1 / 23

Presentation to the State Board of Education March 13, 2012 Stan W. Heffner

Presentation to the State Board of Education March 13, 2012 Stan W. Heffner State Superintendent of Public Instruction. No Child Left Behind (2001). Yet to be reauthorized States are encouraged to present innovative reforms Waiver offers flexibility from rules in exchange for:

Download Presentation

Presentation to the State Board of Education March 13, 2012 Stan W. Heffner

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Presentation to the State Board of Education March 13, 2012 Stan W. Heffner State Superintendent of Public Instruction

  2. No Child Left Behind (2001) Yet to be reauthorized States are encouraged to present innovative reforms Waiver offers flexibility from rules in exchange for: • Higher student achievement, and • Greater school accountability 11 states now have approved waivers

  3. Without the Waiver Estimated that 90% of Ohio’s LEAs will not meet AYP

  4. Key Elements of Proposal

  5. AYP Replacement AYP calls for 100% proficiency for everyone by 2014-2015: not realistic New goals: • Implement more rigorous learning standards • Cut achievement gaps by half over six years

  6. Reforming SES Greater quality controls for schools for selecting providers

  7. Targeted Assistance for Low-Performing Schools New designations: • Priority: Lowest performing 5%, in addition to SIG schools • Focus: At least 10% of schools with the largest subgroup achievement gap and graduation gap and not making progress.

  8. Cut Red Tape Schools freed from some reporting requirements Greater flexibility in use of federal funds

  9. Eliminate Current Rating System

  10. Eliminate Current Rating System Pending Legislative Action

  11. Letter Grade Ratings Letter grades in four areas: • Student performance (Performance Index) • Student progress (Value-Added) • School/District performance (Percent of indicators met) • Gap closing (AYP) Overall average grade Changes will affect 2011-2012 report card, pending legislative action

  12. Letter Grade Rating Scale

  13. Letter Grade Ratings

  14. Letter Grade Ratings

  15. Letter Grade Ratings

  16. Letter Grade Ratings

  17. Letter Grade Ratings

  18. Are You Ready?

  19. 2011 Letter Grade Ratings

  20. Timeline Waiver decision in a few months Changes would begin in the 2012-2013 school year 2011-2012 school year report cards will reflect changes, pending legislative action

  21. Questions

More Related