog’ • Usable forum!

  10. So what about groups? • Groups service being written by OUCS • Essential for ODIT ‘Groupware’ project • Also for Uni’s ID Management project • Will be read / write: use cases from Bodington • Will integrate with the New WebLearn service (but not Bodington)

  11. Accessibility • We are currently running trails with Disability Office • Promising comments: “Better than Bodington” • No major issues • Some small tweaks

  12. Documentation / Training • Courses will be similar to Bodington • ITLP course (starts 2009/10) • VLE team courses • Documentation: will modify existing • Tool based • Activity based • Working with Cambridge and Hull • Video tutorials • On-line (pop up) help • FAQ (see WebLearn wiki) • Look at Documentation / Help site in WebLearn Beta

  13. Data Migration • Quite a task! • Ideally users do it • Seems reasonable for MyWebLearn • Opportunity for consolidation / tidying up • Realistically we must help but manpower limited! • Pilot migration from Michaelmas 08 – initially partially manual, zip up to desktop then webDAV? • Easy: files, HTML, links, RSS • What about Questionnaires? Forum? Logbook? Deeply nested rooms? Must work out details.

  14. User Consultation • Stakeholders very important • Survey – see WebLearn wiki • Have also looked at usage stats (Wiki) • Will talk face to face • Early adopters site: • http://beta.weblearn.ox.ac.uk/portal/site/early-adopters

  15. Timeline – Key dates • Mini-pilots now • Jun 2008: Pilot year (Sakai v2.5) • Read only Groups Service • Data migration • Try out some training • Jan 2009 Production hardware starts • Jun 2009 Production service (Sakai v2.6?) • Dual service, single login • Read write Groups Service • Training starts week 8 • Data migration • Sep 2011 Bodington becomes read only

  16. Follow Progress • Via wiki – lots of material: http://wiki.oucs.ox.ac.uk/weblearn • Tasks in Jira: http://jira.oucs.ox.ac.uk/ • Overview: http://www.oucs.ox.ac.uk/ltg/vle/ • VLE news feed • LTG newsletter

  17. Fin

More Related