1 / 16

Lucy A. Savitz , Ph.D., MBA Director, Research and Education

Patient Engagement in Design, Delivery, & Discovery 8 th Annual Utah Health Services Research Conference February 25, 2013. Lucy A. Savitz , Ph.D., MBA Director, Research and Education Institute for Healthcare Delivery Research Intermountain Healthcare

leola
Download Presentation

Lucy A. Savitz , Ph.D., MBA Director, Research and Education

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Patient Engagement in Design, Delivery, & Discovery8th Annual Utah Health Services Research ConferenceFebruary 25, 2013 Lucy A. Savitz, Ph.D., MBA Director, Research and Education Institute for Healthcare Delivery Research Intermountain Healthcare Research Professor, Epidemiology Division, Internal Medicine Director, Community Engagement Core, CCTS University of Utah

  2. Susan Dentzer,, Editor-in-Chief, Health Affairs, 32(2): 202. The ‘blockbuster drug of the century’ revealed in this issue!

  3. The ‘drug’ is actually a concept…

  4. The ‘drug’ is actually a concept… • Patient activation & engagement

  5. Many ways to define the concept… • Patient engagement: actions that people take for their health and to benefit from care (IHI) • Patient activation: understanding one’s own role in the care process and having the knowledge, skills, and confidence to take on that role (Hibbard et al.)

  6. Shared Decision Making • Intended to improve patient knowledge & involvement in decision-making to promote an informed, value-based choice among 2 or more medically reasonable alternatives(O’Connor et al.)

  7. Patient Engagement in Knowledge & Involvement about Care Shared Patient Decision Activation Making |______________________________| Savitz, LA

  8. Holistic View of Patient Engagement • More holistic definitions broaden the concept further to encompass care delivery, design & research/discovery • Patients as partners • Personal responsibility & self-management • Quality improvement • (< 1/3 patients involved patient-centered medical home QI) • Care design • (e.g., mobile apps) • Governance

  9. Carman, Dardess, Maurer, Sofaer, Adams, Bechtel, Sweeney, page 225

  10. CMMI & Hospital Engagement Network Assessment of Engagement • Prior to admission, hospital staff provides and discusses a discharge planning checklist with every patient that has a scheduled admission, allowing questions or comments from the patient or family. • Hospitals conduct both shift change huddles for staff & do bedside reporting with patients & family members in all feasible cases. • Hospital has a dedicated person or functional area that is proactively responsible for Patient and Family Engagement and systematically evaluates engagement activities. • Hospital has an active Patient and Family Engagement Committee OR at least one former patient that serves on a patient safety or quality improvement committee or team. • Hospital has one or more patient(s) who serve on a Governing and/or Leadership Board serving as a patient representative.

  11. Provisional Results, Intermountain-led HEN 2-13

  12. Patient engagement is one strategy to achieve the "triple aim” • A growing body of evidence demonstrates that patients who are more actively involved in their health care experience • better health outcomes • Improved satisfaction • lower cost

  13. What Will It Take to Move from Here to There: Design, Delivery, or Discovery • Need for training • Physicians • Clinical and non-clinical staff • Patients, families, caregivers • It takes a team-based approach • Culture change • Common language • Viewing patients/caregivers as partners • Evidence that engagement makes a difference

  14. Some HSR Challenges • Engagement as anew approach to research • Limited/lacking tools to capture engagement • More research needed to understand: • How engagement leads to improved outcomes • Where engagement is best placed (setting, timing) • What should be offered • nudging vs. balanced, nondirective decision aids • Ways to engage all patients (literacy) • Ethical implications of engagement • abandonment or penalties for non-adherent patients

  15. Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) • www.pcori.org • ACA mandates that PCORI seek meaningful ways to integrate the patient’s voice into the research process • Generate topics for research • Help to prioritize topics • Select topics for funding • Ensure patient involvement in design

  16. Local Resources • Community Engagement Core of the Center for Clinical and Translation Services (CCTS) • Patient Centered Outcomes /Comparative Effectiveness Research Certificate Program • Patient Centered Outcomes Research Class, University of Utah School of Medicine, offered First Summer Session Annually

More Related