slide1 n.
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Motivation for the Project PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Motivation for the Project

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 20

Motivation for the Project - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

  • Updated on

10 th Annual Performance Report Scorecard AGENDA Welcome Hon. Maurice McTigue Study Results Dr. Jerry Ellig Henry Wray Remarks Hon. Mark Warner Awards Hon. Mark Warner Hon. Maurice McTigue Q&A Full text:

I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
Download Presentation

Motivation for the Project

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

10th Annual Performance Report Scorecard AGENDA Welcome Hon. Maurice McTigue Study Results Dr. Jerry Ellig Henry Wray Remarks Hon. Mark Warner Awards Hon. Mark Warner Hon. Maurice McTigue Q&A Full text:

motivation for the project
Motivation for the Project
  • Share best practices and encourage agencies to improve quality of disclosure
  • Encourage managers to use performance information to manage agencies
  • Get performance information good enough that legislators can use it for oversight and budgeting
project design
Project Design
  • Team of 3 experts with experience in government and/or performance management evaluates reports
  • 12 criteria based on GPRA requirements
  • Evaluate reports from 24 CFO Act agencies
  • Each evaluation reviewed by a member of advisory panel
  • Entire report reviewed by entire advisory panel
a caveat
A caveat …

This Scorecard evaluates only the quality of agency reports, not the quality of the results they produced for the public. Actual agency performance may or may not be correlated with report rankings in this Scorecard.

how we score the reports 1 5 rating scale
How We Score the Reports1-5 rating scale

3 Categories


Public Benefits


4 criteria in each category

Criteria tightened each year to reflect previous year’s best practices

Total score can range from 12 to 60

what did the research team examine
What did the research team examine?
  • Pilot format
    • Required citizens’ report
    • Other materials clearly identified by the citizens’ report (e.g. Performance Reports, Financial Reports)
  • Traditional format
    • Performance and Accountability Report
    • Optional citizens’ report (for effect on readability criterion)
Big MoversNote: Reports that dropped in the rankings did so because they achieved about the same or slightly lower scores as in FY 07.
areas of greatest improvement
Areas of Greatest Improvement
  • Accessibility
  • Readability
  • Results linked to costs
  • Management challenges
best practices
Best Practices
  • Prominent home page links
  • Written for general audience
  • Substantive transmittal letters
  • Citizens’ reports
  • Costs linked to individual measures
  • Progress ratings for management challenges
pilot score improvement widespread
Pilot Score Improvement Widespread
  • 7 agencies were pilots both years
  • 6 improved their scores this year
  • More scored average (36) or higher this year
  • Caveat: Higher scores don’t always signify better content
main reason better access to data
Main Reason: Better Access to Data
  • FY 08 citizens’ reports had more useful content
  • FY 08 citizens’ reports had better links to other data sources
  • FY 08 “snapshots” helped for some reports
pars vs pilots conclusions so far
PARs vs. Pilots: Conclusions So Far
  • Either format can work
  • Both formats can be improved
  • There may be better alternatives to either format
  • Report quality depends more on content than format
format improvements
Format Improvements
  • PARs:


Include citizens’ report

  • Pilots:

More substantive citizens’ reports

User-friendly links to source documents

improvements for both formats
Improvements for Both Formats
  • More prominent links and better contact information online
  • More informative transmittal letters
  • Plain language throughout
  • Reader-friendly tables and graphics
  • Clear, concise, outcome-oriented metrics
  • Candor in all aspects of reporting
for more information
For More Information

Mercatus Scorecard web page: