biomass power 2012 year in review n.
Download
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Biomass Power 2012 Year in Review PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Biomass Power 2012 Year in Review

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 23

Biomass Power 2012 Year in Review - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 119 Views
  • Uploaded on

Biomass Power 2012 Year in Review. San Diego March 21 and 22, 2012. Federal Activities at a Glance. Boiler MACT/NHSM Changes in Section 45 Tailoring Rule 2013 Vision/Priorities. We Worked With Friends. Boiler MACT—AF&PA, NAM NHSM—C&D Lobby (CMRA) BCAP-Ag Energy Coalition

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

Biomass Power 2012 Year in Review


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    Presentation Transcript
    biomass power 2012 year in review

    Biomass Power2012 Year in Review

    San Diego

    March 21 and 22, 2012

    federal activities at a glance
    Federal Activities at a Glance
    • Boiler MACT/NHSM
    • Changes in Section 45
    • Tailoring Rule
    • 2013 Vision/Priorities
    we worked with friends
    We Worked With Friends
    • Boiler MACT—AF&PA, NAM
    • NHSM—C&D Lobby (CMRA)
    • BCAP-Ag Energy Coalition
    • Tailoring Rule—Bioenergy Coalition
    • Tax-focus was on baseloads
    • Promotion of biomass—ACORE, Biomass Caucus
    boiler mact nhsm
    Boiler MACT/NHSM
    • Three level chess match
    • Legislative
    • Regulatory
    • Litigation
    regulatory
    Regulatory
    • March 21, 2011 EPA published final Boiler MACT and final NHSM.
    • Resounding concerns across industrial sectors.
    • Concerns around feasibility, cost, regulatory uncertainty.
    • EPA immediately gave notice that it was reconsidering Boiler MACT and stayed effective date of rule during reconsideration process.
    • EPA expressed no interest in reconsidering NHSM, despite industry pleas and meetings with the Agency
    • We met with Agency in early December
    • Published revised rules in December, 2012
    • NHSM=good.
    • Boiler MACT=not so sure. Do we litigate?
    coalition formed on all fronts
    Coalition formed on all fronts
    • Boiler and CISWI Coalition—

    American Petroleum Institute ERC

    AFPA Hardwood

    American Wood Council NAM

    BPA Bus Rdtble

    Composite Panel Assn

    CMRA

    Corn Refiners

    legislative congressional intervention
    Legislative/Congressional Intervention
    • HR 2250 “EPA Regulatory Relief Act of 2011. 4 Republican and four Democratic co-sponsors.
    • Stayed Rule
    • Gives EPA more time
    • Provides extra time to comply
    • Directs EPA to adopt EPA’s CISWI solida waste definition
    • Sets more reasonable time limits
    legislation cont d
    Legislation cont’d
    • S. 1392, “EPA Regulatory Relief Act.”
    • Similar to HR 2250, except that provides list of non-hazardous secondary materials that are not “wastes” and thus not subject to CISWI.
    • Garnered broad, bi-partisan support.
    • Senator Wyden took heat in Oregon press
    • Wyden largely responsible for EPA’s reconsideration of the NHSM
    • Legislation ultimately failed but we got a better rule and prevailed (maybe) on NHSM
    coalition efforts
    Coalition Efforts
    • On the Hill (BPA/CBEA Fly-in September, 2012)
    • At the Agency (multiple meetings)
    • Engaged consulting firm, law firm, PR/lobbying teams joined forces
    • Actively litigated both rules in the DC Circuit and the District Court
    litigation briefly summarized
    Litigation, briefly summarized
    • 2001 Sierra Club Petition, Sierra Club v. Jackson, seeking to compel the Agency to issue rules.
    • EPA entered into consent decree.
    • Coalition, Sierra Club filed challenge to Feb 2011 Rules.
    • Challenges to EPA’s stay of Rules
    • Challenges to Rules on Hold
    • Court overturned EPA’s Stay
    • Do we continue to litigate?
    tailoring rule we must win this
    Tailoring Rule—We Must Win This!

