1 / 5

Teacher Incentive Fund

Teacher Incentive Fund. Teacher Incentive Fund Background. 2006 to 2012: approx. $ 1.8 billion awarded for 131 TIF grants (4 cohorts) LEAs, SEAs*, non-profits* (*partnering with LEAs)

louisewhite
Download Presentation

Teacher Incentive Fund

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Teacher Incentive Fund

  2. Teacher Incentive Fund Background • 2006 to 2012: approx. $1.8 billion awarded for 131 TIF grants (4 cohorts) • LEAs, SEAs*, non-profits* (*partnering with LEAs) • Purpose: to evaluate educators based on a multiple measure evaluation system, including student growth and design a pay-for-performance bonus or compensation system that rewards effective and highly effective teachers • 2010 and 2012 the grants included career ladder options

  3. Teacher Incentive Fund History 33 Teacher Incentive Fund (TIF) grantees in first two cohorts: • Cohort 1 (2006) = 15; Cohort 2 (2007) = 18. Cohort 3 (2010): • Competition held under a new NFP. • FY10 allocation $303,829,939, ARRA allocation $143,677,651. • Two Competitions: Main and Evaluation. • 51 main TIF grantees and 11 evaluation TIF grantees. Cohort 4 (2012): • Competition held under a new NFP. • FY12 allocation: $299,443,000 • Two Competitions: General and STEM • 29 General TIF grantees and 6 STEM TIF grantees.

  4. TIF 4 Guiding Principles • Improve teacher and principal effectiveness by • attracting and retaining effective educators. • Improving professional development and support for educators • Increase sustainability and impactby embedding performance-based compensation systems (PBCS) into LEA-wide human capital management systems (HCMS). • Increase flexibility to tailor PBCS to local context. • Improve the effectiveness of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) teaching and learning.

  5. 37 States Served by TIF 1-4 Funds* * Fiscal agents are not necessarily based in the states they serve.

More Related