The Nature of Organizational Behaviour Chapter 1 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

slide1 n.
Download
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
The Nature of Organizational Behaviour Chapter 1 PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
The Nature of Organizational Behaviour Chapter 1

play fullscreen
1 / 19
The Nature of Organizational Behaviour Chapter 1
870 Views
Download Presentation
kolton
Download Presentation

The Nature of Organizational Behaviour Chapter 1

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

  1. The Nature of Organizational Behaviour Chapter 1

  2. Introduction to the course • This lecture series will be divided into five parts, corresponding with the parts in Work and Organizational Behaviour(Bratton et al., 2007) • In the first part of this lecture series we will: • Examine the nature of organizational behaviour • Give a summary of the historical dimensions of paid work • Present concepts and theories. • This will provide you with a basis for evaluating the competing perspectives on what determines and influences the behaviour of people in organizations.

  3. Overview of the first three lectures • Lecture 1: The nature of OB • Explains that OB is a multidisciplinary field of study • Emphasizes that external contexts have a significant impact on the way people work and behave • Introduces the social dynamics of class, gender, disability, race and ethnicity and how they underpin contemporary organizational behaviour. Lecture 2: Work in organizations • Explores the continuities as well as the discontinuities in paid work over time • Highlights diversity and equity issues in the workplace • Explains how employment is inherently and irreducibly constructed, interpreted and organized through social actions and social discourse. Lecture 3: Studying work and organizations • Introduces the three founders of the sociology of work – Marx, Durkheim and Weber • Shows how organizational theorists have used different theoretical approaches to exploring work organizations – technical, human relations, neo-human relations, systems thinking, contingency, cultures, learning, control, feminist, social action, political and post-modern.

  4. The nature of organizational behaviour ‘The productivity of the knowledge worker is likely to become the center of the management of people .… This will require, above all, very different assumptions about people in organizations and their work.’(Drucker, 1999: 21) ‘With corporations at the centre of globalization, they can be blamed for much of its ills as well as given credit for many of its achievements.’ (Stiglitz, 2006: 188)

  5. Figure 1.1:The three levels of social structure surrounding the organization What is OB? • OB is the systematic study of form organizations and of what people think, feel and do around organizations. • Work organizations are simply physical and legal structures within which people undertake paid work – it is the people who ‘behave’ and not, of course, the organizations. • It is best understood as a series of complex active processes in which people participate formally and informally at various levels (see figure 1.1, opposite) in ways shaped by organizational roles and power. • OB is embedded in the wider social, cultural and institutional fabric of society.

  6. Formal organizations pervade our modern world. Their presence affects our economic, cultural, political and ecological environment, providing employment, producing goods and services, lobbying politicians and policy-makers and infecting the ecosystem. The move towards more knowledge-based work and the growing acknowledgement that people are the key to sustainable competitive advantage strengthens the case for behavioural studies in modern management education. Study of OB leads to an understanding of: How people undertake paid work How they interact with each other How decisions made by people controlling the organization affect the people in it, and its performance How you can learn to influence processes and shape events within an organization We will return to this question later in the lecture, once you have learned a little more about the nature of OB Why study OB (Part I)?

  7. The presence of a group of people who have something in common and who deliberately or consciously design a structure and processes. Activity directed towards accomplishing a goal or set of imperatives. The existence of an identifiable boundary that establishes common membership A connection to external society – because organizational activities and action influence the environment or larger society. Work organizations vary in terms of their: Size Products or services Purpose Ownership Management What are work organizations? • Work organizations can be demarcated from other social entities or collectivities by four common characteristics:

  8. What does the study of OB involve? Organizational behaviour is an interdisciplinary study of: • The behaviour of individuals and groups • Organizational design and technology in which human behaviour takes place • Control processes over resources, people and work activities • Management processes, for example, the recruitment, training & rewards to workers • Interaction between the organizational, the external and evaluative context • Relationship between organizational agency and societal stability or instability at large (see Figure 1.2)

  9. Integrated framework for studying OB • The model is divided into four components: • The environmental forces as external context inputs • The processes for converting the inputs into outputs within an individual, group managerial milieu as the organizational context • The evaluation or organizational process as evaluation outputs; and • A feedback loop which links the organizational processes and external environmental forces, with the feedback flowing into the organization and from the organization into the environmental external context (see Figure 1.2). Figure 1.2:An integrated framework for studying organizational behaviour

