district evaluation advisory committee office of accountability n.
Download
Skip this Video
Download Presentation
District Evaluation Advisory Committee Office of Accountability

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 44

District Evaluation Advisory Committee Office of Accountability - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 152 Views
  • Uploaded on

District Evaluation Advisory Committee Office of Accountability. Ms. Brenda Patterson, Chief Accountability Officer Mr. Sham Bacchus, Interim Executive Director Dr. Burnie Bristow, Interim Director Dr. Vanessa Serrano, Interim Supervisor Tammy Williams, Program Coordinator

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'District Evaluation Advisory Committee Office of Accountability' - leonard-whitehead


Download Now An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
district evaluation advisory committee office of accountability

District Evaluation Advisory CommitteeOffice of Accountability

Ms. Brenda Patterson, Chief Accountability Officer

Mr. Sham Bacchus, Interim Executive Director

Dr. Burnie Bristow, Interim Director

Dr. Vanessa Serrano, Interim Supervisor

Tammy Williams, Program Coordinator

Evelyn McLeod, Confidential Secretary

DEAC Meeting-April 23, 2013-Dr. Burnie Bristow

welcome district evaluation advisory committee

Welcome District EvaluationAdvisory Committee

DEAC Meeting-April 23, 2013-Dr. Burnie Bristow

slide3

AGENDA

  • Office of Accountability
  • DEAC Committee Meeting
  • April 23, 2013 Facilitator: Dr. Burnie Bristow, NBCT
  • 90 Delaware Avenue Cafeteria, 2:30-4:30 pm
  • Thoroughly Trained
  • 2:30-2:40 Meet and Greet
  • 2:40-2:50 Revisit Roles and Responsibilities of the DEAC Committee
  • 2:50-3:05 Steering Committee Updates
  • Sub-Committee
  • Student Information System
  • 3:05 AchieveNJUpdates
  • 3:05-3:20 Non-Tested Grades and Subjects
        • Developing Student Growth Objectives (Teacher Focus)
  • 3:20-3:35 Tested Grades and Subjects
        • Student Growth Percentiles (Teacher Focus)
        • Developing Student Growth Objectives (Teacher Focus)
  • 3:35-3:40 Summer Professional Development Opportunities for Teachers
  • 3:40-4:00 Exemplary Teacher Training
  • -Dave Roudebush, Ph.D., Curriculum Focal Point
  • 4:00-4:25 How will the Paterson Public School District define “THOROUGHLY TRAINED”?
  • 4:25-4:30 Action Items:
  • Next steps
  • Deliverables
  • Next meeting date

DEAC Meeting-April 23, 2013-Dr. Burnie Bristow

slide4

Roles and Responsibilities of the DEAC Committee The DEAC committee (formed Dec. 2011) functions as an advisor to the Paterson Public Schools in the implementation of the TEACH NJ Act.  Embedded in the TEACHNJ Act is a requirement to revise the Principal and Teacher Evaluation System.  Membership on the DEAC Committee provides an opportunity for committee members toprovide feedback on the performance rubrics, program development and implementation at the school and community level.  The DEAC committee is comprised of teachers, principals, central office staff, school board members and parents.

DEAC Meeting-April 23, 2013-Dr. Burnie Bristow

slide5

Teacher Effectiveness and Accountability for the Children of New Jersey (TEACHNJ) Act.”

The goal of this legislation is to raise student achievement by improving instruction through the adoption of evaluations that provide specific feedback to educators, inform the provision of aligned professional development, and inform personnel decisions;

DEAC Meeting-April 23, 2013-Dr. Burnie Bristow

cross departmental steering committee

Cross-Departmental Steering Committee

Update on the Student Information System

Sham Bacchus

DEAC Meeting-April 23, 2013-Dr. Burnie Bristow

slide7

Current Data Sources/Systems that directly impact new Evaluation Instrument

Currently requires human input from schools and central office. (Error Laden) - 17

Currently gets data from other systems. (Preferred) - 5

Brenda Patterson, Chief Accountability Officer, PPS

slide8

Data Integration

There was a need for an internal review of the programs, processes and technical components required to effectively support the implementation of the new Principal and Teacher Evaluation. This review of our infrastructure necessitated a cross departmental collaboration to integrate various systems.

