Nature & Development of Anticipated Regret as a Protective Factor in Adolescent Risk Taking

1. Nature & Development of Anticipated Regret as a Protective Factor in Adolescent Risk Taking Matthew Dunham Adolescent Risk Taking (Psych 4900) Weber State University

2. INTRODUCTION • Regret Theory • Negative feeling associated with negative outcome and specifically how they could have been avoided if different decision had been made • Anticipated Regret • Lottery ticket exchange • Review • Correlation Approach • Experimental Approach • Developmental Approach

3. Caffray & Schneider (2000) • Affective Motivators in risk-taking behaviors • Three classes of affective states • Promote risky behaviors by enhancing pleasant affective states • Promote behaviors by reducing or avoiding negative affective states • Deter risky behaviors by avoiding anticipated regret • METHODS • High Risk Group vs. Low Risk Group • RESULT • Low risk takers reported influence of anticipated regret as deterrent whereas high experience desired to avoid unpleasant emotions in addition to positive affective states which motivated them to engage in risky behaviors • Anticipated regret correlated with deterrence

4. Richard et al. (1996) • Does anticipated regret decrease risky behavior? • Study tested whether anticipated regret actually caused decrease in risky behavior • METHODS • Students randomly assigned to think about (control group) and after (anticipated regret induction) unprotected sex • Students reported feelings immediately after thought experiment & their respective behavior five months later • RESULTS • Subjects in anticipated regret induction condition felt worse and subsequently used more protective measures (condoms) as compared to the control group. • Anticipated regret caused deterrence.

5. Amsel et al. (2003) • Is anticipated regret a skill that is acquired or typically not used? • METHODS • Preteens vs. college students scaffold as they think through decisions basing them on desirable and potentially regretful (hang out w/. friends as opposed to study) compared to less desirable behavior but less regretful (studying and maybe being teased by friends for not hanging out) • RESULTS • At each stage, preteens performed worse in their ability to make judgments (anticipated feelings about outcomes, etc). • With extensive scaffolding, preteens were able to make adult-like anticipated regret based decisions.

6. CONCLUSION • SUMMARY • Anticipated Regret is a causal influence on risk deterrence. • Adolescents appear to be “adult” in way they think about risk (not impulsive; future long-term perspective) which adolescents, in general, are particularly bad at doing. • FUTURE DIRECTIONS • Educational Implications • How to develop resources for adolescents to anticipate regrets? • Role of Context • Assess when adolescents will or will not anticipate regret

7. REFERENCES • Caffray, C., & Schneider, S. (2000) • Why do they do it? Affective motivators in adolescents’ decisions to participate in risk behaviors. Cognition and Emotion, 14, 543-576 • Richard, R., Van der Pligt, J., & De Vries, N. (1996) • Anticipated Regret and Time Perspective: Changing Sexual Risk-taking Behavior. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 9, 185-199 • Amsel, E., Bowden, T., Cottrell, J., & Sullivan, J. (2003) • Anticipating and Avoiding Regret as a Model of Adolescent Decision-Making. In J. Jacobs & P. Klaczynski, (Eds.) The development of judgment and decision-making in children and adolescence (pp. 119-154). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.