  10. Multidisciplinary OB • OB has no agreed boundaries and sources in the manner of other management fields (e.g. accounting, economics). • OB researchers gather and analyze data using either quantitative or qualitative methods or a combination of both. • OB covers a variety of disciplines including: • Psychology – the systematic study of behaviours and mental processes (Plotnik, 2005) • Sociology – the systematic study of the pattern of social relationships that develop between human beings) • Anthropology – the scientific study of mankind, especially of their societies and customs) • Political Science – the study of individual and group behaviour within a political system) • The next slide (Table 1.1) shows which areas of OB are drawn from which disciplines.

  11. Where does OB come from? Table 1.1Towards a multi-disciplinary approach to OB

  12. Why study OB (Part II)? • OB is an applied social science involving study of people, groups, decision-making, power, politics, ethics, culture etc. • It has practical, everyday management uses and enables us to predict, explain and influence organizational activities. • Understanding OB is a requirement for active citizenship in advanced capitalist societies that are subject to periodic turbulence and change – only then can we hope to influence, manage and change the way organizations function in society. Figure 1.3:Reasons for studying organizational behaviour

  13. Studying diversity is not simply a matter of learning about other people’s cultures – it involves discovering how class, gender, race, ethnicity and disability frame people’s life chances and work experience. Understanding the significance these issues puts the behaviour of individuals and groups in the organization into a wider social context. The capitalist mode of production is in itself disabling for some people. Diversity

  14. How people approach their subject of study depends on their life experiences and a whole series of assumptions they make about people and society. Much debate in organizational behaviour stems from competing theoretical perspectives (or ‘lenses’), defined for present purposes as frameworks of interconnected beliefs, values and assumptions that guide thinking and research on the nature of the social world. Many theorists fall into one of the following four competing ideological camps: Managerialist (or structural-functionalist) Critical Symbolic interactionist Feminist The next slide gives an overview of the main characteristics of each perspective. Ways of approaching OB

  15. Characteristics of OB perspectives Table 1.2Comparing major perspectives on organizational behaviour

  16. OB theorists do not merely approach their subject from different perspectives; they also make differing assumptions about how organizations should be investigated. An OB theorist’s approach to research will depend on their ontological and epistemological ideology. Ontology deals with the nature of being. It considers whether social entities (such as formal organizations) can/should be considered objective entities with a reality external to the individual (objectivism), or whether they can/should be considered social constructions built up from the perceptions and actions of the individual (constructionism). Epistemology deals with theory of knowledge. It considers what can/should be regarded as acceptable knowledge, what knowledge can/should be collected and what can/should be regarded as true/false. Epistemological approaches include positivism, empiricalrealism, critical realism and interpretivism. Ways of approaching research

  17. Research methods can be broadly classified as either quantitative or qualitative. Quantitative research is a research strategy that emphasizes numerical data and statistical analyses. Qualitative research is a research strategy that emphasizes non-numerical data The approach that an OB researcher takes will depend on their ontological and epistemological stance. The table oppose shows the characteristics of qualitative and quantitative research methods and how these relate to different ideologies. Ways of researching OB Figure 1.4:A scheme for comparing quantitative and qualitative research strategies

  18. So what?! • Researchers make different ontological and epistemological assumptions that affect how they attempt to investigate and obtain ‘knowledge’ about organizational behaviour. • Management is embedded in the social structure, and is highly political. For example, OB theorists sometimes quote managers’ opinions to the exclusion of other people who are affected by the managers’ actions.. • It is necessary to have an awareness of these factors and to maintain a healthy scepticism as we read what researchers have to say about OB, and indeed as we form our own opinions and consider what perspectives they may reflect.

  19. Assignments • Read Chapter 1 of Work and Organizational Behaviour(Bratton et al., 2007) • Write a paragraph defining ‘organization’. • Write a paragraph defining ‘organizational behaviour’. • Some authors state that OB relates to the process of a manager’s job. Explain what this means. • Write a few paragraphs explaining which of the four sociological perspectives do you think best fits your own ideas about human behaviour and work organizations and why. • If you were asked to conduct research in OB, which research approach would you use, and why? Write a few paragraphs explaining your answer. • Read the case study on pages 33–4 of the book and complete the task.