1 / 3

EASC Progress Report

This report outlines the progress made by the Environmental Assessment Sponsor Committee led by Holly Elwood and Wayne Rifer as of May 7, 2012. Key highlights include the approval of four PARs and the balloting of standards 1680.2 and 1680.3 related to imaging equipment and televisions. The committee has actively participated with around 400 stakeholders across working groups, successfully addressing various management and process improvements. The report emphasizes the importance of obtaining diverse stakeholder approval to advance environmental standards and enhance organizational efficiency.

landis
Download Presentation

EASC Progress Report

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. EASC Progress Report Holly Elwood and Wayne Rifer Environmental Assessment Sponsor Committee 5/7/12

  2. EASC Activity Summary • Current working groups: • 1680.2 Standard for the Environmental Assessment of Imaging Equipment • 1680.3 Standard for the Environmental Assessment of Televisions • Average Working Group size: 100 (400 total participation in both working groups and all subgroups) • Number of PARs approved YTD: 4 (we didn’t approve all these this year). • Number of Stds sent to ballot: 2 on May 2011 • Number of Stds approved for publication: Hoping for 2 by End of Year

  3. Highlights of this Reporting Period • Sent 1680.2 and 1680.3 out for balloting • With a widely diverse group of stakeholders and great contention over environmental requirements, getting the required 75% approval to go to ballot was a major feat. • Completed improvements of our management structure and processes • Completed improved Sponsor and Working Group P and Ps • Completed intensive stakeholder review of our standards development process to address concerns about length of process and process rules • Reviewed processes used by other SDOs • Revised EASC membership and added two new members

More Related