1 / 16

Personality & Identity

Personality & Identity. Chapter 3: 91-104 Organizational Behavior 261 Gabrielle Durepos. Outline. Towards an understanding of Personality Personality and OB: why we should care Theories of Personality: Situational Theories of Personality Person [trait] Theories of Personality

kiril
Download Presentation

Personality & Identity

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Personality & Identity Chapter 3: 91-104 Organizational Behavior 261 Gabrielle Durepos

  2. Outline • Towards an understanding of Personality • Personality and OB: why we should care • Theories of Personality: • Situational Theories of Personality • Person [trait] Theories of Personality • Interactional Theory of Personality • Examining the concept of ‘fit’: • Supplementary Fit • Complementary Fit • Person-Job Fit • Person-Organization Fit • Person-Workgroup Fit • Conclusions

  3. Towards an Understanding of: Personality • Refers to all the mental and behavioral characteristics that make up and define the uniqueness of an individual • Characteristics are called personality traits • Examples include: shy, kind, anxious, trustworthy, outgoing • Personality is shaped by both genetic (nature) and environmental (nurture) influences • Personality traits remain stable over time • This is unlike identity which is fluid • Personality can be said to provide general direction for an individual’s choices and behaviors

  4. Towards an Understanding of:Personality • Two Perspectives on Personality: 1) Behavioral • Personality can be ‘observed’ by others • Personality is public, stable, objective and describable • Personality can be used by others to: • Describe your personality traits based on past behavior • Predict your future behavior based on your unique set of personality traits 2) Mental • Personality has internal components which others can not see • Ex: decisions made by individuals are influenced by their personality traits but through observation, we can not tell which personality traits affected the decision

  5. Personality and Organizational Behavior:Why we should care • Our unique make up of personality traits affects: • Our behavior in an organization • How well we fit in a workgroup • How well we fit in an organization • How well we fit in a job • Our choice of career • How well we fit in a job & career can affect: • Our performance at work • Our job satisfaction • Our level of stress • Our level of efficiency

  6. Theories of Personality • There are many theories of personality • Most are derived from the Psychology literature • Contributors include Freud, Maslow, Skinner, Piaget and etc. • We cover a basic overview • Personality and the nature – nurture debate • Nature • External factors do not shape individual personality • individuals are born with unique sets of personality traits • These personality traits help explain their behavior in organizations • Nurture • External factors contribute to and shape an individuals personality after birth • Individuals develop personality traits based on interpersonal situations • The organization is one site in which individual personality traits are shaped

  7. Theories of Personality:Situational Theories of Personality • Falls on the NURTURE side of the continuum • The environment / situation is a key determinant of personality • An individual is not born with an innate set of personality traits • The organization is an example of an environment where personality is shaped • Situational theorists focus on ‘the context’ of the individual to understand: • The causes of an individuals job satisfaction • Job performance • Other work attitudes • Example: Pavlov’s dogs salivating after hearing the bell • Criticisms • Everyone in the same situation will have the same personality? • We know this not to be the case, how do we account for differences?

  8. Theories of Personality:Person [trait] Theories of Personality • Falls on the NATURE side of the continuum • An individual is born with an innate, stable set of personality traits • The environment / situation is not a key determinant of personality • Individuals within a same situation / organization will: • Interact and respond differently based on their unique make up of personality traits • Person [trait] theorists focus on identifying an individual’s personality traits: • But do not focus to an individual’s situation • Fit a person to a job: Try and match personality traits of an individual with traits that are required to do a job • To predict future performance, attitudes, stress levels, ability to work with others

  9. Theories of Personality:Interactional Theory of Personality • Falls in the middle of the NATURE-NURTURE continuum • An individual’s personality is a result of: • The personality traits they are born with • The situation / environment in which they interact • An ‘interaction’ of specific situations and individual predispositions • Organizations are a result of the people that are in them [nature] • Individuals bring their personalities to work and shape the organization • Individuals do not check their personalities at the door – like their coat • Individuals are influenced by the organization [nurture] • Individuals are shaped by ‘the dominant ways of acting’ that have been engrained in the organization

