1 / 7

Review for Exam 2

Review for Exam 2. Topics included. Deadlock detection Resource and communication deadlock Graph algorithms: Routing , spanning tree, MST, leader election etc Shortest path computation Distance vector and Link State Routing Compact routing Spanning tree and MST Leader election

konane
Download Presentation

Review for Exam 2

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Review for Exam 2

  2. Topics included Deadlock detection Resource and communication deadlock Graph algorithms: Routing, spanning tree, MST, leader election etc Shortest path computation Distance vector and Link State Routing Compact routing Spanning tree and MST Leader election Synchronizers: alpha and beta Fault and fault-tolerance: various protocols Be familiar with different types of failure, like omission, transient, Byzantine Study different types of fault-tolerance Tolerating omission failures: network protocols Classifying fault-tolerance Distributed Consensus Specification of the consensus problem Simple cases of impossibility with asynchronous processes: understand the spirit of it Byzantine Generals problem and solutions: Understand OM(1) and SM(1) Failure detectors: completeness and accuracy properties: What is the big deal about implementing consensus using failure detectors? This list is not exhaustive

  3. Sample question 1 (a) A (non-real-time) system deadlocks whenever a security breach is about to occur. What kind of fault-tolerance is this? (a) Masking (b) non-masking (c) fail-safe (d) the system is not fault tolerant. (b) Many problems in distributed computing can be reduced to the consensus problem. Which one of the following is NOT a consensus problem? Mutual exclusion Leader election Distributed snapshot Total order multicast (means: all processes receiving one another’s message in timestamp order). (c) In a system of five processes 0 through 4, processes 2 and 3 crashed. The followingis the list of suspects recorded by the correct processes: Process 0: {1, 2, 3} Process 1: {2, 3, 4} Process 4: {2, 3} What kind of completeness and accuracy properties does the failure detector satisfy? Justify your answer.

  4. Sample question 2 25 2 In the following network, the propagation delays of the different edges are shown as edge labels.With node 0 as the root, compute the spanning tree using Chang’s algorithm. Assume that the probes or the echoes spend negligible amount of time at the various nodes. 0 1 2 1 10 3 5 4 3 1 4 3 7 12 6 7 8 5 1 Answer. To answer this question, you have to mark the edges of the spanning tree using the (X) sign.

  5. Sample question 3 Four travelers A, B, C, D were lost in a desert. Each of them looked at the starry night, and tried to decide whether to head north (N), or south (S), or east (E), or west (W). For their safety, it is important that all of them travel together and move in the same direction. D has bad motives - he wants the group to split, so that he could rob some of his travel companions. However, the others do not know about this – they only know that at most one of them is not trustworthy. The remaining ones have to reach a consensus about the direction they will head to – so they run the OM(1) version of Byzantine Generals Algorithm. If A wants to go north, B wants to go north, C wants to go south, and D tells A to go east, but tells B and C to head south, then what direction with A, B, and C head to? What is the basis of their judgment? (You can assume that in the absence of a clear majority, everyone will decide to head east.)

  6. Sample question 4 In a completely connected network of seven processes, up to twocan crash. The model of computation is asynchronous, and the goal is to reach consensus. Each process has a perfect failure detector, The basic idea for each process is to broadcast its input value to every other process, and make sure that eventually all processes collect the same set of values, applies a (commonly agreed) choice function, and generates the final decision. Assume that processes broadcast in rounds, and in each round every process sends (or forwards) a value to every other process, and receives a value from every other process. Each broadcast consists of a sequence of unicasts (i.e. point-to-point communication), and the crash can occur at any time. To make sure that any input value that has been generated by some process at least once eventually reaches all non-faulty processes, each process has to broadcast the input (or received) values for several rounds. What is the minimum number of roundsfor which the broadcast must be continued, so that eventually all processes collect the same set of values? For a complete answer, provide a brief justification for your answer.

  7. Sample question 5 Here is a description of Peterson's algorithm for leader election on a unidirectional ring: Processes communicate using aliases. Each process two colors: redand black. Initially every process is red. A red process turns black when it quits the race for being a leader. A black process is passive - it only forwards the incoming messages to its neighbor. (Description of the algorithm included here) For a ring of eight processes 0 through 7, figure out an initial configuration, so that the leader is elected in the second round.

More Related