1 / 43

Using Assistive Technology in Behavioral Research: A Comparison of IRAP Input Methods

Using Assistive Technology in Behavioral Research: A Comparison of IRAP Input Methods . Lauren Fassero Joi Tucker Karen Kate Kellum Maureen K. Flynn Kelly G. Wilson. Detecting biases. Self-Report. Implicit Association Test. Human. Alien . Not Me. Me. Implicit Association Test.

lyndon
Download Presentation

Using Assistive Technology in Behavioral Research: A Comparison of IRAP Input Methods

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Using Assistive Technology in Behavioral Research: A Comparison of IRAP Input Methods Lauren Fassero Joi Tucker Karen Kate Kellum Maureen K. Flynn Kelly G. Wilson

  2. Detecting biases

  3. Self-Report

  4. Implicit Association Test Human Alien Not Me Me World Domination through Peace, Love, and Understanding

  5. Implicit Association Test Human Alien Not Me Me World Domination through Peace, Love, and Understanding

  6. Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure

  7. Participants Excluded

  8. Alternative Input Methods

  9. Purpose

  10. Two Studies

  11. Procedure Keyboard Informed Consent IRAP Keyboard IRAP Alternative/Switches Alternative/ Switches

  12. Stimuli

  13. Data Analysis Strategy

  14. Alt Keyboard World Domination through Peace, Love, and Understanding

  15. Alt Keyboard Participants

  16. Alt Keyboard Participants

  17. Alt Keyboard Participants

  18. Alt Keyboard Participants

  19. World Domination through Peace, Love, and Understanding

  20. Number of Participants Not Meeting Inclusion Criteria World Domination through Peace, Love, and Understanding

  21. World Domination through Peace, Love, and Understanding

  22. World Domination through Peace, Love, and Understanding

  23. % Correct on Inconsistent Trials 43% World Domination through Peace, Love, and Understanding

  24. Average Latency of Inconsistent Trials 33% World Domination through Peace, Love, and Understanding

  25. Fluency on Inconsistent Trials 67% World Domination through Peace, Love, and Understanding

  26. Less Bias 38.05% 61.95% World Domination through Peace, Love, and Understanding

  27. Switches World Domination through Peace, Love, and Understanding

  28. Switch Participants

  29. Switch Participants

  30. Switch Participants

  31. Switch Participants

  32. Number of Participants Not Meeting Inclusion Criteria World Domination through Peace, Love, and Understanding

  33. % of Participants with More Useable Trials by Input Type 95% World Domination through Peace, Love, and Understanding

  34. % Correct on Inconsistent Trials World Domination through Peace, Love, and Understanding

  35. Average Latency of Inconsistent Trials 48% 52% World Domination through Peace, Love, and Understanding

  36. Fluency on Inconsistent Trials 52% World Domination through Peace, Love, and Understanding

  37. Less Bias 61.9% World Domination through Peace, Love, and Understanding

  38. Practice Effects Example World Domination through Peace, Love, and Understanding

  39. Summary Study 1 Study 2 World Domination through Peace, Love, and Understanding

  40. Summary Study 1 Study 2 World Domination through Peace, Love, and Understanding

  41. Limitations World Domination through Peace, Love, and Understanding

  42. Future Directions and Conclusions World Domination through Peace, Love, and Understanding

  43. Using Assistive Technology in Behavioral Research: A Comparison of IRAP Input Methods Lauren Fassero Joi Tucker Karen Kate Kellum Maureen K. Flynn Kelly G. Wilson

More Related