1 / 28

Effects of Patient Race and Sex on Orthodontic Communication: A Pilot Study

Effects of Patient Race and Sex on Orthodontic Communication: A Pilot Study. S. Gajendra*, BDS, MPH, University of Illinois at Springfield, IL, USA R. Fulford, DDS,MS, A. Koerber, DDS, PhD, E. BeGole, PhD and C. Evans, DDS, DMSc, University of Illinois at Chicago, IL, USA. Introduction.

lynda
Download Presentation

Effects of Patient Race and Sex on Orthodontic Communication: A Pilot Study

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Effects of Patient Race and Sex on Orthodontic Communication: A Pilot Study S. Gajendra*, BDS, MPH, University of Illinois at Springfield, IL, USA R. Fulford, DDS,MS, A. Koerber, DDS, PhD, E. BeGole, PhD and C. Evans, DDS, DMSc, University of Illinois at Chicago, IL, USA

  2. Introduction • Effective verbal communication is an important aspect of patient treatment • Cultural competency and cross-cultural communication is important • Communication has the potential to improve compliance

  3. Objective • To explore how differences in patients’ race and sex affect how orthodontic residents communicate with patients.

  4. Literature Review • Almost $52 billion are spent in the United States on dental services each year • The Surgeon General’s Report in 2000 and Healthy People 2010 focus on reducing disparities in oral health status

  5. Literature Review • Patients care about communication (Gerbert, Bleecker and Saub (1994) • Provider variables affect racial disparities (van Ryn, 2001) • Dentist patient communication is complex • Profoundly affected by race and sex (Ong et al, 1995)

  6. Measurement of Communication • RIAS method counts utterances • Reliable and Valid (Sondell et al., 1998 & Levinson, Roter, et al., 1997) • Useful in dental setting (Sondell et al., 1998)

  7. Method • Urban Dental College, Orthodontic Department, 1/99-1/01 • STUDY SAMPLE • Sixteen orthodontic residents • Seventy new patients between the ages of 8-18 years • Eighty-two sessions recorded • Two types of sessions: records & consult

  8. Method • Audio-taping of sessions • Roter Interaction Analysis System (RIAS) used to analyze the utterances of the orthodontic residents • Inter-rater reliability 0.80 (Cohen’s kappa)

  9. Modifications of RIAS • Roter’s 40 utterance categories were modified and grouped into 20 categories • Only orthodontists’ utterances analyzed • Raters count frequency of types of utterances (utterance=phrase) • Examples: Giving Information, Encouraging, Agreeing with Patient

  10. Variables • Independent variables: • Patient race (white/non-white) • Patient gender • Records or Consult Session • Dependent Variables: • 20 types of utterances • Frequencies measured • Time, Warmth, Time Spent Talking with Others

  11. Demographic Characteristics of Sessions

  12. Residents’ Information • 6% of sessions with female residents • 4 Female Residents • 55% of sessions with non-white, mostly Asian residents • 1 African-American resident

  13. Statistical Analysis: MANOVA

  14. Significance Confirmed by Mann-Whitney Test

  15. Significant Differences in Types of Utterances Made to Whites

  16. Examples of Communication With No Race Differences

  17. Gender By Type of Session for Total Time

  18. Gender By Type of Session

  19. Gender by Session DifferencesConcern Empathy

  20. Gender by Session Differences on Gives Instructions

  21. Conclusions • The types of differences in utterances found suggest that the residents were less comfortable talking to non-white patients • Sex of the patient was also related to differences in communication.

  22. Limitations of the Study • Small sample size • Low number of orthodontists • Residents may be different from general dentists and orthodontists • Boys may have had worse malocclusal conditions than girls • More sophisticated statistical analysis needed.

  23. Strengths of the Study • New area of study in dentistry • Important issues of • Compliance • Dentist patient relationships • Provider behavior and oral health disparities

  24. Suggestions for future studies • Examine larger sample sizes of patients and dentists • More specific racial dentist-patient pairings • Examine communication and patient satisfaction & compliance

  25. Suggestions for future studies • Include other psychosocial factors such as socioeconomic status • Match subjects for age and similarity in malocclusion conditions

  26. BIBLIOGRAPHY Bartsch A, Witt E & Marks M. (English Abstract). Wirkung von Information und Kommunikation im kieferorthopadischen Beratungs-und Behandlungsgesprach. Teil II: Kommunikationsstil und Compliance. [The influence of information and communication in the orthodontic consultation and treatment visit. II. The communication style and compliance] Fortschr Kieferorthop, Jan 1995, 56(1), pp.7-15.  Cooper-Patrick, L., Gallo, J.J., Gonzales, J.J., Vu, H.T., Powe, N.R., Nelson, C. and Ford, D.E.: Race, gender and partnership in the patient-physician relationship. JAMA. 282:583-589, 1999. Gerbert, B., Bleecker, T., Saub, E. (1994, March). Dentists and the patients who love them: professional and patient views of dentistry. Journal of American Dental Association, 125, 265-274.  Hall, J. A., Irish, J. T., Roter, D. L., Ehrlich, C. M., Miller, L. H. (1994a). Gender in medical encounters: an analysis of physician and patient communication in a primary care setting. Health Psychology, 13(5), 384-92.  Levinson, W., Roter, D., Mullooly, J. P. (1997). The relationship with malpractice claims among primary care physicians and surgeons. Journal of American Medical Association. 277(7), 553-559.  Lipkin, M., Putnam, S. M., Lazare, A. (1995). The Medical interview; clinical care,education and research, New York: Springer-Verlag.  Ong, L. M., de Haes, C. J., Hoos, A. M., Lammes, F. B. (1995). Doctor-patient communication: a review of the literature. Social Science and Medicine, 40 (7), 903-18.  Roter D. (1995). The Roter Method of Interaction Process Analysis, (3rd ed.) Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health.   Roter D, Rosenbaum J, de Negri B, Renaud D, DiPrete-Brown L & Hernandez O. (1998 Mar). The effects of a continuing medical education programme in interpersonal communication skills on doctor practice and patient satisfaction in Trinidad and Tobago.Med Educ, 32(2):181-9. Nestel, D. & Betson, C. (1999). An evaluation of a communication skills workshop for dentists: Cultural and clinical relevance of the patient-centered interview. British Dental Journal, 187(7), 385-388.   Sondell, K., Soderfeldt, B., Palmquist S. (1998). A method for communication analysis in prosthodontics. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica.56(1), 48-56.   Van Ryn M. (2002 Jan). Research on the Provider Contribution to Race/Ethnicity Disparities in Medical Care. Med Care, 40(1 Supp):140-151.

More Related