180 likes | 300 Views
The Czech and Slovak experience with the World Bank's program of CPFL Benefits and added value for the national regulators. Tom as Prouza former Deputy Minister of Finance, Czech Republic September 26 , 2011. Today's agenda. why is CPFL an issue for a middle-income EU country?
E N D
The Czech and Slovak experience with the World Bank's program of CPFLBenefits and added value for the national regulators Tomas Prouza former Deputy Minister of Finance, Czech Republic September 26, 2011
Today's agenda • why is CPFL an issue for a middle-income EU country? • why seek assistence from the World Bank? • WB impact in the Czech Republic • WB impact in Slovakia • key lessons
About me • originally a finance journalist, established the first personal finance website in 2000 • deputy minister of finance 2004-2007 • 2007-2011 member of the board of an IFA company • 2009-2011 chairman of the Czech IFA Association
Setting the scene • 2004: 15 years after the fall of communism • institutional clean-up in 1990's • financial institutions owned by foreign conglomerates • all modern products available • limited customer experience
Setting the scene II • life insurance, partly investment & mortgage intermediation dominated by multi-level agents • fragmented market supervision • centralized supervisor since 2006 (central bank) believes in prudential supervision only • self-regulation works sporadically • growing number of complaints from the public (high prices & misselling)
Political options • price regulation – easy & popular • focus on real solutions even if they take time • transparency (know what you pay) • comparability (choose the best easily) • migration (lower switching barriers) • understanding & education (know what you do and why) • redress (easy-to-use and quick recourse mechanism)
Key objections • no need to change (surveys, price comparisons, foreign experience) • let the market work (old tricks, new players) • only prudential supervision matters • education is enough • how do you know your ideas will work?
Assistance needed • around 2005 no international work on CP (EU directives primarily deal with market stability and single market, OECD only starts to look at financial education) • closest international work WB corporate governance reviews • in 2005, the Czech Republic asked for technical assistence on CPFL review, followed by Slovakia • first reviews conducted under ECA Vice-President Shigeo Katsu, Daniela Gressani, then the Country Director for Central Europe and the Baltic States, by Sue Rutledge and her team
CZ expectations • government expectations from the WB: • stimulate public debate and provide support • provide specific advice on: • financial education and financial literacy • alternative dispute resolution mechanism • distribution of financial products (including disclosure and regulation)
CZ impact I • multi-stakeholder communication platform set up (MinFin, MIT, MinEdu, integrated supervisor, industry & consumer representatives) • consumer protection made an integral part of the mandate of the integrated supervisor (limited powers and partial coverage remain a problem, becoming more pro-active)
CZ impact II • financial education – official Financial Education Stratregy prepared and approved by the government, key priorities: • active behavior on the financial market • prevention of overindebtedness • preparation for old age • financial education strategy for high schools • working group established to coordinate
CZ impact III • dispute resolution mechanism – public consultation based on WB's recommendations, powers consequently extended but financing worsened • overhaul of distribution rules prepared (3 year discussion) • if approved, should limit room for misselling • should have started with disclosure
SK expectations • support the MinFin as the single financial market regulator • consumer protection in financial services one of the priorities of the new Slovak government (2006) • three areas of interest: • dislosure and advertising rules + ADR • financial education • distribution and financial advice
SK impact I • new laws drafted based on WB recommendations: • Act on intermediation and advisory in the financial market, setting up new training & certification system, remuneration and responsibility for distributors - approved • Act on financial consumer protection setting up the new Financial Consumer Protection Office, responsible for complaints resolution, market conduct supervision and financial education (incl. education and certification of distributors) – cancelled by the 2010 Slovak government
SK impact II • dispute resulution – the 2007 WB Technical Note provided recommendations to improve the ADR system and public access • voluntary Banking Ombud established • government proposed Financial Ombud – cancelled by the 2010 Slovak government • consumer credit disclosure – publication of average APR, maximum APR set
Key lessons I • strong benchmarks needed • cross-sectoral issues become more urgent (same rules for similar products, ADR, etc.) • keeping up the pressure needed (impact studies, action plans and implementation verification, repeated financial literacy studies to monitor developments)
Key lessons II • education of national authorities needed: • publish case studies and recommendations / best practices • promote discussion of key issues • leverage the knowledge of the CPFL team • compare CPFL policies across countries, promote examples to support competition
Thank you for your attention Tomas Prouza, MBA tomas@prouza.cz