1 / 30

Dr Bryan Maguire IADT

Implementing the National Framework of Qualifications, 24 & 25 February, 2005, Galway The Framework and the Bologna Process . Dr Bryan Maguire IADT. The Qualifications Act and the International Dimension.

kylar
Download Presentation

Dr Bryan Maguire IADT

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Implementing the National Framework of Qualifications, 24 & 25 February, 2005, GalwayThe Framework and the Bologna Process Dr Bryan Maguire IADT

  2. The Qualifications Act and the International Dimension “The Authority … shall … inform itself of practices outside the State in respect of matters relevant to its functions”

  3. Bologna in the development of the National Framework • “The Authority will be aware and informed of international developments, and will establish linkages to all relevant external systems. … These include the Bologna Process for higher education and the emerging broad understanding of some award-types in that regard” • Policies and criteria for the National Framework of Qualifications, April 2002

  4. International consultation in framework development - I • International participation in consultation conference (Feb 2002) • Authority (& HETAC) participation in Joint Quality Initiative (2001-2005) • Frameworks of qualifications: A review of development s outside of the State • Working Paper, June 2002

  5. International consultation in framework development - II • Bilateral consultations, particularly with neighbouring jurisdictions • Participation in the Irish Bologna Steering Group

  6. Developments in Higher Education in Europe • 1988 Magna Charta Universitatum • 1998 Sorbonne Declaration: Harmonisation of the architecture of the European Higher Education System • 1999 Bologna Declaration: European Area of Higher Education, to be achieved by 2010

  7. Bologna Declaration • Not an international treaty; not an EU instrument • A commitment by European countries to reform their higher education systems to achieve convergence • Goal: a European Area of Higher Education • Action plan: the Bologna “process”

  8. Bologna Process I • Prague Communiqué, June 2001 • Berlin Communiqué, Sept 2003 • Bergen Meeting, May 2005 • Seminars, conferences, national committees and reports • Tuning Project (EUA), Joint Quality Initiative, Quality Assurance (ENQA) • http://www.bologna-bergen2005.no/

  9. Bologna Process II • Easily readable and comparable degrees; Diploma Supplement • System of Credits: building on ECTS • Promotion of mobility • European dimension • Quality assurance • Curricular / Institutional co-operation

  10. Copenhagen (March 2003) • Bologna Seminar on Qualification Structures in European HE • Irish keynote address • Recommended national frameworks and an overarching framework

  11. Berlin September 2003 • Ministers encourage the member states to elaborate a framework of comparable and compatible qualifications for their higher education systems, which should seek to describe qualifications in terms of workload, level, learning outcomes, competences and profile. • They also undertake to elaborate an overarching framework of qualifications for the European Higher Education Area.

  12. Framework for Qualifications of the EHEA - status • Developed by working group, with expert consultants, in 2004-05 in response to request of the ministers at Berlin • Endorsed by Seminar in Copenhagen in January 2005 • Currently under consideration by the Bologna Follow-up Group for recommendation to the ministers at Bergen in May 2005

  13. Principles • Qualifications are a matter of national policy and law • Framework for the EHEA is an overarching “framework of frameworks” • EHEA framework will not cover all the features required in national frameworks

  14. Purpose of EHEA framework • International transparency • International recognition • International mobility • Assist in identifying points of articulation between national frameworks

  15. EHEA Framework • Three main cycles (& short cycle) • Short cycle (within or linked to first cycle) • First cycle • Second cycle • Third cycle

  16. Learning outcomes • Key conceptual development • Descriptors of learning outcomes, including competences • Generic end-of-cycle outcomes

  17. Dublin Descriptors • knowledge and understanding; • applying knowledge and understanding; • making judgements; • communications skills; • learning skills.

  18. Credits • European credit transfer system guidelines • 60 credits = one year FTE • All awards should be linked to ECTS • Detailed credit arrangements a national matter

  19. ECTS • Short cycle (within or linked to first cycle) • 120 approx • First cycle • 180-240 • Second cycle • Min 60, normally 90-120 • Third cycle • Usually not credit bearing

  20. Linking frameworksNational => European • Criteria • Procedures for self-certification

  21. Criteria for national frameworks • Ministerial designation • Based on learning outcomes • Bologna-compatible QA arrangements • Diploma supplement referenced • Qualifications linked to descriptors • Published responsibilities

  22. Procedures • Self-certification by competent authority • Process evidence published • Relevant national QA agreement • International dimension to certification process • ENIC/NARIC maintain listing of the self-certified • Diploma supplement note

  23. Diploma supplement • Description of what student has achieved • Expected for 2005 - Ireland • Implementation linked to student information systems • http://europass.cedefop.eu.int/

  24. Quality Assurance • European Network of Quality Assurance Organisations (ENQA) & EUA, EURASHE, ESIB • Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area • Report February 2005 to BFUG

  25. ENQA report - I • There will be European standards for internal and external quality assurance, and for external quality assurance agencies. • European quality assurance agencies will be expected to submit themselves to a cyclical review within five years. • There will be an emphasis on subsidiarity, with reviews being undertaken nationally where possible.

  26. ENQA report - II • A European register of quality assurance agencies will be produced. • A European Register Committee will act as a gatekeeper for the inclusion of agencies in the register. • A European Consultative Forum for Quality Assurance in Higher Education will be established.

  27. Recognition of qualifications • National Academic Recognition Information Centre (NARIC) • Now housed in NQAI • National Reference Point (NRP) • Also at NQAI – vocational qualifications • Lisbon Recognition Convention

  28. Overarching framework of qualifications • Qualifications not just about higher education • Irish national framework includes other levels (such as school and further education), so do some others • Group J today is considering the framework and the Copenhagen Process • European framework of qualifications

  29. Recommendation from Copenhagen Seminar, Jan 2005 that higher education institutions as well as students and their organizations • continue to contribute, as active stakeholders, to the development and maintenance of national framework of qualifications as well as the overarching framework for qualifications of the European Higher Education Area; • ensure that the national framework of qualifications, and any alignment with the overarching framework for the EHEA, be referenced in all Diploma Supplements; • make use of learning outcomes at the level of modules or units as well as at the level of qualifications.

  30. Implications • Ireland is in good shape, structurally, to meet this aspect of the Bologna process • Further work required to ensure full implementation at institutional level and in our quality assurance and awarding bodies • Continue to develop and review the framework

More Related