1 / 35

SiGe BiCMOS 65-GHz BPSK Transmitter and 30 to 122 GHz LC-Varactor VCOs with up to 21% Tuning Range

SiGe BiCMOS 65-GHz BPSK Transmitter and 30 to 122 GHz LC-Varactor VCOs with up to 21% Tuning Range. Chihou Lee, Terry Yao, Alain Mangan, Kenneth Yau, Miles Copeland*, Sorin Voinigescu University of Toronto - Edward S. Rogers, Sr. Dept. of Electrical & Computer Engineering

lotus
Download Presentation

SiGe BiCMOS 65-GHz BPSK Transmitter and 30 to 122 GHz LC-Varactor VCOs with up to 21% Tuning Range

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. SiGe BiCMOS 65-GHz BPSK Transmitter and 30 to 122 GHz LC-Varactor VCOs with up to 21% Tuning Range Chihou Lee, Terry Yao, Alain Mangan, Kenneth Yau, Miles Copeland*, Sorin Voinigescu University of Toronto - Edward S. Rogers, Sr. Dept. of Electrical & Computer Engineering * Professor Emeritus, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

  2. Motivation VCO and BPSK transmitter circuit topologies Design methodology for lowest phase noise VCOs Experimental results Conclusions Outline

  3. Advanced communications (60-GHz radio) and radar systems (77-GHz cruise control). Investigate a systematic VCO design methodology focused on lowest phase noise. Motivation

  4. Motivation VCO and BPSK transmitter circuit topologies Design methodology for lowest phase noise VCOs Experimental results Conclusions Outline

  5. Fundamental Mode VCO Topology • Differential Colpitts Configuration • C2 implemented as accumulation-mode nMOS varactor. • Cascode for improved isolation of output from resonant tank, and power gain. • LEE & Resistive tail bias with low-pass filter to reduce bias circuit’s noise contribution.

  6. Push-Push VCO Topology • Active and passive components operate at ½ output frequency • Similar topology as fundamental-mode VCO except output is taken at Q2 & Q4’s base. • Intrinsically isolated output. • Allows differential tuning (VTUNE+POS, VTUNE,-NEG).

  7. 35-GHz VCO (Fund.) VCO Schematics 70-GHz VCO (Push-Push)

  8. BPSK Transmitter Schematic

  9. Motivation VCO and BPSK transmitter circuit topologies Design methodology for lowest phase noise VCOs Experimental results Conclusions Outline

  10. VCO Design Parameters: VTANK – tank voltage swing QTANK – tank quality factor JBIAS – current density C1:C2 – capacitance ratio LB – base inductance IBIAS – bias current Designing for Lowest Phase Noise Simulation Test Circuit

  11. 1. Optimum C1:C2 Ratio

  12. 2. Optimum Current Density (JBIAS) OPTIMUM JBIAS OPTIMUM JBIAS = optimum noise current density (Jopt) of cascode.

  13. 3. Optimum Bias Current (IBIAS)

  14. 3. Optimum Base Inductance (LB) Smallest LB results in Lowest Phase Noise

  15. Maximize quality factor (Q) of resonant tank. Bias transistors at optimum noise current density Jopt. VCO Design Methodology Show a simulated plot of Jopt @ 40 GHz & fT, fMAX for cascoded transistor configuration

  16. Choose smallest reproducible base inductance (LB). VCO Design Methodology (con’t) • Sweep IBIAS to minimize phase noise while choosing C1:C2 ratio to maximize VTANK while maintaining fosc. • Add inductive emitter degeneration LE. • [Li and Rein, JSSC 2003]

  17. 13 VCOs & Oscillators fabricated to examine the impact on phase noise of: Base inductance (LB) Accumulation-mode nMOS varactors versus. MIM capacitors Addition of LE Operation on 2nd harmonic versus. operation on fundamental. VCO Design Space Examined

  18. Motivation VCO and BPSK transmitter circuit topologies Design methodology for lowest phase noise VCOs Experimental results Conclusions Outline

  19. Jazz Semiconductor’s commercial SBC18 0.18 m BiCMOS process. Fabrication Technology • Peak fT and fMAX near 155 GHz. NFmin extracted from measured y-parameters [S. P. Voinigescu, et. al, JSSC 1997]

  20. Varactor Q Characteristics

  21. Family of 13 VCOs: Microphotographs Fundamental-Mode: (8) 35 GHz, (2) 60 GHz, Push-Push: (1) 70 GHz, (2) 120-GHz

  22. 65-GHz BPSK transmitter Microphotographs (con’t)

  23. Averaged Spectral Plots for 35-GHz VCO (LB = 100 pH, with LE): 35-GHz VCO Measurements (A) VCO (B) Fixed Freq. Oscillator

  24. Tuning and Output Power Characteristics: 35-GHz VCO Measurements (con’t)

  25. Lowest Phase Noise Design Space Impact of: 1. Base Inductance 2. Inductive Emitter Degeneration (LE)

  26. Averaged Spectral Plots: 60-GHz VCO Measurements (A) VCO (B) Fixed Freq. Oscillator

  27. Measurements over Temperature: 60-GHz VCO Measurements (con’t)

  28. Spectral Plots: Push-Push VCO Measurements • 70-GHz VCO • POUT > -14 dBm (b) 120-GHz VCO POUT > -30 dBm

  29. Tuning Characteristics: Push-Push VCO Measurements (con’t)

  30. *FOM = L{foffset} - 20log(fosc/foffset) + 10log(PDC/POUT) pp = push-push VCO Si-Based mm-wave VCO Comparison

  31. With DATA (231-1 PRBS): BPSK Transmitter Measurements No DATA:

  32. BPSK Transmitter Meas. (con’t) With DATA (27-1 PRBS pattern):

  33. Motivation VCO and BPSK transmitter circuit topologies Design methodology for lowest phase noise VCOs Experimental results Conclusions Outline

  34. Presented, with experimental validation, a systematic VCO design methodology for lowest phase noise. Compared to a MIM capacitor, accumulation-mode nMOS varactors degrades phase noise by 1-2 dB. Inductive degeneration lowers phase noise by 3-4 dB. Operation on 2nd harmonic increases tuning range by 50% - at expense of lower POUT First 65-GHz BPSK transmitter. Conclusions

  35. Jazz Semiconductor, Gennum Corporation. Canadian Foundation for Innovation, Micronet, Canadian Microelectronics Corporation, NSERC. Marco Racanelli and Paul Kempf. Acknowledgements

More Related