1 / 3

I. Physics Possibilities of Reactor Neutrino Experiments -   (m 2 13 )

Draft Outline for Report. I. Physics Possibilities of Reactor Neutrino Experiments -   (m 2 13 )

kioko
Download Presentation

I. Physics Possibilities of Reactor Neutrino Experiments -   (m 2 13 )

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Draft Outline for Report I. Physics Possibilities of Reactor Neutrino Experiments-  (m213) - neutrino magnetic moment- Finesse physics- structure functions- sin^2 theta W (can NuTeV result be checked?)- Search for oscillation effects of sterile neutrinos (If MiniBoone confirms LSND signal, can reactor experiments be helful?)- CPT tests (nu bar from reactor vs. solar neutrino); can new experiments improve these tests- Can detectors also be useful for supernova detection?- Can other experiments (or detector R&D) take advantage of new underground facilities near reactor?- Better measurement of absolute neutrino spectrum from reactor?

  2. II. Reactor experiment to measure A. Systematic issues common to all approaches: -- efficiency -- energy calibration -- backgroundB. General detector issues -- Choice of scintillator -- Number of detector regions -- Calibration schemes -- Movable detectorsC. Comparison of different experimental approaches -- Can we develop figures of merit to compare different experimental approaches, sites? -- What will be needed to establish a signal? For example, will some energy spectrum information be required? Will it be necessary to evaluate detector efficiency in independent ways? -- Other issues relevant for site selection (e.g., environmental impact).

  3. D. Systematic precision attainable with different experiments o. BRIEF reports on worldwide activities i. Small (CHOOZ-2): fixed 10-ton detectors at 1.1 km baseline ii. Medium: 50-ton detectors (Movable vs Fixed) iii. Large: 250-1000 ton (single or multiple far detectors -- are identical near and far detectors needed?). What is the ultimate reactor experiment?E. Sensitivity studies for different options; complementarity with acceleratorsF. Discussion of cost/timescale for different scales of experiments.III. Discussion of possible roadmap for future reactor neutrino experiments.

More Related