1 / 7

Blake & McAuliffe (2011)

Blake & McAuliffe (2011). Find your Group #, and answer the associated questions. For this activity:. You should record your answers as a group Only answer the questions assigned to your group # Be prepared to share your answers with the class. Group 1: Introduction.

laasya
Download Presentation

Blake & McAuliffe (2011)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Blake & McAuliffe (2011) Find your Group #, and answer the associated questions

  2. For this activity: • You should record your answers as a group • Only answer the questions assigned to your group # • Be prepared to share your answers with the class

  3. Group 1: Introduction • 1) What does this experiment aim to investigate? • 2) What is new about this experiment’s design, that is not found in past studies? • 3) What predictions were made about participants’ responses to disadvantageous inequity (DI) and advantageous inequity (AI)?

  4. Group 2: Method • 1) What ages were the participants, and were they familiar to one another? • 2) Describe the experience of a participant who plays the “decider” during the procedure • A) if they were in the DI condition, and then • B) if they were in the AI condition. Include a description of how the apparatus works. • 3) How was reaction time measured?

  5. Group 3: Results • 1) In one sentence, how did age relate to rejections of DI trials? (See section 2.2.1.) • i.e., when the decider had 1 candy and the other child had 4, did the decider’s age influence whether or not that trial was rejected? • 2) In one sentence, how did age relate to rejections of AI trials? (See 2.2.2.) • When the decider had 4, and the other child had 1

  6. Group 4: Results • 1) What major difference was noted between 8-year-olds and younger children, when considering aversion to inequity? (See section 2.2.3.) • 2) Regarding reaction time, do eight-year-olds differ from younger children when deciding to accept or reject inequity? (See 2.2.4.)

  7. Group 5: Discussion • 1) The authors state that this experiment provides three new contributions to this field of study. What are these three contributions? • 2) According to the authors, is our aversion to inequity based on biological mechanisms, social mechanisms, or both? Explain.

More Related