  10. Examining the concept of ‘fit’ • Our interest is in finding a good ‘match’ or ‘fit’ between an individual and a: • Job, Organization, Workgroup, Profession • We ask: • Are potential employees ‘compatible’ with their job, organization, workgroup, profession? • Do they have the right knowledge? qualification? skills? attitudes? • The right ‘fit’ is important as: • ‘Win-Win’ • Employees Win: efficiency, productivity, satisfaction • Organization Wins: productivity, profitability • The lack of ‘fit’ can lead to: • High turnover, high recruiting costs, low productivity, decreased employee morale, decreased employee self-esteem, etc.

  11. Examining the concept of ‘fit’: Supplementary Fit • A theory of ‘fit’ from the organizations perspective • Theory states that: • The hired employee has the SAME set of characteristics as those who are currently employed in the organization • Characteristics include: skill sets, work experience, educational background • Supplementary fit forms the basis for vocational choice • People prefer to work in organizations or professions with others who share similar characteristics

  12. Examining the concept of ‘fit’: Complementary Fit • A theory of ‘fit’ from the organization’s perspective • Theory states that: • The hired employees has a DIFFERENT set of characteristics than those currently employed • The organization identifies deficiencies in skill sets, knowledge, skills, etc. in their current workgroups • The hired employee ‘complements’ the organization by filling a void

  13. Examining the concept of ‘fit’: Person-Job Fit • Employee selection is traditionally based on person-fit • Examines the perspective of ‘fit’ between the individual and some aspect of work • Is the person suitable for a set of interrelated tasks? • Does the person posses the ‘right’ set of personality traits that will enable them to fulfill the set of interrelated tasks needed for the job? • A ‘good’ fit means that a job applicant’s knowledge, skills and abilities (KSA’s) correspond with the job requirements • Job requirements are developed by an organization and listed in a job analysis • A job analysis is an explicit identification of all the requirements needed to fulfill a job or set of interrelated tasks • A job analysis may not mention specific needed personality traits • Person-Job fit is important because: • Acts as a basis for standardizing employment practices • It ensures consistency in recruiting and hiring processes • Criticisms: • Assumes that jobs are stable / unchanging over time • Assumes that a given job will always be needed or relevant

  14. Examining the concept of ‘fit’: Person-Organization Fit • Examines the perspective of ‘fit’ between the individual and some aspect of work: • Is the person suitable for a specific organization? • Is the person’s needs, goals and values compatible with the organizations values, goals, culture and reward systems? • A ‘good’ fit between an individual and organization may lead to: • Greater motivation on the individual’s behalf to perform well • The downside of too much person-organization alignment: • discrimination towards those who do not ‘fit’ • narrowed vision, low adaptability to change, less competitiveness • too much agreement, not enough questioning and thus unethical choices • ex: Challenger Space Shuttle disaster

  15. Examining the concept of ‘fit’: Person-Workgroup Fit • Examines the perspective of ‘fit’ between the individual and some aspect of work: • Do the personality traits of an individual make them good candidates to work in a given group? • Is the person’s needs, goals, attitudes and values compatible with the workgroup values, goals, work ethic? • Person-Workgroup fit may more important in certain organizations • Organizations whose workflows are organized around self managed work teams • The downside of too much person-workgroup alignment: • discrimination towards those who do not ‘fit’ • narrowed vision, low adaptability to change, less competitiveness • too much agreement, not enough questioning and thus unethical choices

  16. Conclusions • Is personality shaped nature or nurture? • What is the implication for the organization? • Does this subject remind you of organizational culture? • What are the similarities? • What are the differences? • Personality is at the individual level = culture at the organizational level? • IF personality is based on nurture – can we CHANGE PERSONALITY of employees to match the CULTURE of the organization? • What are the ethical concerns?

More Related