    Background

    • June 3, 2010, EPA published final PSD and Title V GHG Tailoring Rule
    • New facilities emitting 100,000 TPY on a C02.
    • Modifications at existing facilities that exceed 75,000 tpy.
    • EPA elected not to categorically exempt biogenic emissions in June 2010 Rule. Instead published Call for Information
    • July 20, 2011, EPA deferred for three years regulating GHG’s from biogenic, based on petition filed by NAFO
    • Gregg to discuss SAB
    what is at stake
    What is at Stake?
    • State RPS Programs (Mass, Md, and now Ct)
    • Value of biomass versus coal
    • Congressional Support—Tax (Section 45, Carbon Tax)
    • Congressional Suport—Non-tax (RES)
    • Renewable Fuels Standard
    • Section 111(d) of the Clean Air Act
    science of biogenic emissions
    “Science” of Biogenic Emissions
    • May, 2011—”How Manomet got it backwards: Challenging the “debt-then-dividend” axiom.” By Bill Strauss, FutureMetrics.
    • July, 2011—”Regional Crabon Dioxide Implications of Forest Bioenergy Production.” Hudiburg et al. Oregon State University.
    • August, 2011—”Lifecycle Impacts of Forest Management and Bioenergy Production.” Howe et al. Dovetail Partners.
    • June, 2011. 25x25 National Wood-to-energy Roadmap
    • November, 2011. “Managing Forests Because Carbon Matters: Integrating Energy, Products and Land Management Policy, USDA Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station.
    • February, 2012. “Biomass Supply and Carbon Accounting for Southeastern Forests.” BERC.
    • Favorable studies in the EU (Seth Ginther to cover)
    litigation what else
    Litigation (What else?)
    • Filed by NRDC, Center for Biological Diversity, Conservation Law Foundation, NRCM, Georgia Forest Watch, Wild Virginia, Coastal Conservation League, Dogwood Alliance.
    • “The forests and communities of the Southern US are facing a huge threat in the form of industrial-scale wood-based bioenergy…The South is already seeing a huge uptick in the number of new and retrofitted facilities that will burn woody biomass, which will create increasing pressure to cut native, standing forests for fuel.”
    issues in tailoring rule litigation
    Issues in Tailoring Rule Litigation
    • Whether EPA’s deferral was arbitrary, capricious or otherwise unlawful.
    • Whether EPA justifiably relied on “necessity doctrine” ie impossible to impose biogenic emissions on each source.
    • Whether EPA justifiably relied on “de minimis” doctrine.
    • Whether EPA justifiably relied on the “one step at a time” doctrine.
    tailoring rule litigation timeline
    Tailoring Rule Litigation Timeline
    • Joint Brief of Petitioners March 7, 2012
    • Joint Brief of Respondents May 7, 2012
    • Intervenors Brief June 6, 2012
    • Reply Brief, Pet. June 26, 2012
    • Final briefs July 24, 2012
    • Oral argument April, 2013
    • Final decision Summer, 2013
    bpa s legal challenges
    BPA’s Legal Challenges
    • CAA does not authorize EPA to regulate biogenic emissions which do not adversely affect the environment.
    • EPA has discretion to distinguish between carbon emissions and fossil-fuel based emissions.
    • EPA can limit the reach of PSD programs.
    what is our strategy during 2013
    What Is Our Strategy During 2013
    • Comment on EPA’s Draft Framework
    • Engage key agencies (USDA, DOE)
    • Congressional Champions/engage new members
    • Engage Biomass Caucus (BPA is leading the renewal of Caucus)
    • Mike Jostrum to cover in greater depth
    federal tax policy
    Federal Tax Policy
    • Section 45
    • “Commencement of Construction”
    • Tax Parity and political effort
    • Hill Hearings
    • Appearance before the Tax Reform Committee (circulate presentation)
    • New Ideas in the tax realm to assist biomass
    efforts to save bcap and other energy programs in farm bill
    Efforts to Save BCAP and other Energy Programs in Farm Bill
    • Joined Ag Energy Coalition (EESI, Bio, various ag interests)
    • Worked Senate Ag and Senate Approps Committee.
    • Program zeroed out in House
    • President’s 2012 Budget capped CHST at $70 million
    • Funding included in 2012 Senate Farm Bill
    • Stabenow event and support
    • Fate uncertain.
    non legislative activities
    Non-Legislative Activities
    • Coalition Building—focus on baseload technologies
    • Biomass Caucus
    • Annual Fly-in (45 Hill meetings in 2 days)
    • Energy Foundation
    • Bio-energy Coalition
    2013 vision
    2013 Vision
    • Expand Collaboration
    • Grow Membership
    • Advocacy of Boiler MACT/NHSM
    • Advocacy of Biogenic Emissions as “Carbon friendly”
    • Seek extension and tax parity
    • Long-term favorable federal energy policy
    • BCAP and other incentives
    special thanks to
    Special Thanks to…
    • Your support of BPA
    • The BPA Board
    • My Assistant, Kerry Hewitt
    • Carrie Annand at Hillenby
    • Gary Melow
    • Tim Urban and the Team at WCEY
    • CBEA and Julee and her Team