DEAC Meeting-April 23, 2013-Dr. Burnie Bristow

slide9

Communications, Business, HR Assessment, MIS, Technology

  • Merging platform ALIO and MIS
  • Support to assessment
  • Develop data platform to record and keep track of teacher and school achievement data
  • Teacher E-board / blog /Dropbox

Collaborative Teams as Decision Makers:

Communications/Technology/MIS,

Business,

Reform - Assessment/HR/PD,

C & I,

Special Programs and Accountability

charlotte mecklenburg slo study
Charlotte –Mecklenburg SLO study

Key findings:

  • The higher the quality of the SLO, the more likely it is to be attained
  • The quality of SLOs increases significantly in just two years
  • Students whose teachers had higher quality SLOs achieve higher scores on math and ELA tests
  • Students whose teachers met their SLOs achieve higher scores on math and ELA tests
charlotte mecklenburg slo study1
Charlotte –Mecklenburg SLO study

What principals said about SLOs

“The way of doing business in the school is the SLO process. It adds to the spirit of cooperation.”

“Developing SLOs forces teachers to target low performing kids and then work harder to pull those kids up.”

“We have moved from a priority school to a high growth school, and I give a lot of credit for this change to the SLO process.”

charlotte mecklenburg slo study2
Charlotte –Mecklenburg SLO study

What mattered most in the SLO process

  • Analyze student baseline data, for use in planning and teaching
  • Set individual student growth targets, for both more informative and accurate assessment of student learning
  • Participate in collegial collaboration in the development of SLOs
shift in practice

Shift in Practice

Student Growth Objectives

DEAC Meeting-April 23, 2013-Dr. Burnie Bristow

Brenda Patterson, Chief Accountability Officer, PPS

what is an sgo
What is an SGO?
  • A Student Growth Objective is a long-term academic goal that teachers set for groups of students and must be:
  • Specific and measureable
  • Aligned to New Jersey’s curriculum standards
  • Based on available prior student learning data
  • A measure of student learning between two points in time
  • Ambitious and achievable

Page 3

slide16

NTGS 101: Student Growth Objective Overview

Different types of Student Growth Objectives: Student Growth Objectives can take many different forms

17

slide17

NTGS 101: Specific Student Growth Objective

Specific Objective: Examples

The word “specific objective” would likely be used to identify anything that does not cover your general population or is not a cumulative test

18

sgos in achieve nj requirements
SGOs in Achieve NJ - requirements
  • A teacher develops SGOs in consultation with his or her principal.
  • All teachers who receive an SGP score must set between 1 and 2 SGOs.
  • Teachers who do not receive an SGP score must set 2 SGOs.
  • SGOs must be aligned to NJCCCS or CCSS and measure student achievement and/or growth.
  • SGOs must be specific and measurable and based on available student learning data.
slide19

NTGS 101: Pilot Districts

Student Achievement Goals (SAGs): Pilot Districts were given the recommendation to use SAGs for the 2012 – 2013 school year

DEAC Meeting-April 23, 2013-Dr. Burnie Bristow

slide20

NTGS 101: SGO – a high school biology example

SGO Components: General Timeline

August

November

slide21

NTGS 101: SGO – a high school biology example

SGO Components: General Timeline

January

June

slide22

Teacher Evaluation: Summative Rating Timeline

  • At summative conference, all available component scores (i.e. teacher practice, SGO results) will be discussed.
  • SGP data will be available on the following timeline.

Teacher Practice

Student Growth Percentile

Student Growth Objective

Sum. Rating

5 steps
5 Steps
  • Step 1: Choose or develop a quality assessment aligned to NJCCCS or CCSS.
  • Step 2: Determine students’ starting points.
  • Step 3: Set ambitious and achievable SGOs with the approval of the principal/supervisor.
  • Step 4: Track progress, refine instruction.
  • Step 5: Review results and score in consultation with your principal/supervisor.

Page 8 – Quick Start Guide

slide25

Develop assessments collaboratively.

