1 / 22

220 likes | 363 Views

Materials for Lecture 20. Read Chapter 9 Lecture 20 CV Stationarity.xls Lecture 20 Changing Risk Over Time.xls Lecture 20 VAR Analysis.xls Lecture 20 Simple VAR.xls. Value at Risk Analysis. Value at Risk – VAR

Download Presentation
## Materials for Lecture 20

**An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation**
Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.
Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only.
Download presentation by click this link.
While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.
During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

**Materials for Lecture 20**• Read Chapter 9 • Lecture 20 CV Stationarity.xls • Lecture 20 Changing Risk Over Time.xls • Lecture 20 VAR Analysis.xls • Lecture 20 Simple VAR.xls**Value at Risk Analysis**• Value at Risk – VAR • Originally VAR used to quantify market risk, but considered only 1 source of risk • By year 2000 businesses were integrating their risk management systems across the whole enterprise • Focus on analyzing multiple sources of risk including market risk • Now market based VAR analyses measure integrated market and credit risk**Value at Risk Model**• In an intuitive definition “VAR summarizes the worst loss over a target horizon with a given level of confidence” • VAR defines the quantile of the projected distribution of gains and losses over the target horizon**Value At Risk Model**• If c is the selected confidence level, VAR corresponds to the 1-c lower tail of the probability distribution (the quantile).**Value At Risk (VAR) Model**To estimate the VAR quantile for a risky business use these steps: • Develop a stochastic simulation model of the risky business decision • Validate stochastic variables and validate the model • Pick a ‘c’ value, say, 5%, so 1-c = 95% • Simulate the model and analyze the KOV • Calculate the quantile for the c value • Calculate VAR = Mean – Quantile at 1-c • Report the results**Value At Risk (VAR) Model**• On selecting the ‘c’ value – literature uses the 95% level • This is to say we want to know the value of returns which the businesswill exceed 95% of the time • If simulating 1,000 iterations, the quantile will be the 50th value, so we can sort the stochastic results and read the 50thvalue • Or simply use the PDF in Simetar**VAR in Simetar**• Simulate the KOV and draw a PDF • Change the Confidence level to 0.90 for “c” = 5% • Edit the title of the chart • VAR value is the Lower Quantile**Valuation Models**• A variation on VAR is the traditional valuation model • Valuation models focus on the mean and the variation below the mean**VAR as Risk Capital**• VAR is the equity capital that should be set aside to cover most all potential losses with a probability of “c” • Thus, the VAR is the amount of capital reserves that should be held to meet shortfalls**VAR for Comparing Risky Alternatives**• Simulate multiple scenarios and calculate VAR for each alternative**VAR Shortcomings**• VAR analyses generally used in business gives a false sense of security • The literature assumes Normality for the random variables, why? • Normal is easy to simulate • Can easily calculate the Quantile if you know mean and std deviation Q = Mean – (2.035 * Std Dev) • The chance of a Black Swan is ignored • This understates the Quantile and the equity capital reserve needed to cover cash flow deficits • Contributed to the Recession**Overcoming VAR Shortcomings**• Modify the probability distributions for the random variables that affect the business • Incorporate low probability events that could cause major harm to the business. • Use and EMP distribution and adjust the Probabilities and Sorted Deviates as a Fraction for Black Swan events • Change the F(X) values for the low probability • Change the minimum Xs**Covariance Stationary & Heteroskedasticy**• Part of validation is to test if the standard deviation for random variables match the historical std dev. • Referred to as “covariance stationary” • Simulating outside the historical range causes a problem in that the mean will likely be different from history causing the coefficient of variation, CVSim, to differ from historical CVHist: CVHist = σH / ῩH Not Equal CVSim = σH / ῩS**Covariance Stationary**• CV stationarity likely a problem when simulating outside the sample period: • If Mean for X increases, CV declines, which implies less relative risk about the mean as time progresses CVSim = σH / ῩS • If Mean for X decreases, CV increases, which implies more relative risk about the mean as we get farther out with the forecast CVSim = σH / ῩS • See Chapter 9**CV Stationarity**• The Normal distribution is covariance stationary BUT it is not CV stationary if the mean differs from historical mean • For example: • Historical Mean of 2.74 and Historical Std Dev of 1.84 • Assume the deterministic forecast for mean increases over time as: 2.73, 3.00, 3.25, 4.00, 4.50, and 5.00 • CV decreases while the std dev is constant**CV Stationarity for Normal Distribution**• An adjustment to the StdDev can make the simulation results CV stationary if you are simulating a Normal dist. • Calculate a Jt+i value for each period (t+i) to simulate as: Jt+i= Ῡt+i / Ῡhistory • The Jt+i value is then used to simulate the random variable in period t+i as: Ỹt+i = Ῡt+i + (StdDevhistory * Jt+i * SND) Ỹt+i = NORM(Ῡt+i, StdDev * Jt+i) • The resulting random values for all years t+i have the same CV but different StdDevthan the historical data • This is the result desired when doing multiple year simulations**CV Stationarity and Empirical Distribution**• Empirical distribution automatically adjusts so the simulated values are CV stationary if the distribution is expressed as deviations from the mean or trend Ỹt+i = Ῡt+i * [1 + Empirical(Sj, F(Sj), USD)]**Empirical Distribution Validation**• Empirical distribution automatically adjusts so the simulated values are CV stationary • This is done by adjusting the standard deviation • This poses a problem for validation • The correct method for validating Empirical distribution is: • Set up the theoretical mean and standard deviation • Mean = Historical mean * J • Std Dev = Historical mean * J * CV for simulated values / 100 • Here is an example for J = 2.0**Add Heteroskedasticy to Simulation**• Sometimes we want the CV to change over time • Change in policy could increase the relative risk • Change in management strategy could change relative risk • Change in technology can change relative risk • Change in market volatility can change relative risk • Create an Expansion factor or Et+i value for each year to simulate • Et+i is a fractional adjustment to the relative risk • 0.0 results in No risk at all for the random variable • 1.0 results in same relative risk (CV) as the historical period • 1.5 results in 50% larger CV than historical period • 2.0 results in 100% larger CV than historical period • Chapter 9**Add Heteroskedasticy to Simulation**• Simulate 5 years with no risk for the first year, historical risk in year 2, 15% greater risk in year 3, and 25% greater CV in years 4-5 • The Et+ivalues for years 1-5 are, respectively, 0.0, 1.0, 1.15, 1.25, 1.25 • Apply the Et+i expansion factors as follows: • Normal distribution Ỹt+i = Ῡt+i + (Std Devhistory * Jt+i* Et+i* SND)Ỹt+i=NORM (Ῡt+i, StdDevhistory * Jt+i* Et+i) • Empirical Distribution if Si are deviations from mean Ỹt+i = Ῡt+i * { 1 + [Empirical(Sj, F(Sj), USD) * Et+I]}

More Related