  • Align all assessments with NJCCCS or CCSS.
  • Align all assessments with district, school and department goals.
  • Make sure all the content in your SGO is covered in the assessment.
  • Incorporate test items that vary in levels of difficulty.
  • Include a sufficient number of test items to ensure rigor.
  • Collaboratively determine possible modifications to meet the needs of students.
  • Develop rubrics to assess essay responses.
  • Make sure content- and skill-based rubrics are specific and address multiple levels of proficiency.

Page 11

sgo guidebook development
SGO Guidebook Development

Continuous improvement with information from the field

  • Modification and addition of forms
  • Clarity of language
  • Models of SGOs
  • More guidance on assessments, including portfolios
principal and teacher evaluation system training discussion

Principal and Teacher Evaluation System Training Discussion

Dr. Dave Roudebush, Focal Point

April 23, 2013

teacher evaluation system
Teacher Evaluation System
  • Performance Standard #1: Preparation for Instruction
    • Establishing a culture of high expectations for learning and achievement
    • Uses district adopted curriculum and content knowledge to design coherent lessons
    • Post aligned lesson objectives and plan for demonstration of learning
teacher evaluation system1
Teacher Evaluation System
  • Performance Standard #2: Use of Data to Inform Instruction
    • Focus on improving instruction using data
    • Use a variety of assessment methods when designing classroom assessments
    • Involve students in assessing their own learning
teacher evaluation system2
Teacher Evaluation System
  • Performance Standard #3: Delivers Quality Instruction
    • Instruct bell to bell
    • Use a variety of instructional strategies to focus instruction
    • Engages students in learning
    • Continually checks for understanding
    • Deliver rigorous and relevant content
    • Integrate 21st Century Skills in instruction
    • Provides feedback about student proficiency
teacher evaluation system3
Teacher Evaluation System
  • Performance Standard #4: Interventions to Meet Diverse Needs
    • Differentiate instruction based on student needs and background
    • Implements interventions with fidelity and adjusts interventions based on results
    • Adapt and modify instruction for the unique needs of learners
teacher evaluation system4
Teacher Evaluation System
  • Performance Standard #5: Classroom Environment
    • Contribute to a safe and orderly learning environment
    • Use effective classroom management procedures
    • Effectively manage student behavior
    • Foster collaboration and self-regulation in students
    • Promote positive and respectful rapport
teacher evaluation system5
Teacher Evaluation System
  • Performance Standard #6: Leadership
    • Understand their role and responsibility for professional growth and positive leadership
    • Promote the concept of Professional Learning Communities through collaboration and purposeful involvement
    • Continue professional growth
teacher evaluation system6
Teacher Evaluation System
  • Performance Standard #7: Professional Responsibilities
    • Adhere to Federal laws, state statutes and regulation pertaining to education, Board of Education policies, Memoranda of Understanding and school rules
    • Demonstrates professionalism
    • Effectively communicates and solves problems
teacher evaluation system professional development opportunities
Teacher Evaluation SystemProfessional Development Opportunities
  • Two Major Professional Development Strands
    • Curriculum Alignment/Instructional Strategies
    • The Teacher Evaluation Performance Rubric
professional development opportunities
Professional Development Opportunities
  • Aug. 18-19, 2011 * Aug. 25-27, 2011
  • Sep. 19-21, 2011 * Oct. 8, 2011
  • Aug. 21-30, 2012 * Sep. 4-5, 2012
  • Oct. 12, 2012 * Feb. 15, 2013

To Date 2,300 teachers have been trained

Approximately 202 teachers need to be trained

slide42

Thoroughly Train Teachers:

Stop.

Reflect and Discuss:

Think about what you have seen presented here,

How will the Paterson Public School District define “THOROUGHLY TRAINED”?

Please write down and discuss your thoughts and ideas at your table. Please be prepared to share your most salient ideas with the committee.

DEAC Meeting-April 23, 2013-Dr. Burnie Bristow

slide43

Next Steps

DEAC Meeting-April 23, 2013-Dr. Burnie Bristow

slide44

THANK-YOU

DEAC Meeting-April 23, 2013-Dr. Burnie Bristow